Articles Of Confederation Vs Constitution Essay

There were many differences between the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution. At the end of the American Revolution the free states needed some sort of control that would generate to a unified country. Issues arose such as: How should power be divided between local and national governments? How should laws be made, and by whom? Who should be authorized to govern those laws? How could the government be designed to protect the unalienable individual rights? Their first attempt at solving this issue was the Articles of Confederation, which was a failure for the most part, but not completely. After the failure of the articles, the state delegates tried to revise the articles, but

The United States left the Articles of Confederation behind for a new more adapted constitution in 1788 due to more than one reason, however a main reason for the switch had to do with the power of the federal government. There would be some Libertarians that would hold the Articles to be the symbol of American freedom at its peak, however there were those that would later be known as Federalists that saw the Articles as a failure due to the lack of strong central government powers within the articles. The many differences between the two documents were each important in there own respect, the first one that come to mind would be the power to levy taxes, under the articles Congress could request that States pay taxes, but under the

The Constitution and the Articles of Confederation are the same in ways, but they are also, both different. Both of them founded our Government systems, but only one system still remains today. Both systems have their flaws, but also have their advantages. Without the Articles, there would be no Constitution, and the United States would be under the control of a tyrant. The Articles lead us to war, and separated us from Great Britain and now are our own country.

The United States Constitution replaced the Articles of Confederation because the document lacks the complete effectiveness to govern a body of people. The initial Constitution (articles of confederation) asked a lot from its colonies that wasn’t reciprocated. The articles were all over the place in-structure, causing many discrepancies. Within less than a decade its weakness in the ability to govern a body of people and required complete restructure, if the people were to move forward. At a time when the new states were operating on their own no longer under British rule.

Compared to the Constitution, the Articles of Confederation had a weak national government. The Articles of Confederation couldn’t force taxes or had any control over interstate commerce. The Articles of Confederation also didn’t have any standing armies. In comparison, the Constitution had the supreme law of the land. Congress could collect taxes, regulate commerce, and conduct diplomacy. And there was no more cornage. With the Constitution came Federalism. There was separation of power between three branches. The three branches are the Judicial, Executive, and Legislative Branch. There was also a shared power between states. With the Constitution, we also acquired a president. The president would be the executor of the laws and manages

There were many differences in regards to economy under the Articles of the Confederation and the Constitution. In the Articles of the Confederation, the main source of revenue came from contributions from individual states, alternately in the Constitution, Congress had the power to raise money without relying on individual states. In the Articles of Confederation, money could be coined but Congress did not have the power to levy taxes or regulate commerce. In contrast under the Constitution, paper money could not be issues however, taxes could be levied. Under the Confederation there was no president or judiciary system, under the Constitution there were both.

The simple difference between the Articles of Confederation and US Constitution is that the articles were not strong enough to hold our young nation together. The articles operated the US as separate states. Under the articles, it was very difficult to pass laws since the requirement of 9 out of the 13 states ' approval was needed for ratification. The Articles created a loose confederation of sovereign states and a weak central government, leaving most of the power with the state governments. The need for a stronger Federal government soon became apparent and eventually led to the Constitutional Convention in 1787. The members of the Constitutional Convention signed the United States Constitution on September 17, 1787 in

There have been two different documents that the United States has operated under. The first document was created on November 15th, 1777 and ratified March 1st, 1971 and is called The Articles of the Confederation (Klos, 2013). The second document was created on September 17th, 1987 and ratified on June 21st, 1788 and is called The Constitution (History.com staff, 2009). There are many important differences between these two documents. There were also differences in the country at the time each was written which made each document more appropriate for its time in history.

The Articles of Confederation and the U.S Constitution have a lot in common. They were both established by the same people, both were the official government of the united states, both were the laws of the United States Government, both called the nation the United States of America, both where federal United States documents, both could establish an army and declare war on other countries, both had a legislative branch, both could establish coins and set up a federal post office.

The two constitution employed different approaches when it comes to taxes, trade and commerce Bernstein & Rice (1987). The Articles of Confederation did not allow the national government to collect taxes from the people meaning that the national government would borrow or acquire the funds from the state (Cain & Dougherty, 1999). The Constitution changed the approach allowing both the state governments and the federal government to collect and levy taxes (Kingdon & Thurber, 1984). In addition, the Articles did not allow the national government to interfere with the commerce and trade, the Constitution took a different approach. The Constitution allowed the national government the duty to regulate trade and commerce in the inter-state level and the international level (Dougherty, 2006; Lutz, 1988).

There were many differences between the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution. At the end of the American Revolution the free states needed some sort of control that would generate to a unified country. Issues arose such as: How should power be divided between local and national governments? How should laws be made, and by whom? Who should be authorized to govern those laws? How could the government be designed to protect the unalienable individual rights? Their first attempt at solving this issue was the Articles of Confederation, which was a failure for

“The Constitution devotes the national domain to union, to justice, to defense, to welfare and to liberty” (Maier 154). This quote, stated by William Henry Seward, displays the strength and stability that the Constitution had over the nation, and the liberty and justice it supplied for all of its citizens. Although the Constitution and the Articles of Confederation have similarities, they have many differences, which proved that the Articles of Confederation were a weaker document in comparison. It can be said that the Articles were the “rough draft” to the final living document, which significantly influenced and “ruled” our government, as it still does today.

The difference between the Constitution and the Articles of Confederation was that the Constitution had a stronger foundation than that of the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation were made to have just a weak central government and giving the government of states more power. Peace began to prove the rationale of wartime, which began to show how the Articles were weaker than everyone had thought. There began to be dividing of states and rebellions in the states and the rebellions started to threaten the fruits of Revolution. As time went on, George Washington, James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Wilson began the work on making on nation, under one main government.

There are many differences in the Articles of Confederation that was written in 1777 and the Constitution, which was later written in 1787. The Articles of Confederation can be considered the United States’ first constitution and was written “during a time when the American people feared a strong national government.” (Knoedl). The Constitution was written because in the Articles of Confederation, the states were more interested in themselves and not as a government as a whole. The Constitution provided the framework for us to form a more perfect government together. There are many similarities and differences that can be found between the two documents.

The difference between the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution was that The Articles of Confederation issued a powerless central government and The Constitution developed a powerful central government. The Articles of Confederation did not create an executive branch. Congress was a unicameral legislature. Under the Articles of Confederation there was no federal court. Congress was not able to implement the laws and collect taxes without the approval of all of the states, under the Articles of Confederation. The uppermost weakness under the Articles of Confederation was its shortcoming of power to adapt trade among the states and with foreign nations (Mount, 2005). The similarities between the two included: Both could transfer and redeem ambassadors. The governments were astonished to compose treaties with