Article Review of Hansen's 'Human Error: A Concept Analysis'

Instead we can focus on the reason why the person makes the error, and how to reduce the risk of that error to be happening again. Not only that, knowing that making error is humanist can create an environment where individuals are confident that they can report errors or close calls (“near-misses”) without fear of retribution CITATION. For example, if the hospital which the nurse who did a med error is having a culture of safety, the nurse would have no reason to fear of fault, shame, and discipline about the error. She instead should be comfortable to report the error right away to be taken care of, and let the hospital team analyzes the error and find out how to mitigate or prevent future

Method: The type of article would be an empirical study. The purpose of the study was to examine

Dunbar, G. (2005). Evaluating Research Methods in Psychology. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons Inc.

What was the background for the research study? That is, what previous knowledge did the author describe as a foundation for the study in the “review of related literature”?

The rationale behind selection a literature review as study methodology, because the literature review method help to demonstrate and describe current knowledge

In research, there is no right or wrong process; although there are many heuristics that can be passed on. Appropriate use of information requires that we see knowledge acquirement as fluid and varying. (Jones, 1996)

Research is a primary component of sociology. Valid and relevant sociological research is dependent upon a commitment to applying the scientific method in a systematic and organized way in order to ensure maximum objectivity and consistency in research. Complete the following matrix based on a social problem of your choice. The matrix will serve as a guide for creating a preliminary plan for the basic steps of the scientific method.

the likelihood of errors while avoiding the trap of focusing on mistakes by individuals” (AHRQ,

o Conceptual model or theoretical framework: In what way was a conceptual model or theoretical framework used to guide this study?

Credibility Statement: Recently I have researched this topic with the aid of various academic journals, magazines, books, and newspapers.

Throughout this course I have learned many things about research at an introductory level. Research is a critical part of all of our lives in many ways. God blesses each of us with a degree of common sense and we all learn from observing others even as babies, we learned behaviors and skills by observing our parents. Walking through experiences throughout life teach us a lot we need to know as well but sometimes we have to take a better approach when we need to learn about certain things. Many of us know that what works in some situations or with certain individuals doesn’t always work or is the safest option for another situation. Controlled and precisely organized study allows scientists to compare and examine contrasting methods and concepts, also helps them to discover various approaches and be able to learn from individual’s behaviors and experiences. I will act as the case study throughout this paper in order to observe what I have learned about.

The section on different scientific approaches was useful in that it provided a framework for how the reader can apply research principles empirically. However, many of the components that are listed as being necessary for scientific research were redundant and cumbersome to process. For example, reliability and standardization appear to be very similar terms, and it would have been helpful for the authors to more thoroughly describe the distinction between the two components.

123). There are numerous approaches of creating meaning for concepts based on literature review, academic critique, and providing precise operational definition of said concepts (McEwin & Willis, 2011). Walker and Avant developed the concept analysis approach selected in this article in 1983, which is a concept analysis method based upon Wilson’s method from the 1960’s (McEwin & Willis, 2011). Walker and Avant’s method “provides a systematic approach to analyze relatively new concepts” (Bruggemann et al., 2012, p. 124), and is comprised of three different processes: concept analysis, concept synthesis, and concept derivation (McEwin & Willis, 2011, p. 54). The concept analysis process is broken down into eight different steps that will allow defined terms to be presented in a common language (McEwin & Willis, 2011, pg. 54, para. 2). Additionally, the concept synthesis process is utilized when concepts need to be developed further and can be broken down into three subcategories: qualitative synthesis, quantitative synthesis, and literary synthesis (McEwin & Willis, 2011, pg. 54, para. 3). Furthermore, the concept derivation process is useful when generating innovative ways of thinking about an occurrence when few concepts are available and is comprised of a four-step design (McEwin & Willis, 2011, pg. 55, para. 1).

According to Baridam (2001), it is not enough to review literature without presenting the studies by topic and determining how each of these topics relates to the researcher’s own study. A systematic presentation of the literature forms the foundation of the study.

Human error is a primary factor that makes organisational accidents unavoidable. Human error is defined as a human decision or action in which