Article Analysis : Invading My Privacy

With the internet gaining such popularity, privacy has become a thing of the past. People have come to accept that strangers can view personal information about them on social networks such as facebook, and companies and the government are constantly viewing peoples’ activity online for a variety of reasons. The government has attempted to help the consumer regain their privacy online by passing the Consumer Internet Privacy Protection Act of 1997, although it is difficult to enforce and has become outdated with the fast-moving tendency of the constantly changing internet. Some companies including yahoo and google have come under scrutiny about violating

In the text “A Surveillance Society,”, authors William E. Thompson and Joseph V. Hickey provided information about growing surveillance trends, new types of technology, and the impact of the surveillance. First, many surveillance trends are becoming more popular all throughout the world. Today, there are cameras everywhere you go, whether it is on the streets or in grocery stores, almost all of the time people are being watched. Since the technology of surveillance is more common, a lot of people are being photographed many times during the day. Even if it is not a photograph of your face, the cameras can photograph your license plate and link the car back to you. A main reason these surveillance trends are growing

Since the 9/11 attacks in 2001, the United States government has been going doing everything it can in an effort to protect the citizens of the United states. However, the government has gone too far by secretly building a database with every phone call made in America in it. According to the Tracked in America organization, “During national crises, the United States Government often reacts overzealously. It takes actions to curtail the guaranteed rights of the people.” The government has proven this theory all throughout its history, and is continuing this tradition of overzealous reactions by its implementation of Section 215 of the USA PATRIOT ACT. Patrick Leahy, a senator from Vermont, said, “Section 215 of the

College students of today all exist in an age of growing interest and usage of the internet. We all use the internet for various different reasons; writing papers, studying, Netflix, Youtube, social media, etc. With this expanding network of students, it should be apparent for everyone that they know the ways and knowledge that is essential to protect their privacy from those who want to strip it away.

The article “A Surveillance Society” by William E. Thompson and Joseph V. Hickey is about how surveillance technology has changed over the years. The article explains the different types of surveillance cameras that exist. Why security and surveillance has grown to be the norm. The article shows the trends with other countries in the world and what they have done with the new technology. The impact of surveillance on people’s lives and what is done with the recordings and pictures is also shared throughout the article. Big brother is explained, information sharing and the information that is shared is also explained. The article identifies cameras that can be used for surveillance, like pinhole cameras. The reason why cameras became the norm

I think invasion of privacy is a criminal act. How can people do such a thing when there are other criminals that we call hackers? Every day I used use Facebook as a way to communicate with other. Most of the time I like to post positive things so that others can get a good piece of inspiration. So do these stockers get anything out of what I post? I hope because they are truly sinister and need a reality check.

Since the files cross the threshold of being “personnel” or “similar” files, the court must determine whether Joe Smith has a substantial privacy interest in withholding the documents. Two factors display a substantial privacy interest: (1) The Forest Service made a promise of confidentiality. (2) Whistleblowers have a substantial privacy interest to ensure they do not become victims of harassment, retaliation, or any other harmful acts. Therefore, disclosing these files constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy, and these cogent points demonstrate it.

While I believe that workers should have privacy in their own homes, I also believe that having their actions monitored can benefit the companies that employ them. In the article, there is a line that states, “Employees, of course, resent the relentless monitoring. One UPS driver told Harper’s that the company used performance metrics like “a mental whip,” adding, “People get intimidated and they work faster.”” (The Week). Some may view the idea of a mental whip as a horrible crime against workers, but accessing workers’ activities while on the job is holding these persons accountable for their actions. If a worker is taking too many breaks while driving a UPS truck, if a restaurant cook is on his phone too much during work hours, if a nurse

Nowadays, while most people are enjoying the amazing changes that the technology has brought to us, there are some other folks in somewhere secretly observing us and collecting our information without letting us aware. “Transparency is for those who carry out public duties and exercise public power. Privacy is for everyone else” (Greenwald 201). Many people claim that they have nothing to worry because they don’t have anything to hide, they even say if people are concerned or scared about this is, it’s because they are doing something unpresentable and they could be guilty .

Most importantly, he describes a twilight between public and private. For example, while people may have a conversation in a public restaurant, surely they would not want their “private” conversation recorded and put on the internet. Second, people expect a bit of anonymity when in public. Who would want their purchase of hemorrhoid cream to appear on the internet? Here even though the product is bought at a public place there still is a sense of privacy expected. Third, consider the difference between a casual observance of behavior and scrutinizing the behavior online for enhanced detail. A casual observance is subject to fleeting memory, whereas the photos or video has permanence, especially when posted on a social media platform (p. 164-166). That leads to how social circles can be used to help define the expectations of privacy. Social Network Theory seeks to explain how random people are connected by various different social circles and cliques. Law Professor Lior Strahilevitz points out through diverse social circles unintended links break down the degrees of separation. The farmer in Omaha might gossip about a friend’s adulteries without realizing that information can travel clear across the country to an unknown social circle that has a connection in an unidentified way. However, for the names and content to

Technological advances have altered human life in both negative and positive ways. One negative aspect is the invasion of privacy. While the risk for invasion of privacy is greater in the age of big data, the benefits for society as a whole is greater as well. In this essay, I address how to weigh the tension between sharing clinical data, protecting a subject’s privacy and honoring a subject’s preference as it relates to human research. However, before an assessment can be made on how to weigh these variables, it is crucial to first identify the principles embedded within the current topic and then understanding how the principles apply to the topic. So, to make this assessment, I begin with identifying how the principle of autonomy applies to sharing clinical data.

Social Media catalyzed the interactivity of the internet by allowing average users to generate content as easily as they could view it. This encouraged people to share themselves online on social media profiles. Many users were blown away by the possibilities online and satisfied to use online services for free without considering what was in it for the online service. Many people do not understand the large costs that can be associated with a large national or international website or application, especially one that allows users to have interactions and one that lets users upload content to be made instantly available to everyone else. However, companies offer their services for free, so

Why should I worry about privacy and security? I'm not a criminal or a terrorist. I've got nothing to hide. These are things that most people think. They also believe the internet is much more secure and that their personal information is only available to them, whereas this is actually quite wrong.

Public and private information/ they are responsible for educating users to properly conduct themselves to protect the way individuals are viewed and perceived online. This way the corporation can better protect the individual member, regulating positive and negative impacts to individual character online, while still marketing and extracting private information for future corporate uses, yet to be determined. Better explanations are also needed to explain the basic information needed to guide people to understanding the “social media” guidelines as well as implications made from participating in online media forums. First, social networking media are not true public spaces. Facebook, MySpace, and other such networks are privately owned

The internet is a very useful tool to help almost all of the individuals in their daily life activities. With the advent of the internet, people are also able to talk to their loved ones who are living in the far-flung areas. Employers are also recruiting the employees from the different areas of the world to increase diversity in their teams. Because of all these activities, it is critical for the people to protect their identities while using the internet because it is not a very safe communication channel. Various hackers in the world can access almost anything that is available on the internet. Internet privacy includes the privilege or order of individual protection concerning the putting away, procurement to outsiders, and showing of data relating to oneself through the Internet. Internet privacy is a subset of PC protection.