preview

Askling Trial

Decent Essays
Open Document

- In a prospective randomized controlled trial Askling (2014) compared the effectiveness of lengthening exercises program and conventional exercises program on rehabilitation of acute hamstring injury. Forty-six Swedish sprinters and 10 jumpers with hamstring injuries confirmed by MRI were recruited and assigned unsystematically to lengthening exercises protocol (L-protocol) or conventional exercises protocol (C-protocol). The outcome measurements that used in this study were the number of day to return to sport and the rate of re-injury during 12 months. All participants were evaluated for flexibility and strength, using manual assessment, within two days post injury, and Askling H-test was used at the end of he rehabilitation before allowing athletes to return to sport. …show more content…

All athletes in both groups followed a general rehabilitation program for three times per week if a subject-specific progression was observed. The athletes progress in the rehabilitation if he could perform the general program without pain, which included 10 minutes stationary cycling, fast foot stepping in place, jogging for 40 meters with short strides and forward-backward acceleration. The main result of this study is that the time needed to return was significantly shorter in the L-protocol (mean 49 days) compared to C-protocol (mean 86 days). The re-injury was occurred in two athletes in the C-protocol and no injury was recorded in the L-protocol during one-year follow-up periods. The authors concluded that eccentric exercises program is more effective than conventional protocol in rehabilitation of acute hamstring

Get Access