In my opinion, artists are simply creators. Artists create things that are reflections of their psyche, society at-large, or anything that comes to mind. Given that the inspiration for an artist’s work can be so varied and diverse, I think it’s hard to say that artists have a social responsibility given that some artists’ work don’t necessarily convey or reflect the feelings or ideals of the greater bulk of society. Artistic expression is important and as soon as society begins to police or restrict the ability of an artist to express his or herself, I think we’re moving into dangerous territory as a culture. With that said, I don’t think artists should be held accountable for the work they produce. Artists should be allowed to completely and
In a short section of chapter 18 “Non-Western Perspectives” of Understanding Art, Lois Fichner-Rathus explains the architectural detail in the pyramid temple of Quetzalcoatl, Teotihuacan. By adding that the high-relief heads surrounding the structure are images of the God Quetzalcoatl—who was believed to be a feathered serpent (425). Additionally, points out the bas-reliefs details of abstract serpent scales and feathers that follow the paths of the panels (425). And lastly, briefly mentions that the Aztec population believed in the God Quetzalcoatl.
Art and painting considers the one of the most effective ways of addressing and communicating the ideas and information about the past. The history is full with many artists and painters who emerged the history of the events and lives of the past people in their paintings and so geared the great attraction of the people in all over the world. Comparatively it is the most meaningful way to deliver the information to the other people and so increase the learning of the students. The visual art considers the most attractive way for many years as the visual things or advertisements leaves the best impression and influence on the viewers.
Both of the articles were written about the topic of cultural competence and sensitivity as an art educator in art classrooms, but each author had a certain approach in their writing that caused their articles to affect my interpretation in very different ways. For instance, the article written by Lucy Andrus was very detailed and straightforward; however, it was so objectively written that the ideas were difficult for me to conceptualize. I understood why Andrus expected teachers to instruct their classes in such a way, but I did not understand how such a reform would be brought about. Andrus’ expectations for the model art class just seemed overwhelmingly unrealistic for me to even imagine the kind of classroom that she was describing. For example, the complete integration of cultural education throughout the entire school experience is a concept that to me seemed to be a long process that was far too idealistic and impractical to attempt, especially in schools with more conservative curriculums. It was not that I disagreed with cultural integration and its benefits, but that complete cultural integration into a child’s education did not seem feasible to me. On the other hand, the article written by Jeffrey L. Broome came from learning how to create a culturally sensitive art class through personal experiences, which made the concept of culturally responsive art classrooms much more realistic for me to imagine and also helped me to fully understand the importance of what
IVP Books, publisher of Andy Crouch’s Culture Making: Recovering our Creative Calling, calls the literature a “rallying cry for a new generation of culturally creative Christians.” Named one of the best religion books of 2008 by Publisher’s Weekly, Crouch begins his preface stating that he “wrote Culture Making on a hunch that the language of “engaging the culture,” let alone the “culture wars,” fell far short of what we were really meant to do and be as Christians in the world. I also sensed that most churches were neglecting the centrality of culture to the biblical story and the gospel itself,” (p. 5). While the book is intended for a Christian audience, Crouch
Some artists also have the rights of attribution and integrity, meaning they can claim authorship and prevent the use of their name for works that are not theirs. There are different time constraints for a work to be copyright-protected in the United States according to the Artists Rights Society. They also explained that any changes in copyright terms have occurred over the years, but now there is a total of 95 years of copyright protection of works published before January 1, 1978, and a term of the lifetime of the artist plus 70 years for works published after January 1, 1978. The term of copyright protection is different from country to country and depends on what the individual nations decide to do. On the “Copyright Basics” page of Artists Rights Society, they state that in 1994, the European Union, as a whole, established a term of the lifetime of the artist plus 70 years. Understanding the background information about copyright in the United States is helpful when discussing the specific issues right for artists.
Theater is the activity or profession of acting in, producing, directing, or writing plays. It is that of escaping the real world and going into a new one. Not only does one go more in depth into their mind, but they also go into the mind of others.Theater helped me find out who I really am. Growing up, I always enjoyed the idea of stepping into someone else’s shoes, but I never got the chance until I was in the sixth grade.
Everyone strives to do better and succeed, why would people want to do worse? The key to succeeding may be different across unique people, but a trait known as grit was introduced by a psychologist named Angela Duckworth in a TedTalk, “…One characteristic emerged as a significant predictor of success. It wasn 't social intelligence, it wasn 't good looks, physical health, and it wasn 't IQ: It was grit.” Grit, in my words, is the capability of failing or persevering through difficulties and still being able to succeed in the end. Whether you are or not familiar with grit, it has the potential to change lives, and examples of this trait are shown in my personal life, the arts, and world events.
Is art a form of self-expression from the artist to their audience? Self-expression is defined as, “the expression of one's feelings, thoughts, or ideas, especially in writing, art, music, or dance.” (English Oxford Dictionary). The source of inspiration for art is unknown for certain, but it is commonly believed that it comes from inside the artist, based on their life lessons and experiences. If the inspiration comes from within, then artists are expressing themselves through their art, thus art is self-expression. There are innumerous forms of art, from writing to dancing; singing to creating a drawing, public speaking and everything in-between. A person who is whistling is expressing how they are feeling through the notes that they hit. Someone who is drawing can use darker colors, such as browns and blacks to give off an eerie tone. Does that mean that all art is self-expression? No, not all art is self-expression, maybe it isn’t self-expression at all. This leads to the debate over whether art is self-expression if the inspiration comes from an outside source, rather than from within.
Some may say music is just music; a song is just a song. However, music plays an enormous role in our psychology, because a single song has the ability to bring about many kinds of thoughts and emotions in the listener. Music is subtly one of the main factors in which people identify with certain groups and establish their belonging in society. It shapes people’s perspectives on how the world functions and the roles they play within it. Music can function the same way in a culture; it can reflect many of the culture’s values and ideologies. Music can have many effects on culture and the people’s idea of who they think they are within that culture. Music can serve in a way that promotes cultural identity and pride, yet it could also play a
When I was reading your response to this week’s discussion, I noticed you made some important points that I agreed with. We both agree on the belief that architecture is and should be considered art. You mentioned in your response, that there are buildings globally that hold a historic artful meaning or appearance. I could not agree with you more, our book is filled with pictures of historic architectures that have beautiful art sculptures, paintings, images, and much more on them. Architecture I believe is another form of self-expression and another art form. According to our book, “Exploring Art: A Global, Thematic Approach,” written by Margaret Lazzari and Dona Schlesier, states that, “The designs of individual homes embodied climate concerns, aesthetic preferences, and cultural choices” (Lazzari and Schlesier 128). This quote to me means, that the art is present in architecture. The structure of the home is being built according to the owner’s likings and cultural beliefs. Which in other words is an example of architecture being self-expressed.
The Renaissance, or “re-birth,” was a flourishing period of art that produced and developed different styles of art and other innovations. The art market grew tremendously due to the rise of materialism and a market for expensive goods. Art was not only viewed as an object for worship, but also as a highly valuable commodity. Artists were no longer just seen as artisans, but as talented artists, and the patrons were seen as wealthy, powerful people. The art market flourished because of the rise of relationships between aspiring artists and patrons, especially the Medici family. Patrons and artists with a rise in wealth combined to make the Renaissance one of the largest cultural and art movements in history.
art should not be funded by the government, for art should be funded by private financiers.
The brief for this assignment is as I see it to research more than 8 carving cultures and to explain the impact of social and cultural belief on art practice. To present research material in the correct form and record citations and bibliography correctly. This information is based on the question.
Social media is a nest crawling with interesting stories, crazy videos, and beautiful pictures. I was scrolling down my Facebook newsfeed one day and stumbled upon this work of art. It immediately caught my eye and clearly speaks volumes. I was sure to save the picture because I knew it would come in handy in the future. The painting makes a major statement that many individuals fail to recognize. Not only was racism a problem in the past, but it is still prominent today.
When an artist goes to paint a piece, or mold a sculpture there is no preset impression of how the artist interprets it to turn out. They let their creative energy generate the image as it evolves ascetically with the agency of creating art. The artist may not have a vivid account, or clear picture for the final result but the art emerges as the artist conducts his piece leaving the artist with pure, utter creative freedom.When hearing this metaphor its hard not to see the direct correlation to moral choice being relatable to the construction and formulation of art work. “I mention the work of art only by way of comparison.That being understood, does anyone reproach an artist, when he paints a picture, for not following rules established?