1. The risk management plan was considered unnecessary because it was not a part of the contract and A corporation was concerned that the Army would abolish the project if they performed a risk management plan and the estimated cost increased substantially.
2. Risk management should be done at all stages. The initial assessment should be made in the proposal stage then the assessment should be revised and reevaluated throughout the projects life. New risks will become apparent at different stages and other ones will change with different circumstances.
3. No, but the customer expects the project manager to be skilled and experienced enough to be able to know potential threats that could hurt the project. If the contract doesn’t say specifically
…show more content…
No, the customer should not be a part of the risk management plan. The management team should consider the timing the customer wants the project done in evaluating risk but that’s it. If the customer knew all the risks that a project could face then it might give them cold feet to continue. The management team should brainstorm all the potential risks then evaluate the most important or most likely ones then the customer should be filled in on the end result of the risk management plan.
7. The Army might have responded negatively to the risk management plan early in the Research and Development activities. If the Army knew that the estimated percentage of the reached specifications were 60%-70% they might try to find another contractor that could beat that percentage.
8. It would not be very effective if budget overruns and schedule slips are always allowed. One of the most important aspects to the risk management plan is staying on budget and on time. So when those kind of things are allowed and not discouraged it makes the project more costly and drag out
…show more content…
Severe optimism or pessimism can affect the development of a risk management plan because when determining risks it matters whether someone a looking at the glass half full versus someone looking at the glass half empty. Someone who is looking at a glass half full will not be open minded to more potential risks then the half empty person would. “Promote a climate that recognizes the value of risk management. Strange as it may seem, many project managers are criticized for identifying risks and developing contingency plans: they are accused of pessimism or planning to fail. These project managers should receive praise rather than criticism because they are investing in avoiding obstacles, solving problems before they arise; the ultimate act of proactive management.” (Verzuh,
The course text discusses AS/NZS 4360 approach, which consists of a 5-phase process to manage and control risk. According to the text the risk management process phases are establish context, identify, establish and treat risk while continuously communicating, monitoring and reviewing risk (Cooper, 2005). The premise of risk management is to uncover and understand as much as possible about risks as early in the project as possible. The more one knows about risks the easier it is to make decisions for correct responses. The alternative to risk management is crises management, which in many instances is more costly, and more time consuming. Clements & Gido define a project as “an endeavor to accomplish a specific objective through a unique set of interrelated tasks and the effective utilization of resource “(Gido 4). I had many opportunities to develop a Military Retirement Ceremony, so I decided to approach it as a project risk management plan. At the time I did not know it but we were using the project risk management approach discussed in the text to address the risk associated with the event. The Military Retirement Ceremony project planning began the same as most projects do by determining the objectives. The objectives are described in terms of deliverable, schedule and budget. The sponsor and the customer must agree upon the scope of any project. In this project I worked along side the sponsors.
1. Planning Risks: Inadequate time to plan, allocate resources and scheduling thoroughly for projects completions and budget parameters.
All efforts will be made by the Project Manager to plan for and handle any risks. Continual risk monitoring will be done by the project manager throughout the projects duration.
Risk or threat is common and found in various fields of daily life and business. This concept of risk is found in various stages of development and execution of a project. Risks in a project can mean there is a chance that the project will result in total failure, increase of project costs, and an extension in project duration which means a great deal of setbacks for the company. The process of risk management is composed of identifying, assessing, mitigating, and managing the risks of the project. It
Regardless of the type of project being initiated, planned and implemented, building a culture of risk management is indispensable for the successful completion of the project.
Risks management is an important step during the process of a project. Failing to manage a risk may result in unforeseen event happening and a project’s failure. For example, with limited budget, an unforeseen event or an accident occurs in the middle of a project and this matter has not been considered and needs a big sum of expense, then the project may be stopped because of this unexpected event. We should know it is necessary to understand how to identify risks and assumptions based on the information. After identifying risks, it is important for project managers to set contingency plans to prevent and deal with these risks when they occur. Of course, several problems may happen during considering
Risk Management. Risk Management must be a continuous activity throughout our project in order to prevent risks becoming issues. Thus, “risks” will be a topic at every meeting during project implementation.
Definition: A Risk is an unwanted situation which might arise in an organization which might lead to negative impact on the desired result. Risk management plans involves the analyzing, managing and evaluating the projects risk and threats. It involves layout of the entire project i.e from the beginning during and after results of the project.
The procedure that the project team will use to manage project risks is defined in the planning stage, documented in the project plan, and executed throughout the life of the project. The scope of the risk management plan is dependent on the size, cost, complexity,
The point that Kippenberger (2000) is making in his article titled ‘there’s no such thing as risk free project’ is that almost everything we do in a project involves a risk of some kind – by so saying, it is therefore essential that we are prepared or able to deal with risks. Most literature puts emphasis on the negative connotation that the word ‘risk’ carries. For instance, Chapman and Ward (2003) provide the meaning of risk as: hazard, chance of bad consequences, loss, and exposure to chance of injury or loss. Galway (2004) defines risk as an event which is uncertain and has negative impact, and similarly, Martin (2008: 38) defines risk as the ‘chance of something occurring that has an adverse effect on the project’. This negativity highlights the fact that problems can occur or things can go wrong and it is therefore important to have a systematic approach to managing them. Therefore in project management, risk management is necessary to increase the chances of the proposed project succeeding.
The management has to plan for the risk. The steps above call for the planning of risk. Some risks are urgent, others must be immediate, and others essential. All these risks require special attention. Therefore, the management must plan on how to al with the risks depending on
One well accepted description of risk management is the following: risk management is a systematic approach to setting the best course of action under uncertainty by identifying, assessing, understanding, acting on and communicating risk issues. In order to apply risk management effectively, it is vital that a risk management culture be developed. The risk management culture supports the overall vision, mission and objectives of an organization. Limits and boundaries are established and communicated concerning what are acceptable risk practices and outcomes. Since risk management is directed at uncertainty related to future events and outcomes, it is
Managing risk is an important task for any project manager. After s/he has determined what risks exist for the project and assessed their importance, s/he needs to choose a strategy for dealing with each risk if and when it comes into play. According to Swanson, the risk assessment is critical because it enables the person responsible for contingency planning to focus risk management efforts and resources in a prioritized manner only on the identified risks. The risk management process includes the risk assessment and determination of suitable technical, management, and operational security controls based on the level of threat the risk imposes (Swanson, 2001). Minimize the chances that the risk will occur, develop
Developing an effective Risk Management Plan is an important part of any project. Unfortunately, this step is often avoided with the "deal with it later" attitude. If everything goes smoothly and without incident, that approach does no harm. But normally, issues do arise and without a well developed plan, even small issues can become emergencies.
Risk allocation is performed as part of the development of the project structure, which takes into account the distribution of responsibilities and risks during the planning, construction, financing and operating phases (Corner, 2006). The aim is to identify an efficient and effective structure that optimises the costs of the project and ensures that the risk occurrences do not damage the project (Delmon, 2009). According to Grimsey and Lewis (2007) risk allocation has two elements: optimal risk management and value for money. The first implies that the