Army Mandatory Essay

The United States of America is the nation with the largest, most powerful, and most funded military. The United States has been known to commonly get involved with other nations purely based off the fact that it is militarily capable. In the past the United States has had to implement several drafts to support the military’s need for more troops. The question is, in this day and age, would it be acceptable for the United States to order a national mandatory military conscription to fuel the military? There are always those that are exempt from military service, as well as those who cannot be exempt which increases the gap of inequality which will harm some more than others. Due to evidence presented in previous conscription efforts, possible

Recruitment of the United States military is a vital part of maintaining an all volunteer military force. Because of recent world events and the high operations tempo of the military, Army has had some problems with its recruitment. Convincing civilians to sign up to be a solider can be a tough job when it requires being sent 7,000 miles from home to go fight in a war zone. What can recruiters do to keep

The United states national anthem, The Star-Spangled Banner, states: "Land of the free, home of the brave." This patriotic song adopted by the United States as our national anthem to express our nation's identity is no longer justified in relations with females being required to be drafted into the military. The word required emphasizes that this is not the "land of the free" because the United States is making it a requirement for citizens to be forced into the military out of their own free will. Furthermore, the anthem states "home of the brave", but people are not being brave when they are being forced. Bravery means having courage and being ready to face anything that comes your way, but if the military is making it a requirement to those

Many people are concerned about the U.S. military because of how many risks come with joining it. However, the U.S. military also explains the benefits that one could receive. Joining the military is a decision that should not be taken lightly. One must understand all aspects of the military. In order for a voter to be fully informed about joining the US military, one must consider both the risks, like mental illnesses and commitment and benefits, like education, and experience.

Post 9-11 military enlistment numbers spiked because individuals wanted to serve and protect our recently attacked country and our way of life. If individuals are forced to participate in a military campaign, the government will be relieved of one of the checks that help prevent them from engaging in unpopular or unwarranted campaigns.

While many people believe that an all-volunteer service could be more efficient, the United States government should institute a combination of a draft and volunteer service as its military service profile. An all-volunteer service is one which derives its manpower from volunteers rather than conscription or mandatory service. Conscription (or drafting) is the compulsory enlistment of people in some sort of national service, such as military service. Many arguments are presented in support of both the draft and the all-volunteer force. These arguments are analyzed in the following categories: military effectiveness; cost and other economic considerations; and morality. Even though the United States changed to an all-volunteer service in 1973, the country reserves the right to renew conscription in the event of an emergency.

The first reason why everyone should join the U.S. Military is because of the financial benefits. The payment is really for everyone who

Why The Military Can Change You The selective service act was passed in 1917 creating a way for the United States to increase its military power. This gave many young men and women a way to learn new skills and do something that would positively affect their families, communities and ultimately their country; furthermore, the selective service system is also a way for our country to protect the freedoms of our people and in some cases the freedoms of others. Most young adults in the U.S. today want to do a job that will better their family, community, and country and serving in the military is considered by many to be the best way for young adults to learn morales and leadership skills they couldn’t learn anywhere else.

The United States Armed Forces was founded in 1775. As of December 2013, 40 million men and women have served in the US Military (McGaugh). While a lot has changed over those years, and improvements have been made, it’s not hard to see that our service members are clearly undervalued. The men and women who serve our country risk their lives every day, and a large number never return home. Those who do return home often deal with physical and psychological challenges. It’s our job as a country to make sure these men and women are getting all that they deserve.

Most people have, at one point or another, considered what they were going to do with their lives. Whether a person would like to become an activist, an artisan or a business professional, the military has something for everyone. Finding a path in life is often filled with uncertainty and procrastination. The United States military is a path in itself, should one wish to retire from it; however, should a person wish to make their own path, there are benefits for that as well that can remove all doubt and curb procrastination. Due to these many benefits, I believe that it should be mandatory for all adults to enlist for a minimum of twenty-four months.

I doubt that anyone thinks that everyone has a right to come on campus and recruit…. It is unlikely that many of us would want to let the Mafia come and recruit, for example. That’s because they have a reputation for killing. The military services have such a reputation as well. Essentially, when one signs a contract with the military, one signs oneself into bondage, pledged to kill on demand…. It may be said that the Mafia analogy is a spurious one, but certainly not to the many victims of the U.S. military since WW II.”—Roger Haekins, Daily Guardian, University of California, San Diego (May 15, 1999)

I should be permitted to go into the military. I should be permitted because I am proud of my country.  I should be permitted because being in the military is not as deadly as my other options. I should be permitted because I can make a diffence. My opponents claim that I should not make the choice to go in to the military. It is my chose to do whatever I want to do like go into the military or be a cop. Many people feel that I would waste my life for no reason. This view is not the trueth for me and other like me because we are fighting and helping for the people that live in that area. All though it may be that there are devises out there that are devastating. What this idea fails to recognize is that there are devises like that but the US

In the essay, “What You Can Do For Your Country,” James Herbert Bushman speaks of instituting a mandatory military service requirement of three years, starting before the age of twenty-four. Bushman states his belief that as a requisite of citizenship, you must serve in a branch of the military. He claims that a necessary service will benefit more than only the military, but will benefit individual people as well by increasing the feeling of unity, the knowledge and skillset of the individual, and will grant equal pay and benefits for all in service. Bushman suggests that everyone who is unwilling to serve their country is no better than a freeloader or a beggar on a street corner, mooching off others’ efforts and earnings. Similarly, he repeats the old phrase ‘freedom is not free,’ and insinuates that everyone must work equally for their share of freedom.

Another benefit of mandating the service of young adults is that they would be disciplined and setup for success in life as a productive citizen of the United States. Military boot camp is designed to break the recruit down to where they are not better than any other recruit, and then they train them to do their best in every task they approach. This creates unrivaled discipline and extreme excellence in every operation the United States military executes. Not only will this be useful while in military service, but also when they begin to operate in the working world. This requirement will unify the working force as a result of the mandated service. Businesses will be able to work efficiently and accurately in all that they accomplish. Again, this will improve the United States as a country. Why would the United States refuse this mandate? The only reason would be that they bring the law down to the lowest denominator of the few people who argue with the benefits. These people might say that not all people are designed to be in the military. However, the military has jobs for every make and model. Every talent is useful to the military. Making young adult serve in the military for two years would actually give them time to figure out what their future career is meant to be. Some people cannot ever be satisfied, and would object to anything! On the contrary, decisions that have the abundance of benefits as mandating service for young

Having military service be required could strengthen the country. Having military service be required could promote equality amongst citizens. With everyone having a mutual respect for each other, based on their shared experiences, there may even be a decrease in crime. As well as making the people more respectful of each other there would always be an active military in the country. There is a little to disagree with this argument. First of all, yes a mutual respect in our country would be nice, but there would also be people who do not qualify for military service, and there are even people now who believe that women should not be in the military. This would create a second class citizen of those who cannot serve. There may even be radical groups who for to try and abolish women from the military. Second, even though we would always have a standing military the quality of that military would be severely compromised. If the people there do not want to be there they won't put effort into their work. On the other hand is we keep the military as volunteer only, the people there actually want to be there, so we can always guarantee the quality of our