Article 138 Complaint

Corporate advantage is often times very controversial in government, from funding candidates with money, to swaying the mind of the voters, to making PACs and superPACs; this topic is not at rest with the F.E.C. or other government programs or agencies. In this case we see “Citizens United” ,a special interest group, fight with the F.E.C. about this advantage and the right to set restrictions on spending money for the purpose of engaging in political speech. In a 5-4 decision, Some may think that the court ruled correctly on corporate expenditures ; yet lots of people think that this advantage is corrupt, here’s why.

On the first day 19th of July, “Declaration of Sentiments and Grievances” were present. Thomas Jefferson primarily wrote the declaration it contains 18 charges against George III, the King of England. In repeated injuries on part of man towards woman, includes that the denial of right to vote, unfair law regarding separation and divorce, inequality of religion, education and employment and as well in other fields. Apart from that, it includes 12 resolutions for equal participation of women in every field.

By 1765, at a Stamp Act Congress, all but four colonies were represented as the “Declaration of Rights and Grievances” was passed. They were determined to let Parliament know that they were equal to British citizens, that there would be no “taxation without representation,” and all efforts to stop tax on colonists would continue (Kennedy, etal 2011.) Although Lord Rockingham, the predecessor of Grenville, sought to repeal of the Stamp Act, this in no way meant Parliament was conceding their control. In fact, while the Stamp Act was repealed, another called the “Declaratory Act of 1766,” gave Parliament the authority to make laws binding the American Colonies, “in all cases whatsoever.” In 1767, George III passed the Townshend Acts to collect tax on glass, lead, paints, paper and, tea. Recognizing that tea was a favorite among the Americans, it ensured greater revenue the British government. Again, the colonists’ rights for representation were ignored and they started to boycott British goods and ultimately, smuggle tea. When the Quartering Act was passed, which specified that colonists were to give room and board to British troops, tension began to rise. For two years, the colonists tolerated British troops on their soil and their dissatisfaction with the British Parliament and King George III became evident through many violent riots, abusiveness of tax collectors and destruction of property. According to Kennedy, etal (2011), Parliament, continually met with

Article II, Section IV of the United States Constitution states that: “The President, Vice President and all Civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.” Throughout the course of American history, past Presidents have committed actions that have brought up the discussion and even started the process of impeachment from holding office. In the chapter “Impeachment in the Constitutional Order” by Jeffery K. Tulis, he talks about the differences between the legalistic and political interpretations of impeachment and how to properly use the process in a successful manner. Tulis states “how and why the impeachment process, far from politically irrelevant, is a vital attribute of the theoretical architecture of a well- functioning separation of powers regime” (Tulis 229).

On December 27, 2016, Plaintiff filed his Amended Complaint and named Neven, Nash, Pugh, and Rainone as defendants. Again, Plaintiff never named Cox as a defendant, despite being listed as a defendant for Count VI. Plaintiff did not serve Neven, Nash, and Pugh until May 10, 2017, which is 134 days from the time the Amended Complaint was filed. Defendants Cox and Rainone have yet to be served. Plaintiff will not be able to show good cause as to why service was not completed within 120 days. Furthermore, Plaintiff attempted to make a motion to extend time to serve, but Plaintiff did not file it as required by Eighth Judicial District Court Rules. Plaintiff offered no memorandum of authority and only stated his reasoning for an extension. Pursuant

Consumers will submit their consumer complaints to the Congress of the United States. The letter will be from a House of Representative or Senate representative. When a complaint of this nature is received, CIT 246 is opened and used for tracking all Congressional Complaints. These are handled in the same manner as the regulatory complaints.

On Wednesday, October 7, 2015 at approximately 1:35pm NYP employee / cashier Desiree Townes came in to security to file a report of harassment.

The representatives of the United States listed 27 grievances, or complaints explaining why they wished to separate themselves from their mother country. Some of the worst complaints included the grievance saying how the King had basically declared war on the colonies by burning their towns and killing their citizens, the King had closed their port into the world to trade, and how the King had made his soldiers immune to civil law and could create their own rules. The King was allowing his land to be attacked mercilessly. The colonists were being murdered savagely and having their lives ruined and all the King said was how they were “out of his protection.” That must have been such a helpless feeling; not being able to protect yourself because

Paul Keller is a countdown technician for the Cape Kennedy complex in Brevard County, Florida. Mr. Keller, his wife Naomi, and their young daughter moved from Minneapolis during the Space Age. Hoping the relocation and the new job would make their family problems disappear, Mr. Keller embraced the challenges at work.

Does Plaintiff’s amended complaint relate back to the original complaint so that it may avoid the statute of limitations?

In the Federal Constitution, article 10 is the key to the second part of the Constitution. Here are some basic liberties we have set up recently. In general, Article 10 relates only to the standards, controls and restrictions that Malaysians have the right to independently publish, collect and evaluate. As a native, we are lucky to say what we need. However, we have the same rights, but article 10 (2) (a) (b) (c) clearly states the right of parliament to impose

There are most definitely ways that my business could be exposed to breach of warranty claims do to the nature of the product. My company could be subject to both an expressed and implied breach of warranty if my product fails to fulfill my written stated requirements on both quality and effectiveness of my product, a selectively inhibiting hair growth product. Due to the fact that my product would be a one of a kind on the market, I would create an expressed warranty to ensure potentially skeptical consumers that my product does indeed work, potentially even creating an expressed warranty that includes a money back guarantee. Misrepresentation could also be claimed by a plaintiff if my product falsely advertises that it inhibits hair growth. The implied warranty of merchantability could be breached if indeed my product did not inhibit hair growth, as my product would not fulfill the original purpose the product was created for.

The expression Public Interest Litigation literally means “some litigation conducted for the benefit of public or for removal of some public grievances”. Public interest litigation means litigation for public good. It means litigation in a court of law is initiated, by any person or group of persons or an organization who may be third party or outsider to the matter and not necessarily the aggrieved party.

Usually, when the statute of limitations (SOL) has run on a claim the defendant can raise the defense of a 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss the claim because the claim has fallen outside of the SOL period; however, in certain cases it is not reasonably possible for a person to know that an action in law has occurred. In this instance, it would not be fair to make a person responsible to bring a case in a timely fashion, if he or she did not know that a case should be brought. In a case where it is not immediately apparent that an error has occurred and a case could be brought, the SOL begins to run when a person has discovered, or in the exercise of reasonable care should have discovered the error due to another’s negligence. Jon

Since the project is solely based in England and is a civil and structural project which is not publicly procured, the only viable legal contracts are JCT and NEC. Mumin Consulting prefers the NEC contract over the JCT because the JCT contract considers time and money as two different concepts. Whereas in the NEC contract, there is a compensation even which deals with both time and money. The NEC contract is dealt in real time as much as possible and it is process driven. Another reason for considering the NEC over the JCT is that, in the JCT contract, the ground risk is with the contractor. But the NEC contract uses the ICE foreseeability test in relation to ground conditions (Hugh James, 2014)