In today’s transnational and global age, many nations have encouraged the immigration of highly skilled and affluent workers from other countries to help further develop their own country. The United States was one of the first countries to seek further economic development from highly skilled immigrants with the Immigration Act of 1965. This was a significant moment for immigrants from Asia, Mexico, and Latin America as other exclusion acts favored immigrants coming from the western nations. However, with the Immigration Act of 1965, Asian Americans had the freedom to once again enter the United States but soon faced persecution and quickly fell victim to discrimination. Both past and present Asian immigrants turn to visual and performing …show more content…
Ronald Takaki, an academic scholar who helped pioneer the field of ethnic studies, quoted American politician Norman Mineta in Takaki’s book titled Strangers from a Different Shore. “When one hears Americans tell of the immigrants who built this nation, one is led to believe that all our forebearers [sic] came from Europe. When one hears stories about the pioneers going west to shape the land, the Asian immigrant is rarely mentioned” [Takaki 27]. Many history books leave out the role that Asian American immigrants played in the history of this nation such as the thousands that “helped to build the very transcontinental railroad referred to in the magazine’s announcement and [the] many that settled permanently in California” [Takaki 28]. American history has almost equated the term “American” with “white” or “European” and by doing so leave out the role that Asian Americans have played within the development of America. Now one must rethink the history of America but this time include the Asian American to fully understand the cultural diversity that led to the America known to the world today. The experiences of the various Asian groups- Korean, Japanese, Filipino, Asian Indian, and Southeast Asian- are all very different from each other, yet similar when conducting a cross-national comparison of these different groups of Asian
My research experience so far has been quite smooth, I have been able to read and uncover a variety of sources that contain valuable information about the Chinese immigrants of the late 1800s. More importantly, the sources that I have found are all different; some of my sources are articles, others are flyers, and I even found political cartoons. Learning form a diverse selection of sources has allowed to learn about the situation through different lenses. I have not experienced any frustration through my research, but I am slightly annoyed at the lack of memorial and remembrance for a massive part of U.S. history, especially due to the inhumane treatment of a large groups of people. Toronto has a significantly large memorial for the Chinese
The Chinese immigrant is one of the largest group in the United States. Looking back the history of U.S., most people believe that the first Chinese immigrants came to California during the Gold Rush period. Also, the Chinese community is one of the largest and oldest ethnic group of Asian Americans. Some researchers consider the history of ethnic Chinese in Southern California relates to three periods. In my opinion, I would like to say that there are four major waves which the first wave begins in the 19th century, the second wave occurs in the 1940s to 1980s, the third wave happens during the 1980s, and the last wave arises in a recent decade year.
The opportunities of racial minorities such as the Chinese or African Americans different from those of European immigrants because diversity played a big role in the quality of urban setting. When the industrial revolution happen a lot of immigrant were in search for better economic opportunity, so as Chinese left their home countries due to poverty and famine, cities were the first place they settle down in, making their way to the US they had great opportunity, from owning their own business, opportunity to socialize, opportunity of establishing rotating lending pools, and one of the thing was that they were able to support one another. Moreover, like the Chinese immigrant, European immigrant were also in such for better economic opportunity and religious freedom. Compared to Chinese and African American immigrants, European immigrant had better opportunities for example, European immigrants were considerably older, had higher household incomes, and they were more educated though they were less likely to participate in the labor force. If they did participate in the labor force, they participate at a lower rate than the overall immigrants. A big difference in opportunities that European immigrant had from other immigrants was that you would see them take employment in management, business, science, and arts occupations and they would less likely be employed in occupation such as natural resources, construction, maintenance occupations, production, transportation, and
The United States was founded on the principle that all men are created equal, but during an immigration boom in the late 1890s and early 1900s, Asians and Europeans faced discrimination and violence because of their difference in language, appearance, and religion. People came to America from all over the world to experience the wealth and prosperity that was associated with this great country, but certain ethnicities were excluded from the hope and freedom they were promised by the forefathers. When coming through California, Asians faced with hardships and trials that caused them to return to their country and sometimes to end
In his essay “The Harmful Myth of Asian Superiority”, Ronald Takaki comments on how the Asian race is perceived. He believes that the Asian race is viewed as a “model minority” and he discusses how this perception is both false and harmful. Takaki supports his stance by providing statistical facts about the Asian population in the United States. He further discusses the media’s involvement in the perpetuation (and likely, the genesis) of this perception. Takaki provides statistics that he then compared to other ethnicities in the United States to further solidify his stance. While I tend to agree with most of Takaki’s general thesis, I disagree with how he makes his points.
Asian Americans are a very diverse group in the United States, which include many races such as Chinese, Japanese, Vietnamese, Korean, Filipino, Indian, and many more. Birth country, ancestry, and family heritage are ways to categorize this specific group. According to the 2010 Census, the Asian American population has grown faster than any other group from 2000 to 2010 (Pew Research, 2012). Asian Americans are either immigrants from Asia or are descendants of immigrants. Asian Americans have an extensive history in the United States, starting from the early 19th Century, when many people arrived to work in agriculture, construction, and low-wage jobs. Not until 60 years ago were foreign-born Asian Americans permitted to become U.S. citizens (Pew Research, 2012). The number of Asian Americans in the Unites States continues to increase, and the top six U.S. Asian groups include, Vietnamese, Indian, Chinese, Korean, Filipino, and Japanese (Pew Research, 2012). How do Asian Americans in the United States identity? Do they identify as being American, Asian, or a specific ethnic group? It is interesting to see how different people identify themselves. According to Pew Research, a small percentage of Asian Americans, 14 percent, identify themselves as being American, while only 1 in 5 people describe themselves as being Asian (2012). Therefore, the rest of the population identifies themselves by their country of origin. I argue that all Asian Americans identify differently and
The pain and the suffering, the oppression, and the exclusion all describe the history of Asia America. When they arrived to the United States, they become labeled as Asians. These Asians come from Japan, China, Korea, Laos, Thailand, and many other diverse countries in the Eastern hemisphere. These people wanted to escape from their impoverished lives as the West continued to infiltrate their motherland. They saw America as the promise land filled with opportunity to succeed in life. Yet due to the discrimination placed from society and continual unfair
In the early twentieth century, Asian Americans in the United States faced to lots of obstacles. Since they lived in a “different shore”, they were treated as unassimilable people, and therefore, they experienced many unequal and discriminative treatments. Both Asian Americans lived in Hawaii and the mainland lived in unbearable life under racial discrimination. However, due to geographical and ethnic differences, Asian Americans in the mainland had more difficult time, since majority of the United States’ population were white people. Asian Americans in the mainland had an intense competition with white working class. In other words,
Throughout history many ethnic cliques have experienced abuse and distrust from our American society. The people in America seem to be less understanding, and less willing to accept cultures different from their own, at least years ago. Groups such as the Indians, the African Americans, and the Immigrants, fall deeply into this category. The situations and struggles they have gone through are greatly explained in Ronald Takaki’s novel, “A Different Mirror, A History of a Multicultural America.” Although they have experienced a lot, particular financial and social configuration have changed, helping change our perspective of each civilization, for better or even worse.
Asian immigrants in the history of United States had a hard time gaining legal citizenship. For instance, the Naturalization Act of 1790 excluded both free blacks and Asian Americans from U.S. citizenship, while the 1870 revision expanded the white racial qualification to include “aliens of African nativity and to persons of African descent,” keeping aliens of Asian origin excluded. Even under harsh conditions, Asian immigrants did not give up attempting to be naturalized after 1870. However, it is remarkable that no Asian immigrants sought naturalized citizenship by claiming that they were Blacks. Instead, they learned the strategy to cast themselves as Whites while applying for U.S. citizenship. This noteworthy historical phenomena
Asians have been referred to as the “Model Minority” for decades, but is it an accurate representation of Asian America culture today? This notion derives from the stereotype that Asian families are stable and Asian culture produces success in regards to grades and professions. My questions are as follows: what historical and governmental policies influenced the term, how did it affect Asian-Americans, what should Asian Americans do to be treated equally to improve the rights of their people, and how does this all tie together with the core concept of history & memory? I hope to answer these questions thoughtfully in my essay.
As the immigrant population currently projected to overtake latinxs and hispanics as largest group of residents in the United States of America, Asian Americans have shown their will to survive in a way that many groups have not, and that is by banding together in order to achieve the life they deserve. Taking the overgeneralization of pan-ethnicity and using it as a device for increased numbers and support for the causes of a group of people who otherwise may not have much to do with each other, is a testament to how vulnerable they must have felt as well as how successful they have managed to be many aspects of progress. What I have gained from this course is the understanding that at the root of ethnic studies and the Asian American community is the “for us, by us” sentiment that contributed to the blurred lines between the different part of their communities as social, political and cultural, structures, collectives and groups which came out of an obligation and necessity to protect those immigrants and their future generations from a country which has always pushed European superiority in all aspects of society.
Americans producers relied on consumers in other parts of the world, as capitalism developed as an enterprise. More developed countries drained resources and labor and power of less developed countries. Asian Americans were influenced to migrate to the U.S because their home countries were experiencing an economic decline. Asian Americans had very high hopes for life in America. When Asian’s first migrated to the U.S they were in poverty because they were not making the dollar they thought they would base on capitalism. Capitalism was encouraging immigration of cheap labor force from people from China, and other parts of Asia. China, Japan and Asia countries came to the
In 2012, Pew Research Center characterized Asian Americans as the “highest-income, best-educated, and fastest-growing racial group in the United States.” However, Asians in the United States weren’t always considered the “model minority.” Early Asian immigrants—who were mostly from Japan, China, India, and a smaller number coming from Korea—in the United States were mostly low-skilled male laborers, concentrated in ethnic ghettos, and were provided no paths to naturalized citizenship (J.Lee and Bean 2010). Scholars point to the passage of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 as the keystone moment in Asian immigration that contributed to the current demographic characteristics and assimilation experiences of Asian Americans (J.Lee 2015;
Your post was absorbing. I am often confused about the different ethnic groups in the Asian-Pacific American population. The major ethnic groups consist of Chinese Americans, Filipinos, Indians, Vietnamese, Koreans and Japenese with the Chines Americans being the largest (Hays & Erford, 2014). There is a struggle with Asia Americans holding to their traditional ways while evolving new surviving skills which may result becoming isolated, enmeshed or disengaged (McCormick, Giordano, & Garcia-Preto, 2010, Landau, 1982). However, some Asia Americans are fortunate with the acculturation as they have accepted mostly mainstream American customs (McGoldrick, et al., 2010). Contextually, although those Asians Americans might engage in the United