As technology advances, law’s and discretion seem to lag behind how to interpret the rules for

Without net neutrality, companies can charge the customer for how much data they use rather than a flat price. Most every other business practice is like this. If someone goes to get fast food and only wants a sandwich but has no other choice but to get the full meal, that is the same concept. This is very appealing to lots of people who may not use as much data as most internet users and feel that they are paying too much. Internet Service Providers are very against net neutrality because it costs them more money.

The internet is a resource with ever expanding content and applications for everyone to use however, net neutrality rules on the free use of internet remains a debated topic. The “Point/Counterpoint: Network Neutrality Nuances” presents Barbara van Schewick’s supportive argument on the applications of net neutrality rules, and the consequences of failing to do so. Schewick’s engaging justifications are well researched with arguments containing significant amounts of examples, strong and simplistic diction to reach her audience, and clean and smooth transitions to move between ideas.

Net neutrality is an internet service provider (ISP) which requires treating all data equally. It is important to have net neutrality because rules and regulations have to be upheld. If there was no net neutrality, providers could do whatever they want because there would be no one consequences. Therefore, neutrality laws give businesses the chance to stand as equals. It affects companies and customers. In particular, when the customer pays for services such as T-Mobile, Bright House, and TECO they want fast and uninterrupted services as well as customer service ready to discuss concerns. Customers do not want to pay for services that do not deliver on its promise. Organizations have to make a profit to stay in business, and they need their

Since net neutrality forces Internet Service Providers to treat all content equally, people can have equal opportunity on the internet. Blocking, throttling, and slowing websites is restricted with net neutrality, so everybody gets to have equal competition on the internet. Without net neutrality Internet Service Providers would have the ability to throttle companies that support them, and block competitor companies and their services. This would start monopolies that restrict smaller companies from selling products and services. People also have suspicions that Internet Service Providers will start to make people pay microtransactions to have access to each individual site or group of sites on the internet. Because net neutrality evens the playing field for all users of the internet, net neutrality promotes

ISPs could manipulate speeds and throttle (Throttling is a process of slowing down content or speeding up others) to their liking and make deals with companies to make their services faster than others. Without net neutrality a packet of data from youtube for example could be treated different from a packet of data from netflix. this means that companies with priority access or a “fast lane” would stream faster. ISPs could also block services or websites not even making them available to the user. This would be something like cable is now were the more you pay the more you get. If an ISP did not like a service or website they could just block it. An open Internet is essential to the American economy, and increasingly to our very way of life. Net neutrality has been built into Internet since it was creation we can not take the principle for

The faster Internet speed one desires, the more costly it will be. Meaning that big or small companies have to pay the same flat rate for the same Internet speed. By having the same flat rate for all companies, it makes start-up firms easier to get into the market. If net neutrality were not in place, as written in the article, “Goodbye Net Neutrality…Now What?” by Michael Kassner, who attended the University of Wisconsin, stated, “Getting rid of net neutrality will allow ISPs [Internet service providers] like AT&T, Comcast, and Verizon to supply, for a price, preferential treatment to content providers.” Meaning that the ISPs will charge companies for their websites, services online, etc. to be faster. This could be a positive or negative thing for companies. If the company is a large one and can afford to pay for preferred treatment, not having net neutrality could be a good thing, as we can see from AT&T Sponsored Data service. As explained in the article by Michael Kassner the Sponsored Data service is,” Sponsoring companies agree to pay AT&T so its subscribers need not worry about monthly data limits — a digital version of the razor/razor blade theory. Content providers willing to do this are giving their users more or less a free data pass, so consumers will consider this a plus.” But there are downsides; AT&T or other ISPs can

Say you order something from Amazon which is a large company; they process all deliveries through an internet service provider, along with 3 other companies. Now net neutrality works by evenly distributing all the services at the same rate making it a fair yet competitive environment. If net neutrality was not in place then the bigger companies, which in this instance would be Amazon, could put more money into the system creating faster service to the consumers and knocking out the other competitors. Net neutrality shows that each business in not competing with one another, big or small, and has the same chance of growing and plunging forward and becoming successful. Net neutrality creates opportunities for people and is favored by many

Providing equal opportunity for people online and other ISP(Internet Service Provider) is important to maintain net neutrality. Giving people this equal opportunity on the internet provide a free- market environment (World Encyclopedia, The, 2001). If a business owner wanted to start a store on the internet, they would have access to the same resources, tactics, and skills to get the maximum revenue for their business. With net neutrality gone, the ISP could slow down certain websites and even block them. This will give them a disadvantage and would change the economic style of the internet with an authority figure having control of the information and businesses that have a choice to make them rich or poor. Net neutrality will give

Net Neutrality is a basic principle within the internet that basically keeps everything equal by not allowing governments or internet service providers (ISP) to charge us extra or treat sources, providers, content, or platforms differently. Net neutrality has been an issue in the United States that has been widely debated since the 1990’s (when the world wide web was created). Many large scale ISP’s within the United States claim to be for the idea of net neutrality however some people believe this not to be the case. Without net neutrality principles in place, ISP’s could control everything we do which could be used to block certain things making the ISPs able to charge us more for these services. The ability to make more money by charging

All data on the Internet is the same, where there is no discrimination or charging differences based on the user, website, device, equipment, content, application, etc. Basically, the Internet treats all content equally no matter how it is delivered or where it comes from. A good example is how you access Amazon’s website should be no different than a small local business website or downloading a video. The debatable issue is where ISPs would create a concept of “fast lane” access, where big companies would pay to ensure they remain competitive with faster transmission speeds. Within an ISP network, companies like Amazon and Walmart may compete to access a ISPs fast lane, ultimately leaving one to conduct business on the slow lane. ISPs view the Internet as a luxury because big companies have deeper pockets to stay in the “fast lane” which in turn will generate more revenue for ISPs. The loss of net neutrality means small business and certain websites may no longer

The issue of net neutrality is an extremely important issue because any one person who uses the internet can be affected by whether or not the net is neutral or not. Net neutrality is the internet’s guiding principle back from when it was created. Net neutrality is the concept that on the internet everything and everyone is equal. Broadband needs to be classified under the rules on Title II of the Communications Act, so that everyone can have a free platform. What this means is that Internet Service Providers (ISPs) cannot charge a website, such as a streaming site, more to have faster service. ISPs cannot also intentional slow a website's connection nor can they filter out entire websites because they want to. The reason this is very controversial

Your internet experience is in jeopardy and it’s up to you to prevent it. Net Neutrality is the principle that regulates internet service providers like Verizon, AT&T, and Comcast from charging consumers a higher price for faster connection to their content. Net neutrality allows access to the internet on to all consumers equally. When it comes to the internet and browsing, the speed at which your information loads is important. Viewing a video on Instagram, Facebook or YouTube, which takes 5 minutes to load can be frustrating to the viewer. However, more consumers would connect to a server where they may view a video that only takes 5 seconds to load.

Throughout the last decade, the idea of Net Neutrality has been the topic of many debates. Net Neutrality is the idea that Internet service providers should not be allowed to block their users from any content regardless of its source. The Debate is still continuing in 2017 with the F.C.C planning to repeal Net Neutrality and allow internet providers to completely regulate what their users can see and charge the users extra for “luxuries” such as social media, messaging, email, and music. There are two sides of this argument, one side believes that Net Neutrality should be taken away, while others believe that it is unfair for the Internet providers to have the right to take away the access to any content. Internet providers should not be allowed to control what content one can view when surfing the internet.

According to “Net Neutrality” from Stanford.edu, without Net Neutrality, the internet could become like cable TV in that “The Internet would be controlled by a few very large companies who would be free to decide how much service should cost and what content users have access to”4 Certain websites could be restricted or offered for extra, transforming the internet from a free, unrestricted place into a space controlled and operated by large companies. In addition, it is pointed out that once humans become accustomed to improvement, it becomes difficult to go back to something worse. If ISPs created “fast lanes” and “slow lanes,” customers would find the “slow lanes” unbearable after using the superior version.1 Author Nicholas Carr has done extensive research proving this phenomenon.1 This would disadvantage smaller websites that cannot afford to pay ISPs a fee to be

The emergence of the Internet and the World Wide Web brought upon a medium of communication with a range of opportunities for the world. However, this medium is, in due course, subject to the control of a few major companies. The enigma of information flow is the central concern of net neutrality. Consumers, competition and network owners would benefit directly from the regulation of network neutrality because it would provide a positive impact to those parties as well as provide equality.