Assignment 1: 7-11 Allegation

The most important food aid program in the nation is SNAP, supplemental nutritional assistance. It helped nearly 46.6 million people in 2012. It has an incredible impact on poverty in the United States. Helped to decrease the number of poor people in America in 2011. A lot of people think that because SNAP is fairly generous with the benefit it gives, that it gives some people no incentive to work. Contrary to popular belief, though, SNAP does not give enough aid for someone to live comfortable without having a job. To many, SNAP is a temporary help when the income for the household is low (“HUNGER”).

The initial program for nutritional support from the government was established in 1964; the program was altered in 1977, and remains the largest federal nutrition program for low-income households (USDA). Census reports from the Department of Agriculture reveal that we more than 47 million low income families rely on the SNAP benefits monthly within the Unites States. However, more than 50% of the recipients are children and elderly residences; about 8% actually receive cash welfare. Approximately 30% of SNAP recipients have earnings, or reside in a household with earnings. Nonetheless, government spending at its highest; money allocated for programs that have little or no monetary return, such as the SNAP program are deemed useless, wasteful, and detrimental to our ever growing capitalist economy. According to the National Institute on Drug Abuse

The application process for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits is a tedious process leaving many students confused on the process. Numerous students who do apply are deemed ineligible for benefits, due to the work requirements (Goldrick-Rab et al., 2017). There were 56 percent of college students who were employed while attending college, with 20 percent working full time (Dubick, et al., 2016). Among the food insecure students attending college, only 38 percent of students employed worked 20 hours or more per week which would make them eligible for SNAP benefits if they were to apply (Dubick et al., 2016). Less than thirty percent of food-insecure college students received SNAP benefits (Goldrick-Rab et al., 2017). There

He provided me his son's SSN. He also read to me the letter his son received from the OPAR. While he read the letter, I opened TRACS and I was able to see that the OPAR was for SNAP back in 2014 for unreported income.

The evaluation that I am conducting investigates that fraud that is committed in the Supplement Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is the United States. I propose that there is more fraud involved in the program than our government will admit. I believe they are mainly concerned with those who abuse the program in a major way as opposed the everyday abuse that is being committed by the average receiver of the SNAP benefits.

The Department’s Representative testified that a redetermination of the Appellant’s eligibility for SNAP benefits for her household of six (6) was completed in May 2016. This redetermination of eligibility was based on the pay stubs provided with the Semi-Annual Reporting (SAR) Form. The Appellant provided two paystubs from each of her employers dated March 4, 2016 and March 18, 2016. The Appellant had a part-time as well as a full-time job. The income was averaged to determine an approximate gross monthly income of $715.82 from her part-time employer and $1852.12 from her full-time employer. The Appellant was given the deduction of $570.00 for her heating allowance and $124.00 for her child care expenses. When the

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), formerly known as food stamps, is a social welfare program designed to increase the nutritional value of a low-income household’s food supply. It does this through Electronic Benefits Transfer (EBT) cards that are loaded with a monetary allotment based on family size and income, which can then be redeemed for groceries at participating SNAP stores (Karger & Stoesz, 2014). 46.2 million Americans participated in the program in 2011 (Andrews & Smallwood, 2012). Yet the program did not always function in the way it currently does. Originally enacted in the 1960s, this program has undergone many changes over the years. There are many factors, including historical and economic elements, which

Research has found that SNAP participants often participate in other public assistance programs (Cody, et al., 2007; Moffit, 2015). Literature has also shown that individual work status of prime age adults is related to SNAP participation; prime age adults with children or who participate in other assistance program that also participate in SNAP often are working low income households (Zedlewski & Rader, 2005). Acs and Schwabish (2011) examine the relationship between SNAP participation and work status given national level policy changes to the SNAP program in the Food Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002. They find after 2002 fewer individuals left the program overall and this effect was not limited to long term recipients. Suggesting the changes in SNAP policy encouraged more recipients to seek work and still receive SNAP and did not necessarily increase the number of working households to newly join SNAP. Between 2002 and 2007 SNAP participation among low-income families whom work grew by 10% (Cody, et al., 2007;Ratcliffe, Mckernan, & FInegold,

Its results are analyzed according to the rubric for such an assessment published by Mettler (2011). The SNAP program started in 1933 as part of the Agricultural Adjustment Act (AAA). Initially, the program was called the Federal Surplus Relief Corporation and was established during the Great Depression (1929–1939), when crop prices plunged and farms struggling with excess and unsellable supply. To intervene and help the farmers, the federal government bought the surplus at a discount and spread the food among hunger relief agencies at the state and local levels (The History of SNAP,

In an effort to aid with the hunger in the United States, the federal government offers and assistance program call Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). The program was originally called the Food Stamp Program. SNAP provides financial benefits to eligible recipients in order for them to purchase food at supermarkets or various stores for themselves and their family to partake in at home. The amount of benefits is calculated based on the household income and the number of household members. SNAP has shown to help decrease food insecurity in the United States. (Colson, 2015). As of October 2016, there were 21,328,525 households in the United States that participated in receiving benefits from SNAP program. In just Alabama, there were 385, 902 household that received supplemental nutrient assistance. (USDA,

In studies reviewed by James Levine, over 3,000 US counties were observed. He found that 43% of households that are living under the poverty line ($21,756) are living with food insecurity. In accordance to the 15.1% of Americans living in poverty, 14% of the counties reviewed have more than 1 in 5 individuals use the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). The service of the program in the counties correlates with the county-wide poverty rates (Levine 2667).

In the following paper, the topic of food stamps or the official name Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) which is defined on the government website as “SNAP offers nutrition assistance to millions of eligible, low-income individuals and families and provides economic benefits to communities. SNAP is the largest program in the domestic hunger safety net”.(2017) The argument in the paper is the fighting for or against the continuation of SNAP within the United States of America. Some main points that will be covered in this essay are if SNAP should be continued, should or should not there be an increase in the amount of money given to people on welfare and food stamps, and should the government drug test people that want food stamps.

Fortunately, there are several government programs available for families facing food insecurity. One example is the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), which helps low-income families afford nutrient rich foods and was formerly known as food stamps (“Supplemental Nutrtion…”, 2017). While this program aids individuals of all ages, there are also programs that are aimed at specific age groups. Another program is the Commodity Supplemental Food Program (CSFP), which assists low-income elderly individuals above sixty years old and provides them with healthy foods (“Commodity Supplemental…”, 2017). On the other end of the spectrum, the Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) program allots federal grants for the health care and nutrition

Mrs. Trujillo , . Good morning , thank you for the information provided to sponsor our client Cesia Hernandez-Rubio . Can you provide me with a copy of your husbands proof of citizenship . Furthermore , I saw you provided me with the total amounts jointly claimed for the past 2 years (2014/2015 ) in this case I will also be needing you to please to provide me with each individual income claimed for those years as well . As soon as I get that information from you I will be preparing the forms and emailing them to you for review and signatures . In advance thank you for your prompt attention to this matter

Nationwide, the misuse of the Electronic Benefits Transfer Cards is only a portion of the many fraudulent acts commitment by welfare recipients in the states. Buying or selling EBT cards is a federal crime, which is implemented in all states. The United States has also collaborated with Canada for The United Council on Welfare Fraud. The UCOWF is made up of various roles such as investigators, workers and claim writers from local, state and federal agencies in the United States and Canada (Gazso, 2010).