Arguments Against State Testing

I firmly believe that education should be a top priority for the state of Texas. It could possibly be the state’s priority, and the state’s government officials have faith in that high-stakes testing is the best way to enhance education. The high-stakes testing could give students skills in certain areas - such as working under pressure – but a 2016 report shows Texas is still ranked 41st overall in education ("Texas Earns a C-Minus on State Report Card”). There are proposed solutions already in the works, such as the aforementioned HB 133 that proposed to decrease the amount of exams, and also removes STAAR scores from teacher

According to education researcher Gregory J. Cizek, these tests are not helping the child. They’re hurting them. He knows that teacher need to show off what their students know, but he just doesn't understand why we have to do these tests. He can tell by his work that more than half of kids have an anxiety toward testing. The student may know a lot, but will freeze during the test. “Standardized testing can create a lot of stress for both educators and students. Excellent teachers quit the profession every day because of how much stress is on them. Students especially feel the pressure when there is something meaningful tied to them. In Oklahoma, high school students must pass four standardized tests in various areas, or they do not earn a diploma, even if their GPA was a 4.00. The stress this can cause on a teenager is not healthy in any way,” he states. His plan is to show people that this is a wrong thing to do and is unhealthy for both educators and the

State mandated testing came about in the mid late 1800’s. It is a assessment shown to see students abilities to learn a specific course and if they know the material. Present day in the United States state test can start being taken from elementary school to college . Trying to show if you have mastered the agenda that was brought over a course . State mandated test should not be required or pushed upon students in an everyday life because of the negative impacts it’s brings along that not only affects students but also teachers causing harm in many ways .

Since students know that state test scores are a big thing in their future, some students would even cheat on their test to get a better score. Including, state testing does not provide feedback to get a better score next year so they won't know how they can get a better score the next year.(source- Pros and cons of standardized testing)

I agree that reporting the teacher would be the right thing to do. Cheating is unethical. You brought up a great point regarding the stress of state test. Our livelihoods depend on state testing. If you are not highly effective, then you are not a great teacher. Today, there are bonuses rewarded for students’ growth. These publicized bonuses make your effectiveness more noticeable. You want to receive the bonus to validate your effectiveness and hard work. The stress of state testing may push teachers to make wrong decisions. Nevertheless, educators need to think twice about making these bad decisions because jail time could be your consequence.

Many schools statewide are facing the contradictory topic of the exemption of standardized testing amongst their students. This format of assessing with American Education began in the middle 1800’s and grew when the NO Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) mandated testing in the US in 2002. These actions taken were said to mainly have been put in place to keep teachers and schools accountable for the assurance of those paying taxes and what government money is being spent on. Despite these comments, the vast majority of people would say that the proficiency level aligned with the state’s reading and math, find it to be an impossible goal to aim for. And throughout the course of time, multiple days in the school year have been eradicated with test

Standardized testing is a form of test that’s commonly used in today’s world, especially in here the United States. These tests check what your teacher taught students over the years they are in school, and the tests used constantly to assess our schools here in the United States. Aside from being used to evaluate the schools, colleges check the scores students receive to see if they would be willing to accept them. With how important these standardized tests have become, most states now require students to take them. The states have become dictatorial in determining what needs to be learned and what can be pushed over to the side to ensure that schools meet the benchmarks the states have made. These tests affect schools and education negatively and they completely eradicate the meaning of teaching.

Standardized testing is a multi-billion dollar industry. “Following the passage of the No Child Left Behind Act on January 8, 2002, annual state spending on standardized tests rose from $423 million to $1.1 billion in 2008, according to the Pew Center on the States” (ProCon,1). It is 2015- So common sense should tell us that number is much higher now. These dollar amounts place burdens on national and state budgets. It even can have an effect on the budget of a school system budget itself. Test prep classes and books are available and as mentioned before, “naturally affluent families, schools, and districts are better able to afford such products” (Kohn, 2). “The billion dollar industry is notorious for making costly and time consuming scoring errors” (ProCon, 3). Tests are often challenged by superintendents for accuracy and have to be regarded. These errors cost money. Money should be spent on something more efficient than just standardized tests. It should be invested in projects and programs that prepare students for real-world tasks-something we would all agree is

Schools and the state should not make students take standardized tests. First of all, for most of the test, the students have not learned the material. Also, it only examines how someone does that one day and not of the whole year. Lastly, some of these tests rate the school and teacher’s performance, and not actually seeing what the students are learning in class.

I am seeing that it is very unhealthy for students to be so stressed out over a test. School shouldn’t be stressful for students and stressful for the teachers. Standardized testing is good with keeping teachers in line with teaching the children certain courses within the year. It also helps keep schools to get funding that is necessary for them to stay open and provide the student’s needs. It is a very thin line whether schools should keep all of the testing or get rid of the testing. Maybe if they would try and get rid of all the emphasis they put on the testing throughout the year it would be better on the students. Constantly taking mock testing and assessments takes away from the student’s classwork and the teachers time with the students. Hopefully it will get better in time and the people that make the tests will get every glitch in testing

Another bases should be centered colleges and what they will accept. My affinity for not

I think they do put to much pressure on kids to take all of these tests. Lawmakers say they’re hearing loud and clear the message about too much unnecessary testing. New legislation might change the face of school testing.This spring, Congress will discuss education as lawmakers attempt to rewrite No Child Left Behind. The 2002 law was intended to close educational gaps between rich and poor districts. It required annual testing to make sure that children were learning what they were supposed to learn. The law also established severe consequences for schools whose test scores didn’t show enough progress.It would give the states, not the government, the job of ensuring that schools are doing good work. It also would let states decide what to

To start off with,I think that school boards are giving to much standarized testing to some schools that dont even learn all the stuff that be on all of the standarized test. And a 10% chance i think schools should still give testing but like at a medium size of tests because i think the state should see what each child learn. In all of the classes and see if that child is getting the stuff that child needs to move on in life and have a whole new begining of adult hood.So when i begin this essay i hope that you understand that the school board 90% chance is giving alot of standarized testing.And a 10% chance the school should give medium amount of test to see what the school teaches and what the students learn.

“Although tests can be telling and necessary at times it seems that tests are the end all and be all of students’ abilities and teacher effectiveness.” (Jennifer Crispo) It breaks my heart when I see the anxiety students have when taking the Regents exams. What’s more, I find it completely unfair that my students have to take this exam when their reading and writing fall well below grade level. They take this exam and receive a low grade causing them to feel defeated, when in reality they should be proud of the growth they have accomplished in their classes. These standardized test, although in logic make sense, don’t showcase the students’ growth. I get that with all the schools out there, it is important to have an assessment that almost normalizes grades and students’ success (obviously a student

I’ve always thought that the statewide and national testing system would be a lot better, if there were some flexibility. If only there were some kind of way to let teachers assess students’ learning, or remove all but the most important tests. Oh wait, there is. Many countries already have such systems, and these are some of the countries that the United States most admires in international education comparisons. Advocates of the current standardized testing system argue that standardized testing is good because it essentially gives a