Assertiveness As A Person Can Possess And Show Essay

The above characteristics are signs of a healthy, confident, and well-adjusted personality. There is not a single undesirable or negative quality on the list. Yet studies show that only five to twenty per cent of the population is assertive!

A person’s personality allows us to see if we are passive or aggressive, along with why a person may be shy or outgoing (Lussier&Achua, 2013). My number one personality trait according to the profile assessment indicates that I am highest in conscientiousness, followed by adjustment, surgency, openness to new experiences, and agreeableness. As we continue to assess my leadership, all of these will play an important role in how I continue to be a strong leader with other motivating factors.

Assertive— people develop positive relationships with others, as they will try to consider other viewpoints as well as presenting their own viewpoint in a clear way. This can lead to better self-image and reduced stress.

Self-efficacy, for the purpose of this study, may be defined as a person’s optimistic self-belief. This is the belief that a person can develop the skills to perform new or difficult tasks to cope with changes in health and functioning. When a person perceives self-efficacy, it will facilitate goal-setting, effort, investment, persistence, overcoming obstacles and recovery from disappointments and failures. It can be regarded as a positive outlook or proactive way to handle stress factors. It is the ability to successfully cope with health changes, and implies an internal and stable acceptance of changes and ability to successfully adapt to those changes. Perceived self-efficacy is functional in

Some descriptive items utilized in the assessment was "I often have a hard time saying 'no,'" or "I tend to bottle up my emotions rather than make a scene." To assess peer reports of assertiveness, I will score the data collected by summing up the total score of each participant which ranged from -90 to 90. Then that total sum would be compared with 764 college women and 637 men from 35 campuses across the United States and converted into a percentage. The sum of assertiveness collected from the survey will be assessed in relation to race and ethnicity and gender of the

To ‘investigate this question we will first discuss, in a theoretical section, the terms “authoritarian personality” and “authoritarianism”, then have a look at the evolution in methods to measure them, with different scales and studies. Secondly, we will discuss the difference between personality and behavior. Then

There are two types of personality tests: objective and projective tests. Both types of tests help clinical psychologists to determine different factors of an individual's personality. Two of the most common objective assessments are the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI-2) and the 16PF. The MMPI-2 is a “567 true/false test that is a good measure of dysfunction within personality” (Framingham, 2016). Of all of the objective assessments the MMPI-2 is the most commonly used. It measures traits such as paranoia, hypomania, social introversion, and psychopathy as well as others by connecting various responses throughout the test. The MMPI-2 is not ideal for those individuals with healthy personalities so that is where the 16PF comes in. The 16PF measures 16 basic personality traits including: warmth, reasoning, emotional stability, dominance, liveliness, rule-consciousness, social boldness, sensitivity, vigilance, abstractness, privateness, apprehension, openness to change, self-reliance, and perfectionism. Because this assessment is done on healthier individuals, it simply allows them to understand themself, and helps their clinical psychologist to determine the best approach in treatment (Framingham,

Upon reflection of the trait approach, which focuses on the personal characteristics that contribute to leadership, I would humbly purport that I possess several attributes that have been consistently identified in the studies referenced in the readings. For example, I have been told many times over the course of my career that I possess a high level of determination. Also, I self-identify as having a high degree of integrity and sociability. These characteristics have enabled my success both in working with teams and more recently as a leader of leaders. However, despite these successes, I still lack self-confidence on occasion. Recognizing this weakness, I need to continue to place myself in situations that push me out of my comfort zone to allow me to build up my self-confidence.

When under pressure this character has the tendency to force-fit solutions when instead they should take the time to analyze their position and relax. This personality type has many positive leadership traits and is a very good description of the dominance style.

Also, in many marriages women have a say in everything the man does. There must be a consensus between both the man and woman. Studies indicate that, “the assertive woman debunks the tired old myths and stereotypes of women bosses, stay-at-home moms, and "bully broads,” and superwomen, and presents a refreshing, positive alternative.” Many studies have shown that assertive women are more successful. Assertive women tend to gain the respect of others as well as raise objections to present feminine stereotypes. For this reason, critics argue that, “women have developed a kind of assertiveness, who lets people know what they want, and what they would not accept, without looking emotional.” By developing this role, women have become victorious individuals.

Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to explore what personality trait I am through taking a personality test. By taking this test it will allow me to analyze my strengths and weaknesses as a person and how to improve those characteristics in the workplace.

The purpose of this paper is to discuss characteristics of my personality. The main focus of this paper will be how my personality has developed over time. As I age and encounter new and different experiences, my personality has adapted and developed further. This paper will give an in-depth exploration into the people and events that have influenced my personality.

Cattell’s 16 Personality Factors Test (“16PF”) (Schultz, 2015, p. 218) lists traits with words we use in everyday language. The 16PF is easy to read and tell how you may score (high, low or midline).

The Type C personality is formed by a number of attributes drawn from Type A and B personalities (Schafer, 2000). Individuals with the Type C personality encounter challenges head-on with success and vitality. Several qualities exhibited by Type Cs include their inspiring self, optimism, impulsive nature, and their vigilant focus (Schafer, 2000). The Type C model, developed by Robert and Marilyn Kriegel (1990, as cited in Schafer, 2000), categorises three patterns; challenge, confidence, and control, which closely resemble the three Cs of the hardy characteristic discussed below.

There are multiple theories of personality and leadership assessments that have proven effective in helping individuals achieve their full career potential. The “Big Five” theory of personality, for example, measures the five broad areas of personality, including extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, and openness to experience (Srivastava, 2015). Other types of assessments, such as the more simple leadership assessment we explored, simply measure leadership qualities, such as emotional intelligence and confidence. In exploring a couple of such resources in more depth, such as the leadership assessment provided by the University of Kent’s Career Enhancement Center, as well as the Myers-Briggs Personality Type Indicator, it is clear that understanding more about oneself can lead to enhanced career choices.