Asdsadsasasd

Daniel Elazar’s three categories of state political cultures are moralistic, individualistic, and traditionalistic (Smith & Greenblatt , 2016). Moralistic culture is defined in the textbook, a political culture that views politics and government as the means to achieve the collective good (Smith & Greenblatt , 2016). Individualist culture is described as a political culture that views politics and government as just another way to achieve individual goals (Smith & Greenblatt , 2016). Traditionalistic culture is explained as a political culture that views politics and government as the means of maintaining the existing social order (Smith & Greenblatt , 2016). I believe the states can have mixed features of all three of Elazar’s types of

The unitary government is often described as a centralized government. It is a government in which all powers held by the government belong to a single, central agency. The central government creates local units of government for its own convenience. Most of the government in the world are unitary, Great Britain being one of them. One single central organ is Parliament it holds all the power of the British government. Local governments do exist but solely to relieve Parliament of burdens it could perform

A "state" is a historically specific formation and cannot be confused with other political organizations belonging to different cultures and epochs. A "rational" state was only possible in the West, because such a formation is historically and geographically specific. Indeed, only after the achievement of the monopoly of violence does it make sense to speak of a "state." First, Anter seeks to justify Weber's attempt to explain the state in terms of individual agency. Such an account underestimates Weber's own "structural" concept of the state, according to which the state has an internal logic and autonomy. Weber's agent-orientated interpretation, in which the state comes in and remains in existence because certain actors base their actions on the assumption that the state exists or should exist, contradicts his notion of the state as an organization of domination based, in the last instance, on physical violence and following its own laws (Eigengesetzlichkeiten). (Norkus, 2004) Rather, as a social macro-structure the state must be analyzed through categories independent of agents. A similar problem occurs when Anter claims that, for Weber, a sociologist can see the state only as a conceptual construct. This seems to forget his other view, that the material bases of the state are violence and domination. Second, it is doubtful whether Weber really defined politics as so closely tied to the state. In Weber's political writings, the state and the nation are

The idea of political culture is found within the state’s history. The history of the state is impacted by the people settled in the region, religious backgrounds, and geography. The history of the state influences the attitudes and beliefs that people hold regarding their political system. Daniel Elazar theorized a connection between the states’ history and attitude towards government by explaining differences in government between states. Every state is different with some common ground. Elazar’s theory divides states into three types: moralistic, traditionalistic and individualistic. The state’s constitution defines the powers of government with political culture bias. Because of the state constitution, the political culture

Ones’ political and social agreement derives from society. Human nature leads to a state of nature, pre-government, which then the social contract rectifies, creating the purpose of government. Before understanding how the

have formal authority over the people and land. This system of government federalism simply is

8. Council of government- a cooperative agency consisting of representatives of local governments in a metropolitan area in the United

A confederal form of government that includes several independent sovereign governments (such as the first 13 state governments in the American case) agree to cooperate on specified policy matters while each sovereign state retains ultimate authority

Politics issues makes unusual associates' is an axiom that has managed the test of time. Whether its Republicans and Democrats making arrangements in Congress, or Joseph and Pharaoh administering Egypt in the Old Testament, the nature of legislative issues and the needs of the state can frequently require an odd blend of characters. Such was the situation in the eighteenth century, when a few rulers of Central and Western Europe embraced and actualized goals of the Enlightenment, a learned development which overall denied that governments were the premise of political force!

government on all sides of the Constitution that is bounded by law, giving the local and state

In the political approach, political authority is divided between a central government and the provincial or state governments. This means that some provinces or states are accorded a substantial measure of constitutional or legal sovereignty, although they still remain subordinates of the central government in certain constitutional or legal respects. The political approach promotes the political values of military strength, economic development, union, and representation. In addition, it is characterized by three central features: state sovereignty, bicameralism, and multiple layers of representation.

State is commonly referred to either the present condition of a system or entity, or to a governed entity, such as a nation or a province. The state itself consists of the society, government as well as the people living there. Before the Second World War, State is often seen as the main actor in international Relations as it can declare states of wars, control most of the economic influence within the region and larger states often dominant the role of international relations within the region or even in the globe. However, after the Second World War, the impacts on state influence as an actor has become less important than before, regarding to this point, there is

states pursue different objectives and comply with different principles and norms, which affect and exert influence on state behavior.

According to Farkins (2008) “Civil Government is the proper authority for governing and enforcing laws at the local, municipal, state, or national level.” civil government also known as

The term state incorporates a number of range of things, a assembly of institutions, a provincial unit, an instrument of oppression and coercion and the list goes on. There are different way of understanding State, The Idealistic approach is given by G.W.F. Hegel identifies the moments of social existence : THE FAMILY ,THE CIVIL SOCIETY AND THE STATE. He argued that in State there exist a universal altruism and it as an ethical community underpinned by mutual sympathy. But the biggest drawback of this approach is that it is uncritical in nature and by defining it ethical it could not distinguish between the institutions that are inside and outside the state. According to functionalist approach state focuses on role and functions of