Article Analysis Of The North Korean Missile Launch

Speed, immediacy, global reach- the Internet provides vast, new opportunities for the distribution and reception of news. I had spent the past two weeks, Feb. 13- Feb. 28, observing the front-pages of CNN and Fox News online. Because both are powerful news networks, I focused my attention on the top-featured stories displayed on both web pages, and if stories were featured on both, did the news networks portray the stories similarly or differently. A lot of my attention was also focused on the diversity of both CNN and Fox News. I reviewed diversity by analyzing the difference in headlines, content throughout the story and the writers and reporters.

The PBS anchor was one woman with little to no makeup on, and dressed more conservative, while on the fox news there were two anchors, a man and a woman dressed more professional with a suit and the woman wearing a little more revealing dress. When delivering the news, PBS has their stories last approximately ten minutes and for this specific day, they focused more about France and their presidential election while the fox news touched the surface on France but talked about a shooting that occurred over there. The fox news lacked detailed stories because jumped to recent events rather quickly. For example, Fox talked about wall street, the weather, France, tragic events and deaths, for less than 10 minutes each, making it hard to understand the importance of each event. While the anchors from Fox would communicate with a third person located in another area to give their reports, the PBS anchor gives a more intimate connection with her reports, by showing the events that are occurring then talking about them right after, she would also give interviews with people one on one, like she did with the united nation security general. The news being distributed in different ways, the Fox news hold a more emotional appeal to their viewers because the audience who watch fox news are from around the area and are familiar with the events that occur. The Fox news give the stories and weather updates that the local viewers need to know because it has a relevant purpose to their lives, compared to the PBS news, that gives educational but irrelevant news because their news does not provide current issues that can affect the viewer’s life. The PBS news gives an appeal to facts rather than an emotional appeal because it states facts that happen around the world but not about close events that can connect to the viewer personally. Overall the news is a

As a result, news stories vary from one to another. In this case, the story written by CNN is more descriptive as to what occurred, along with criticizing the President and his administration for lack of attention this event is receiving on their behalf. MSNBC gave a short summary as to what occurred but made sure to criticize the President for not voicing his concern over this issue, claiming that he only uses his twitter account for concerns of his interests, but not of those of a president. Fox News, on the other hand, simply delivered what had occurred regarding the casualty and briefly touched on the fact that the Trump administration has not made many statements regarding the

Many stories are written in a positive or negative way to make a event seem in a negative or a positive way. Each news source has a way of tell how an event happened whether it is true or false information. Most of the time a news station hears about an event occurring and tries to be apart of it by telling the story but the source does not always have all the details so it is not credible. Usually by the day after the event occurs is when the media is a little more accurate with the details, but not one hundred percent yet. If one does not check different news sources for the same event to check the informations, the source can mislead the person and give false information. A news station like Fox News believes in personal responsibility and limited government, where ABC News believes in government actions for equal opportunity. With having different view neither source will be exactly the same because both have different ways of writ ring and

Media sources are categorized as liberal or conservative, both have some similarities, but are also quite different. CBS News is considered a liberal source and one of the breaking news story’s headline on their website is, ‘Tulsa cop charged in death of unarmed black man’ while CNN has this headline, ‘Officer Charged : Tulsa police officer faces manslaughter charge in shooting.’ (CNN) Although they both have the same headline they both have different articles geared towards different views. CNN gears toward the side of the victim’s family, such as inserting several quotes stating, “ This is a small victory” Crutcher’s twin sister Tiffany said, as well as, “The chain breaks here. We’re going to break the chains of police brutality,” she added, “We know the history.” (CNN) While, CBS rarely adds the viewpoint of the victim’s family, except for one that talks about Crutcher’s family relieved for the closing and that the family is “preparing for war.” (CBS) In this case these news sources use the objective of Bias by spin, because they spin towards one side or the other, and uses tone to persuade the reader to one side or the

All three sources took either a neutral, minor, or highly biased position where the CBS article, the “Our Families Are Under Attack, So We Rise Up” article, and the “No Release for State Dreamer” article. While it is the essential job for the media to stay neutral, these mass media outlets are the ones that harbor the responsibility for perpetuation of misinformation due to their chosen pieces of research and evidence that they decide to integrate into their articles for all of the media to

The story was more descriptive also, using more words to “paint a picture”. Less focus was placed on the minor events, such as the governor surviving the bomb, and more towards events directly related to the election, for example, the affect killing 30 civilians had on last year’s election. The way the article was presented was somewhat annoying. There were no complete paragraphs throughout the entire article and after almost every sentence, a new line was created. The information though, was put together very well. Each topic led into the other smoothly and details were placed in the right area to support other sentences. The links on this site were the same as the others. There were options to share the article and ads at the bottom of the page. One thing that the FOXNews site had were links that were titled “You Might Also Be Interested

The first article is a story done by National Public Radio, a non-profit media organization that is

It is clear that in each article I was only getting one side not the full report of the story. However, I do feel that CNN.com did a more accurate look at my topic, which was the Pope at the Paris Summit. The reason I believe that U.S. News’s article is not as good of a news source because when reading it, reads more like a complaint, or a letter to the editor type article than an actual news article on the topic of the Paris Summit. The U.S. News article only had one source and he was a self proclaimed official source, where as the CNN.com piece actually had quotes from several of the different members that were at the summit as well has official comments from Pope Francis. Also the CNN.com piece was worded nicely and had an air throughout the piece of just wanting to give the facts of the story, whereas the U.S News article was force feeding complaints and used wording that almost half way through I just wanted to stop reading because it was an opinion packed piece and only really a few times hinted at facts. Therefore, I would have to say that the CNN.com piece not only gave me facts that I wanted to learn it also peaked my interest in the topic and made me want to go out and research more about the topic from other sites, which I feel is good journalism because it’s hooked the reader unlike the U.S. News piece that was not very factual and made me want to stop

The clear distinction comes with the content of the pictures and again it revolves around the interests of organizations: money and social issues. One major difference and an unexpected part was the ad for Oracle in the WSJ which took up as much space if not more than the Reid commentary, the Russian test, or even the picture from the Atlanta crisis. The length of the Google article was also distinct, where the NYT gave a full column, the WSJ gave it a small paragraph. Another point to note is the display and position of the headlines or newsfeed. The WSJ had two broad

When watching Fox News and CNN on October 3rd, two days after the Las Vegas Massacre when discussing this topic, which is a very sore topic to be talking about both the news channels responded in ways that anyone would to finding out about this horrible crime that was committed. When watching Fox News cover the Massacre they were able to get a call into country singer, Jake Owens, who was on the side of the stage, when the shots first started whereas on CNN they were only giving out the information and updates that was allowed to be told to the public. Immediately after I watched the news I read the New York Times newspaper and the Wall Street Journal for the dates of October 4th and 5th on gun violence and the Las Vegas Massacre. When looking for writings on the Las Vegas Massacre I realized that the pickings were slim and that they did not have any summaries on what occurred on October 1st but they did have articles on how much it would be to pay back the police, EMT’s and others who helped out after the massacre and things found on his computer that he had searched for SWAT tactics and investigators found that there was a flash drive missing from the computer that Stephen had probably destroyed. When watching CNN and Fox News again a week later I found that the questions of whether or not gun control was going to be put in place to stop crazy events like this again. The CNN news had a very strong view of guns being bad and for supporting gun laws whereas Fox

The New York Times includes important sources thato help the reader feel more secure about the information given. The type of propaganda that the journalists Mark Landler and Jonathan Weisman often used thewas Testimonial device. The New York Times’ quotes in the article were by people who are well- known by the populace. A quote stated by someone who is well recognized generally helps the reader believe what is being said versus a quote by a person who is not well recognized. This is why Landler and Weisman decided to include President Obama and Secretary of¬ State John Kerry in for quotes in their article. By using these individuals, it also links the story and helps verify the information that was given to the targeted audience. End The Lie’s article had numerous quotes, but some were by recognizable people and others were anonymous. Having an anonymous source in an article is skeptical because anyone could have said it, and that person may not know much about the Russian proposal or the any other diplomatic path that is trying to be focusedsolutions. Also, on or the journalist could have easily added their own opinion by quoting themselves and hiding behind an anonymous source.

Journalists and reporters for the major networks will strongly denounce the suggestion that they favor of one side or the other when it comes to being politically biased. On the other hand there are other media sources that come

The articles by CNN, “Wilbur Ross: We'll do tariffs 'without blowing up the world'” and by The Intercept, “Before Pushing Tariffs, Wilbur Ross Had a Messy History With the U.S. Steel Industry” Have similar viewpoints on the topics of their articles. Accordingly, they are opposed to President Trump’s plan on tariffs. While they have a similar viewpoint they are still divergent from each other. In brief The Intercepts article is more of a personal attack on Wilbur Ross while CNN’s article is more of an attack on President Trump’s Administration and they chose to write like this in order to show why we shouldn't have these tariffs.

There are many different hidden truths in the media that people do not know about due to the fact that the media emphasizes on just one particular point of view. Throughout the years, people have been biased in the media and the reason as to why this happens is that people choose to lean on one side such as republican, democrat, libertarian, or conservative. To be biased means to only be on one side of an argument or situation and only favor more of what one person has to say. There are a variety of different news channels in which they all tend to lean more on one side, there is not a single news channel that is on the same side as another. There are many current events that have multiple contentious between other news channels. The viewers