Aristocracy Research Paper

What is a democracy? The denotative meaning of this is a type of government where the power is held by the citizens, and not by a single individual. Is it the best system? I do not know. However, everyone has a different point view about it, so did Walt Whitman. The author, for example, loved it and decided to celebrate it through his poems. In “A noiseless patient spider”, “I Hear America Singing”, and in “ When I Heard The Learn’d Astronomer”, Whitman uses themes, and catalogs to reflect his feelings about U.S. democracy.

Every form of government is bound to have some shortfalls. Different people have different views about the various political systems. But in today's world, democracy is considered to be the best form of government, reason being that people are treated equally and have full rights to live a life of their liking. Unlike a Oligarchy government is not considered to be a

“Democracy, like liberty or science or progress, is a word with which we are all so familiar tht we rarely take the trouble to ask what we mean by it.”

The American democracy is one of the most peaceful kinds of government in the world although it is a long way from utopia. The democracy in which we live has many strengths and weaknesses. Neither strengths or weaknesses out weigh one another, but it is necessary to have both due to the varying definitions. A democracy is a government that is run by the people. The politicians that we elect to run our government are human and they are susceptible to mistakes based on their own strengths and weaknesses. The strengths and weaknesses they possess are reflected into our government but at least “we the people” elect them and they are not chosen for us.

A government becomes an oligarchy if it starts with democratic principles when there are people that are able to rise to power due to wealth and can work to control the reins of government because of their amount of wealth. The government may need those individuals with a large amount of money to create jobs for citizens, to produce goods for trade, or simply to help finance or pay back loans. Due to the country’s financial predicament and the need of the wealthy, wealthy individuals are able to increase their commands with the use of their funds in order to gain more power and influence. In a democracy the government can control wealth through taxation by taxing the wealthier more, and the people have to vote, when taxes are proposed to be raised/lowered. By eliminating the vote they are able to have a tighter grip on the

I will first describe the meaning of each phrase and then I compare them. Monarchy is when the power and the discussions about a polis/state controlled from one person. Aristocracy is a small group of peoples that are the “elites” of the particular polis/state and the most wealthy ones, and is up to them to take the discussion of the polis/state. Usually the decisions that they take is was the most beneficial for them.

Aristocracy by comparison, is defined by brittanica.com (n.d.), as rule by a priveledged few or minority made up of those percieved as best qualified to be rulers, rather than a single monarch. The article continues to states that it's difficult to differentiate aristocracy from an

Dictators are very different from democracies because they view the government and world differently. Dictators think one way and democracy leaders think another way. Democracy has many rules to make it stay a democracy, but dictators make up their own rules.

Democracy is a unique type of government, and the purpose of this essay is to illustrate the strengths and weaknesses that a democratic government provides. I will detail that many components of this type of society are both strengths and weakness as each component has beneficial aspects as well as unavoidable pitfalls.

In a similar fashion as a royal regime, an aristocracy tries to represent the best according to virtue and virtue alone (Stanford). An aristocracy does not rely as much on one man as its royal counterpart would. The foundation of aristocracy is to rule by virtue, while considering the wealth of the society and most importantly, the people. As the aristocracy relies heavily upon virtue, it is said that the ideal leader for this regime would be a philosopher king, but because there is not one philosopher who is willing to rule the city (Stanford), there will be instead a handful of virtuous men who are willing to rule collectively. These leaders ensure that the aristocratic regime.

This compact little book is Volume III of a series entitled A History of England, edited by Lacey Baldwin Smith, and its inclusion in this series reveals much about its scope and intent. Smith writes in the Preface to the series that "their authors have tried by artistry to step beyond the usual confines of a textbook and conjure up something of the drama of politics, of the wealth of personalities, and even of the pettiness, as well as the greatness, of human motivation." Some of this can be found in The Age of Aristocracy; some of it cannot. William B. Willcox's device for covering the significant people and events of one hundred forty-two years in only two hundred thirty-seven pages is to

Monarchies would be fantastic if the royal family is perfect and ruled fairly for the good of its people, but the lavish lives that have been historically accompanied to royalty have created an almost religious type of support. After years of royalty leading the public, its disciples begin to follow blindly and without any control of the government or say in decisions being made. If the position of King or Queen was low-key such as the current prime minister, or presidential positions there might not be so much opposition from the public. As the royal family is busy having 10 course meals in lavish clothing and living spaces, its people are often in the streets with little money for food or basic clothing. This is the most condescending aspect of the status of royalty who are accompanied by butlers and servants around the clock. How can they relate to its common people if they don’t know what it’s like to live in the real world and not some fantasy? How can a person be in favor for a King to rule your country in absolute control who has never worked for any achievements other than being born by the right parents?

Democracy varies in every country depending on the type of government or regime they have. There is the liberal democracy, which is all about giving people their rights and liberties; everything is done through fair voting and electing. The people are aware of everything that happens in their government. Illiberal democracies are basically the same as liberal, but the people in power are more secretive of their activities, and there is less civil liberty. It is essentially a partial democracy. Now Authoritarian regimes designate any political system that concentrates power in the hands of one leader or a small elite. There are no free elections and very little regard for the law. Political institutions, social structures, and the democratic rule of law all affect liberal, illiberal, and authoritarian regimes democratic quality differently.

Aristocracy as a form of government is ruled by a philosopher king, and has it its base wisdom and reason. Ideal state is composed of 3 casts like parts: ruling cast made of kings, auxiliaries cast made of soldiers, and the majority of the people, who are allowed to own property and produce goods for themselves, but are required to sustain their rulers.

“Democracy is the worst form of government, except for all those other forms that have been tried from time to time”, Churchill words immortalize democracy as the way to go, but there is not one