Artifact Argumentative Essay

Cultural artifacts should not be returned to the region of Origin. Evidence is shown in the passage, “Returning Antiquities to Their Countries of Origin” paragraph 1, “Museums acquire works to display from many different

Museums are filled with unique,historical artifacts that are precious to our history throughout the world. These “traveling exhibits” give people around the world an opportunity to see how our ancestors lived in many different regions of the world. Many artifacts are far away from their country of origin 7.In the articles “Bring Them Home”and “Museums Preserve the Cultures of the World,” people argue that museums should return certain artifacts to its original country, while others believes it’s only right to keep them considering the originating country rightfully sold those artifacts.In my opinion, countries should bring some artifacts back to their originating country.

It is clear Ryerson University needs a better way to make education accessible to all their students. With the constant delays of the transit systems we have, and the rising costs to commute, students are skipping lectures. The best solution to this problem is starting VR enabled lectures. This will keep expenses low for students and save time that students struggle to find. VR enabled lectures are far superior to the alternative, which is living on campus. By living on campus expenses increase and you’re not in the comfort of your home. Also it is not guaranteed you will get approved to live on residence because of the limited beds available. Being a computer science students we already have the necessary knowledge to make this possible, as

I hope to see museums make more concerted efforts to educate the public. Too many exhibits are of the “passive, didactic looking” than like the engaging Object Stories program (Dartt, Murawski). Exhibits should seek to tell untold narratives, and programs should be places of communication and cross-cultural encounters. For too long, difficult confrontations have been avoided, both inside the museum, and by dominant communities

The passing of the AHCA bill will dismantle Obamacare and all of its subdivisions. As a result, the subdivision in which employers, with 50 employees or more, are required to offer affordable health insurance options to both part-time and full-time employees will be eradicated. Therefore, the burden of acquiring affordable health insurance will be lifted off the employer and instead be placed on the employee; leaving many without insurance coverage. In an effort to obtain health insurance part-time employees may be completed to leave their current positions in pursuit of a full-time position with benefits. Consequently, as the repealing of Obamacare is not occurring in a vacuum it will not only have an impact on the health care industry but

Hunting is considered one of America’s most famous and traditional past times. Fathers around the nation, with high hopes of teaching their children the ropes, are constantly threatened by the chances of hunting being exterminated. For the average person, this problem isn’t established by the threatening blows made on our constitutional amendments; instead, the main threat for your average hunter revolves around finding areas to carry out this tradition. Unfortunately, this problem could very-well be the terminal endpoint of fathers observing their children harvest their first big game animal. As an advocate for hunting and any sport revolving around the great outdoors, I constantly sweat over the thought of one day finding myself unable to pursue a passion that I love, strictly because finding areas to hunt on is nearly impossible because of other people’s actions.

In school there are a lot of students who enjoy painting, or taking photos, or playing music or anything that is arts related. Students who take these fine arts programs love these classes and enjoy being in them, taking them away could falter a student’s school life. Fine arts is a big deal at Central, we have so many talented students at our school, they deserve all the consideration and appreciation that they get. Funding for the fine arts programs should not be considered to be cut because the fine arts can benefit a student’s test performance, they benefit a student’s culture, and can help a student’s future. First off, the fine arts program can actually help students, it helps them benefit their school life and it can actually help test scores, in an article with “The Washington Post” from Tyleah Hawkins, the author, states how the fine

I think yes artifacts should be returned to their place of origin if the country can make sure that the artifacts are protected. Why i believe that the artifacts should be returned to their place orgen is because it will shown more background of the artifact to show where it was used but because once it was removed from its origin it lost some context and meaning for what it did.Also by returning some artifacts back to tribes or the groups of people that made to artifacts for special ceremonies, as they are said in paragraph 4 “Some museums have objects that were made for private Native American religious ceremonies and were never meant to be seen by the public.”

However, artifacts should not be repatriated to the countries of their origin because museums are to educate people about different places, things, objects, cultures, and eras. If the artifact is donated then the museum’s highest priority is to honor the donor’s wishes. And if the museum found the artifact(s) in a foreign country, then it should stay with museum

To begin, one reason why the museums shouldn’t return the artifacts is because whoever found the artifact has the artifact in their history not the person who owns the land. “Such as when Ponce de León’s ships landed on Florida's east coast near present-day St. Augustine. He claimed this beautiful land for Spain, so Spain has now has Florida in their history” Further, another reason why the museums shouldn’t return the artifacts is because if the countries that want them back want them so bad then why don’t they just pay the countries

Everyone works 8 hours and 25 minutes to make the quota of 24 000 hours a day and so that everyone feels they are an equal to those they live and work with. But no one has is disappointed by their work. Everyone likes their job because they can pick from the many jobs we have. Fishing, hunting, gathering, gardening, cooking, cleaning, building, sewing, healing, and governing are all jobs of Decoris.

A 101 year old woman called Anatolia Vertadella, gave birth to a 9-pound baby after a controversial ovary transplant. Because of her age, this translplant was widely criticized by medical professionals.The procedure drew a lot of heat from medical experts due to Anatolia’s age – it was illegal, but still done in a private clinic in Turkey where the European laws on ovary transplants do not apply.

Is it ethically right for museums to be able to take cultural artifacts from their country of origin? Antiquites should be to their country of origin because in cultures such as Native American tribes described in “Passage 1: Returning Antiquities to Their Countries of Origin in paragraph 4 written by Joyce Mortimer” some of their artifacts are now on display in museums for anyone to see, even though these objects were to be kept private and for religious ceremonies, not for the public eye to see. By museums taking away these objects from such tribes, they now lose a crucial part of their culture which really depicts their qualities and beliefs.

There it is, the Titanic, scattered along the ocean floor. It lays peaceful and undisturbed. Looking away for only a moment, people are going to awake the grave site. This is not necessarily a good thing. Further, out in the distance, you can see the people that once belonged. They are crying out to their loved ones, longing to regain their tranquility once again. The artifacts down in the Titanic are very symbolic, which must stay. To some, it is to remember the ones that have been lost, and even what can happen from a tragedy. The true problem is should we bring these relics to museums, or should be we leave them be. Good may come from this, but maybe it cannot. These precious artifacts must remain where they are meant to be, even if that means they are thousands of miles apart from us.

Times. http://www.nytimes.com.2008/02/19/world /americas/19iht-princeton.1.10175351.html Fitzsimmons, W. 2014. Time out or Burn out for the Next Generation. Retrieved from