Asch Line Experiment Paper

So Dr. Asch asked, did the people who gave in to the group do so knowing that their answers was wrong? Or did the social pressure actually change their perceptions?. To answer the question I believe it was social pressure that changed their perceptions, I believe that these participants were influenced by their fellow peers, which encouraged them to follow their peers and changed their thoughts and reality of the real answer. The articles goes on speaking about conformity and a new study that was being researched on perception. “The new study tried to find an answer by using functional M.R.I scanners that can peer into the working brain, a technology not available to Dr. Asch.” As stated in the article, the researcher found that social conformity showed up in the brain as activity in regions that are entirely devoted to perception. And our independent judgment was found in our emotional activity in the brain, this is significant because it makes sense that the conformity would associate itself with the area of the brain that deal with perception. Because as I said before conformity is rules and standards made by society, people can change and shape our perception in a very significant way. But it takes our emotions to stand up against that group and have our own independent judgment. Now In this new research, they used 32 volunteers and informed them that they’ll be in the M.R.I scanner. They were asking to rotate images of three-dimensional objects to

Studying collage students, or any other narrowed group, does not represent the majority of individuals that could be in the situation of a false confession. The consequences of a confession of a crime can lead to an investigation to close, leaving the "perpetrator" with higher charges. These real life consequences can also discredit any real evidence on a case, letting the real perpetrator off. With this, if an individual decides to retract their false confession, a jury is more likely to convict them because they are seen as untrustworthy (Kassin et al., 2010). These consequences are unlikely to be taken into consideration with experimental research on false

The participants seated themselves around a table, these confederates were not known to each other, and most important concept of this experiment relied on the fact all of the participants were working together, but for one. They took turns in a fixed order to call out publicly which of three comparison lines was the same length as a standard line on the left card. In reality only one person was a naive participant who answered second to last, the rest were experimental confederates instructed to give erroneous responses.

Asch’s experiment was performed in 1951 and is now a classic experiment in psychology. Asch asked individuals a simple question and a high percentage answered correctly. Then Asch placed a participant in a room with seven actors who had predetermined incorrect answers. When asked in front of the group, 75% of people would give incorrect answers clearly because of they conformed to the actors around them. Asch then concluded that it is natural for one to conform to society in order to fit

In Lord Of The Flies the boys are faced with a choice of who to follow such as in the “Asch Conformity Experiment” when they were faced with the challenge of being different and choosing what they thought was right. The Lord Of The Flies shows how when faced to make a choice the main factor that will sway the decision is surrounding peers. In the “Asch Conformity Experiment” the test subjects were asked to match a certain line length with one of three choices. Asch had told all but one subject what line to choose and when the one subject that had not been told what choice to choose most all the time picked the same line as the others. The times that the subject picked the right answer was when there was another subject that was told to pick the right choice this made the subject feel as he was not alone.

Thirty-seven of the 50 participants agreed with the incorrect group despite physical evidence to the contrary. Asch used deception in his experiment without getting informed consent from

Solomon Asch set up a laboratory experiment using deception and confederates to determine what factors were involved in conformity and individual decisions in group decisions. Asch instructed subjects to choose which of three lines was the same length as the original line shown. Each subject was on a panel with seven other subjects, however in reality were confederates. The experimenter demonstrated the two cards and asked the individuals to choose the line on the comparison card that is the same length as the standard line. In the second trial the process was repeated again. However, on the third trial, when the card is revealed everyone gave wrong answers. The results indicate that approximately 75% of the subjects went with the group’s

Solomon Asch, double-blind experiment on finding why people conform to a group was the line judging task, in this task, he had a pair of cards and drew one line on the first card and the three lines on the second card. For this experiment, he had a group of people correctly match the one line to one of the three lines, and asked a person (not aware of the experiment) for their answers, after the group has answered to see their response. Sometimes, the group was right, sometimes

The research question of the experiment was if there was an effect of a discredited eyewitness on jurors’ verdicts. During this study, we were replicating and testing the participants that were asked to assume the role of a juror as they read three scenarios and if there was effects of a discredited eyewitness on a juror’s verdicts. For suspicious individuals, they are discredited eyewitness jurors and may react as well as being less likely to convict. For naive people, it didn’t matter, the jurors were still convicting, as well as ignoring the fact that it is very powerful to say “I saw this”. The results of this experimental study were almost exact to what the class as well as myself

Solomon Asch 's (1951) conformity experiment is the study of people adapting their behaviours in order to follow the social normalities. This experiment entails a group of people who are actors and know about the experiment, and one person who is unknowing of the experiment, which are all in the same room. The group is shown a pair of cards; card A has a line on the card, and card B has three lines varying in length on the card, the similarities of the lines are obvious. The group individually, saying out loud picks one of the three lines on card B that matches the length of the line on card A. Everybody picks the correct line, this happens for a few rounds, then when shown another pair of cards the first actor chooses the wrong line on card B. The rest of the actors choose the same line the first actor chose, this tests to see if the unknowing participant will choose the same answer as the group (McLeod, 2008). The person who is unknowing of the

Materials: Participants were asked to distinguish truths from lies in a variety of different situations by attending to any cues that they believed were indicative of deceptive behavior. Specifically, the participants saw 50 video clips of 50 different individuals (23 women and 27 men). 15 of the clips included suspects accused of crimes, like rape, murder, arson, and theft. 11 of the clips consisted of married individuals. 14 clips showed undergraduate and graduate students. The remaining 10 clips consisted of business owners. The individuals in the clips were all different, thus no one individual showed up more than once. The individuals in the video clips were asked to answer questions and were given instruction ahead of time that they could either lie or tell the truth. Only clips where the researcher knew ahead of time were lies or truths were shown to participants. Individuals in the video clips were asked to answer a variety of different questions. Criminals were asked questions about their

Solomon Asch was a psychologist that conduced numerous expirments designed to illustrate the increasing conformity within social groups. The experiments also invesigated the effect the number of people present within the group had one the conformity rate. Asch hypothesized, “ that the majority of the people would not conform to something obviosly wrong; however, when surrounded by (other) individuals all voicing an incorrect answer, 75% of them(the participant) will conform to the groups answer” (Watzlawick 1976)

In conclusion, individuals will lie about anything rather than telling the truth. I believe people deal with this experiment everyday in their lives. I think being paid one-dollar is not enough to lie about something that is not true. Those students that were given a dollar were tricked. Whereas, being paid twenty dollars is better in this situation. However, trying to convince someone to lie about a situation is something I will never

They told some participants that “both they and their partners would benefit by receiving monetary compensation if the amount of money was overestimated. Other participants were told “that either they or their partners would benefit.” These scenarios were created to give participants a reason to lie. They were deceived to believe that by lying about the amount of money in a jar and over estimating the money, it would benefit them personally. Researchers observed that participants were more likely to lie when they could benefit from the estimation. According to study coauthor and lab director Tali Sharon, participants tended to lie more as the experiment increase. One little lie led to an even bigger

In 1951 Solomn Asch, a Polish psychologist, administered an experiment to consider the effect to which social pressures from a majority group would have on an individual to conform. Solomn had a staged group of nine people and a single real participant take a visual line comparison test, in which participants would choose which line out of three matched the comparison line best. After running twelve trials, Solomn found that around seventy-five percent of real participants would knowingly conform at least once to the majority group that would always pick the wrong line. Solomn was able to conclude that people conform for two main reasons: either to fit in, known as normative influence, or because they believe they are less informed than the