Article Review On Donald Trump

Since announcing his candidacy for president, Trump has created an even bigger name for himself dominating the news. And since Trump had decided to skip the last Republican debate aired on Fox News a few weeks ago, Trump had sent a message to Fox News showing his dominance over any event. Fox News may be able to afford giving digs at Trump, but because it is a Republican based network Fox News could not afford and would see much rating loss if they made a decision to drop Trump. What Is A Trump Republican? Donald’s personal attack strategy a new frontier for GOP candidates, the headline of a story Fox News released describing about a Trump Republican an outsider. The article is not bashing Trump the entire time, but the interviews included talk about why Trump is not ready to be president. During a TV interview in February, Trump mentioned the Pope’s unbelief with the danger the United States has with Mexico. Instantly, the news broke. CNN released a story headlined Really, Donald Trump? A Fight With The Pope? Fox News released a story shortly after headlining Trump: Pope will wish I was president when ISIS hits Vatican. Both news networks focus the story on the interview with Trump, but both in different ways are attacking Trump, portraying him an evil man. CNN does this by correlating Trump bad

Even only listening to Fox, Herman Cane, Rush Limbaugh, and Sean Hannity I would be getting plenty of political coverage of liberals. Fox News has many liberal commentators who are on the “conservative” network and regularly state the left-wing point of view. Rush and Sean, for instance, inform their listeners of liberal views perfectly plain if one is listening. Fox News itself has hosted many liberals Tamara Holder, ( a

In other words, the website reports newsworthy and marginally newsworthy stories, but if the reader is a discerning individual who likes to make up his/her own mind, it would be wise to consult other sources to validate the stories first. Using misleading, emotionally charged, headlines that fall short of alignment to the content of an article is also common (Remember the guidelines for writers: “We write the headlines for you). Readers of the Conservative Tribune need to understand they are not going to read anything on the Conservative Tribune website that may be damaging to the conservative cause. Articles are “ultra-conservative”

The United States should make stronger gun control laws because it is possible that guns can get into the wrong hands. Imagine an unstable person carrying around a gun, anyone is at risk. “In 2007, Seung-Hui Cho, a student at Virginia Tech, used two guns to kill 32 people and wound several others in two attacks two hours apart on the college campus in Blacksburg. Cho, who had a documented history of mental and emotional health problems, had nonetheless been able to purchase guns because the state of Virginia had failed to share his history with NICS.” (“Gun Control”, 2016, pg. 5) Thirty-two families will suffer from losing their loved ones because there was not an extensive background check. There are mentally ill people who are not seeking treatment that legally buy guns

The violence in the United States is a big issue, but making more gun laws is not the answer. It is an inevitable fact that making it harder to get access to guns would only lead people to turn to black markets and more underhanded deals. In an article for the Los Angeles Times, James Q. Wilson writes, “It is virtually impossible to use new background check or waiting-period laws to prevent dangerous people from getting guns. Those that they cannot buy, they will steal or borrow” (Wilson). Dramatic changes within gun controls laws would, in itself, make more people mad and possibly lead to riots. In many people's minds, more gun control laws would mean to taking guns away. Gun control laws within themself are not a bad thing, the extent to which they are taken within a nation

Gun control should not exist at all in the United States. Mass shootings have almost become seen as normal event in the United States. What people do not understand is that gun control is not the answer; there are countries with little to no control that have fewer shootings. According to The Washington Post,Finland is ranked number 4 in countries with the most guns despite that they only had 24 homicides by firearm (“Gun homicides and ownership by countries” n.pag.) . In the article Did Gun Control Work In Australia “it is shown that gun control has reduced the problems but it still has not completely got rid of all firearm deaths”(Matthews n.pag.). The number of murders, homicides, or suicides do not go up due to people just owning more guns. Clayton Perry, a staff writer at the University of Maine, even points out “Stricter gun laws were in place during the Assault Weapons Ban between 1994 and 2004, but that didn't stop the shooters at Columbine in 1999 ”(Perry n. pag.). In Iceland, thirty out of a hundred people own a gun and they have zero homicides caused by guns a year(“Gun Homicides and ownership by country” n. pag.). In this day and age, everything is unpredictable, guns are a form of protection for everyone and there should not be restrictions on protection. The U.S. Department of Justice released a data brief that states, “ On average in 1987-92 about 83,000 crime victims per year used a firearm to defend themselves or their property”(Rand BJS Statistician n. pag.). The National Sheriffs Association released that the average police response time is at eighteen minutes while the average school shooting only last twelve minutes (“Embracing Technology To Decrease Response Time” n. pag.). Gun control should not exist because other countries do fine without it , high gun ownership has no link with increasing death rates , and guns are not harmful when instructions are followed.

Even individuals who support gun rights acknowledge that some kind of people should not be allowed to have weapons because of their records. Proponents who favor gun control laws don’t believe that state and federal gun control acts do enough, they think that we need more restrictions and control, and gun rights advocates believe that the laws go too far, they think that giving the right to the government to control the purchase of weapons and allow background checks will give them the opportunity to look into our private life, and nobody wants, nor likes to be observed. Existent gun control laws prevent criminals, mentally ill people, and kids from buying guns. Unfortunately, there have been cases where teenagers and criminals have acquired weapons and used them to commit mass murders, and some other situations where kids accidentally kill themselves while playing with their parent’s gun. Weapon technology, gun ownership and even gun control laws can have unexpected consequences. Until now, there is not a perfect gun control solution, there is no way to know if gun control will make the nation safer or more dangerous until we try. If the American government cannot adopt stronger gun control laws, maybe Americans can adopt safer ways to use their guns. Citizens, lawmakers and gun

Just imagine sitting in class one day and hearing a loud bang and the next moment there is a confusing, abrupt, commotion. Imagine walking into a movie theater and not walking out. It is hard to imagine things like this happening because we have never experienced these moments ourselves, but to victims of gun violence, these moments are familiar and very real. Gun violence is becoming too common in this country. So common, that when there is a shooting, people are unaffected by such news. There has been desire from the people of America to change gun policy, but there are also people that argue against this because it goes against our Second Amendment rights. Although there are reasonable arguments on behalf of and against more regulations on guns, more regulations and background checks would reduce crime and death due to guns.

Reforming gun laws will prevent these dangerous weapons from falling into the wrong hands. Would a person rather be surrounded by criminals who have weapons around them? I believe guns are the perfect tools for chaos to occur. For many victims of domestic violence, there are risks of women being murdered by a partner who owns a firearm. (Newswire) Statistics shows that more than 1,000 gun possession charges – ranging from

We have +400% more shootings than the next country over the last 50 years and it seems to have no decline in sight. There is a saying that says, “If it’s not broken don't fix it.” However, our system is currently extremely flawed. A shooting happens, we mourn the dead for a week, or even a day, the gun debate comes up, and we move on with our lives. The common trend is to take the guns away from people, and to make it harder to own a firearm. When it comes down to it, the laws do not matter to these shooters. You want to make it harder to purchase a firearm with more background checks and more hoops to jump through? Who says they buy the guns legally? You put up a sign that says gun free zone? Well if there is a sign saying so then of course they won't bring one in do do harm right? There are three types of people in this world. The wolves, the sheep, and the sheepdogs. The wolves will alway look for blood, to prey on the others with their teeth and tenacity. The solution is to not have less sheepdogs in hopes the wolves will feel bad for the unprotected sheep, but instead will continue to prey on the weak. More sheepdogs equals less likely of a wolf attack, and that is a visualization that we can all live

Also, I watched an hour and a half of MSNBC on April 13 for this paper. Only 10 minutes were not dedicated to covering— or ridiculing— the Trump Administration. I found most coverage to be partisan, but written and styled for a left-wing audience, unlike Fox

Mass shootings have recently become more frequent and more deadly over the years. Living in the U.S. we have lived through at least fifty years of mass shootings and a variation of tragedies. A mass shooting is when a gunman shoots or kills four or more people in the same general time and location. The three most deadly shootings that have occurred in the U.S. in the past ten years are “ Las Vegas attack (at least 58 killed), Virgina Tech massacre (32 killed), Orlando nightclub shooting(49 dead)”(Willingham). These shootings exemplify the lack of control that we have over guns and the type of people that have possession of the guns. If we want to try to control the type of people who can own a gun, then the government should keep updated on the people who buy bigger guns with more rounds and do mental background checks. “The researchers also found that most mass murderers suffered from some mental instability, though they usually weren’t flagged by mental health specialists or law enforcement. And military-style rifles were used in 18 of the 66 mass public shootings in the most recent 15-year period the researchers studied”(Shastry, Anjali). If a person has possession a military-style rifle that should automatically redflag the government. Some of the main reasons that these things happen are because the government or law enforcement don't keep tabs on these people.

Walking into a classroom and finding 26 students dead. This is what happened because of background checks. Although there are many advocate for gun control, in our society today, guns end up in the wrong hands. With the invention of guns came the opportunity to protect one 's self. Also, with the invention and refinement of guns came the death and destruction of people across all major wars. Many says guns can be help full for self defense. But they do more harm then benefit. Many Teenagers, children, and mentally ill people have access to gun. They have seen in recent events. Gun control laws such as pre purchase background check, mental health checks, magazine limitations should be put in place in order to prevent mass shooting and other violent gun crimes. To prevent from having more shootings these procedures must have effect as soon as possible. NO matter what. It’s a great responsibility to own a gun. “With great power come great responsibility”. This is a great quote from the movie spider man because it applies to everything in life either its good or bad. Guns should only be given to humans that know how to control their emotions. People with disability’s or mixed emotions should have certain types of restrictions. This has now been brought to a domestic level, and with domestic violence and gun use increasing, the issue of gun control begs the question “should gun be

This graph shows that the Washington Post also had a diverse coverage of policy topics; however, not as diverse as the Los Angeles Times. In the 56 stories analyzed, 14 different policy topics were covered. Not surprisingly, government operations were covered most with 25% of the news coverage. Law, crime, and family issues, health, and international affairs and foreign aid followed this.

I don’t get much of an opportunity to watch the national news on the television (and never on cable); but when I do, it’s fairly easy to pick out which political slant each network is depicting. It appears to me, and this is my opinion, that ABC, NBC and CNN lean pretty far left, CBS is more the middle of the road, and FOX and its affiliates lean (fall over) to the right. I would guess that, based upon my readings of other people’s opinions of those broadcasters, that that is the general consensus of the public.