Arguments Against Same Sex Marriage

never voted for same-sex marriage, that their rights should not be granted. They also argued that the LGBT community should not be allowed to redefine marriage. As a result, the backer of Prop. 8 urged the gay community to take the issue to a ballot. Instead of allegedly conspiring with the judges to rule in their favor, which goes against the will of the people.

One of the most controversial issues surrounding American today is allowing same-sex couples to adopt a child. Over the last decade, America has seen a frequent number of people “come out” in their lives. Because of this, we have seen more

Since religion plays a huge part in America and its government, for many years gays did not have the right to marry, because it was consider as a “sin.” As Kory Schaff says in his article entitled, “Equal Protection and Same-Sex Marriage,” “Religious views that condemn homosexuality continue to influence the exercise of political coercion resulting in the use of state power to deny individuals equal protection” (133). There are still thousands of people who view gay as a “sin” and are actually not happy with the recent changes that happened in favor of gay people. But what made the government change its ideas and laws was the LGBTQ rights movements. Thousand of people, gay or not, came together and started peaceful marchs and praids to support LGBTQ community and fought for their rights, and they were successful to achieve what they wanted. But it is important to realize that they didn’t only wanted the right of marriage. That was a huge part of it, but they are still having marchs and praide because

According to Lifelong Adoption around 135,000 kids are adopted each year in America. There are 594,000 same sex couples in the US, but only 100,000 have children. Among the same sex couples around 49% of them are wanting to adopt and are even willing to take on the “ less desireable” children, ones with physical and mental disabilities. About 40% of agencies have reported making at least one

Several studies have shown that couples of the same sex are more financially stable than couples of the opposite sex and the children would be psychologically better off if they were adopted. “Same sex couples had higher education levels and greater economic status than the opposite sex couples and that both parents in the same sex couple were more likely to be employed” (Rosman). In some situations, a child is better off being adopted by a same sex couple. They would be able to always provide for their child and give them a better life than what they would have had if they were not adopted and put in the foster care system. “There were no significant differences between teenagers living with same-sex parents and those living with other sex parents on self reported assessments of psychological well being, such as self esteem and anxiety; measures of school outcomes, such as grade point averages and trouble in school; or measures of family relationships,

Though there are differences in the views of different faiths, conservative Protestants, the Catholic Church, Mormons, traditional Jews, and Muslims share two fundamental antigay arguments. The first is that homosexuality is wrong because it involves sex that doesn 't create life. In the case of Judaism, a key Bible passage is the story of Onan (Links to an external site.), who sleeps with his dead brother 's wife but, to avoid giving his brother offspring, doesn 't ejaculate inside her. Instead, he "spilt the seed on the ground." God slew him, which some might view as a sign of disapproval (Links to an external site.).The Catholic catechism decries (Links to an external site.) homosexual acts because "they close the sexual act to the gift of life." Early American antisodomy laws discouraged all forms of non-procreative sex (including, incidentally, heterosexual oral and anal sex). Islam shares a similar view. One Islamic hadith explains that Allah "will not look at the man who commits sodomy with a man or a woman." But if non-procreative sex is the issue, society started down the slippery slope not with the recent Supreme Court ruling but with production of the pill—or, really, even earlier, when birth control became common. We 've been into the non-procreative sex thing for some time now. Even most religious conservatives don 't have the heart to go after this. If sex without the possibility of creating life is wrong, then religious

I believe that gay marriage is a right that all Americans can choose to have. Even if you are not homosexual each and every american should have the right to express themselves freely. Most people are very discriminatory about this topic but in today's society we should change that view. Because people think this is a problem, other bigger issues are being ignored. After all of

Gay marriage was first applied for in 1970, but was rejected until 2003. This is the way it should have stayed… In 1970, Richard John Baker and James Michael McConnell applied to Hennepin County District Court clerk Gerald Nelson for a marriage license. He denied the application because both applicants were men. Baker and McConnell sued Nelson and the court sided with Nelson, as did the Minnesota and U.S. Supreme Courts because all ruled that marriage is between a man and a woman. Same-sex marriage should not be legalized in any other states and should be reconsidered in the 37 states it’s currently legal in because children need a mother and father and legalizing these unions could lead to a slippery slope of approving

Thank you for your post. I used a similar example about reversing the situation. What if a gay couple owned a bakery and a customer asked if they would make a cake saying that would say Gay marriage is wrong. The couple would most likely refuse as its goes against their beliefs. No one should have to force themselves to do something that they feel is morally wrong. I do not agree that Christian's are a protected group and it would be a different outcome. All citizens of the United States are protected by the equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment, and justices apply this clause to all situations concerning this issue. What are your thoughts on the future of this issue? Will the people become more accepting of business

In today’s society more and more children become orphans each day. While the number of orphans rise, so does the demand for families these children. By legalizing same sex adoption in the U.S., the number of orphans could drop substantially. In 2003, adoption agencies received many homosexual applicants, especially gay men (Gilgoff, 2004). In 2014, around 400,000 children entered in the United States foster care system. Out of those entered, only 100,000 of them were eligible to be adopted. A large amount of those children could have been adopted by the eager same sex couples who desperately want to start a family of their own. In 2011 nearly two million children lived in a foster home run by a same sex couple (Maxwell and Kelsey, 2014). That number has increased since the legalization of same sex adoption. Diane Goodman, an attorney and lesbian mother, stated that parents, disregarding their sexual orientation, have multiple similarities. All mothers and fathers deal with the same struggles, no matter their gender. The commonalities shared by hetero and homosexual couples help

Austin Reynolds, in his term paper, “ k,” proves with strong assertations that there is evidence to support the legalization of homosexual marriage, though many would argue that it will harm the sanctity of marriage and harm the right to freedom of religion. Reynolds supports his ideas by expounding upon the inequality that LGBT people are given and how gay marriage will bring harm to no man, women, or child. The author’s purpose is to inform the reader on all aspects of gay marriage so they understand the controversial reasoning behind the idea as well as the arguments against the proposal. Reynolds writes in a formal tone for the American Studies English teachers at Granite Hills High School.

Nowadays, governments internationally have control of many things: finance, laws, and militaries- and, somehow, such a primitive and natural thing as the right to love. Same sex marriages are criminalized in 78 international territories and are not recognized as legal unions in over one hundred countries. Same-sex marriages should be legal and accepted internationally, without bias in front of the law and amongst the citizens. I, as a strong supporter and member of the LGBTQ+ community, believe and know that one’s sexual orientation is as unalterable as the color of your skin. If legal adversity to an inherent trait such as skin tone was abolished over one hundred and fifty years ago, then why is it that we live in a world where something just as indispensable, like love, is restricted and feared by a higher authority?

Same sex marriage has been around for a considerable length of time, in daily papers, on TV and in the present neighborhood news: gay marriage. It most likely is a moral issue and the quandary indicates us two sides: individuals are either for gay marriage or they are against gay marriage. Law can sanction gay marriage and if not, discipline in prison could be the subsequent stage. What's more, that is the place the moral predicament begins. Every single person have certain requirements in life, these necessities could contrast per singular, so as a regularly acknowledged model there is the Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs. This model depicts the essential human needs which additionally expresses that the most fundamental needs should be met before alternate needs can be satisfied. The primary needs are the physiological needs. These requirements incorporate sustenance, water, the fundamentals to survive. Once these necessities are met whatever is left of the models needs can be satisfied as far as possible up to self-completion. In the middle of physiological and self-realization is another progression that should be satisfied: love and a feeling of having a place. Love of family and companions or the human requirement for enthusiastic and sexual connections. One case in this progression could be marriage. Hetero couples can address this issue without an issue. In any case, if gay people are not permitted to wed lawfully, does this imply gay people are not permitted to satisfy

There are approximately 120,000 children that are adopted each year in the United States. On the other hand, there are still 115,000 children that are still on a waiting list to be adopted. That is almost double the number of children that are adopted a year. It is more likely an adoption agency would prefer a heterosexual couple to an LBGT couple in the United States. Long Life Adoption, an agency for LBGT families that are waiting to adopt, the statics show the facts of adoptions for same-sex couples and opposite-sex couples. In a household’s marriage of the opposite- sex there are 22,872,151 children, but in the household of an average same-sex couple there are 94,627 children. That is a huge difference. Although this is a progressing issue today it is not fair that a same-sex couple cannot adopt a child faster than the average opposite- sex couples. Same–sex couples can petition for adoption statewide,

People are born homosexual. If you are homosexual you cannot get married. That idea is ridiculous. On June 26, 2015, the US Supreme Court ruled that the US Constitution guarantees the right for same-sex couples to marry. Marriage is defined as a sacred bond of love between two people. Gay people also feel love therefore, they should be allowed the same rights as everyone else in this country. Homosexuality is an accepted lifestyle nowadays with a proven biological causation. The only thing that should matter in marriage is love and denying them this is a violation of religious freedom.