Assignment “Introduction to Leadership”

My leadership style is about how I treat under me with respect, approachable and willing to listen with different suggestions in decision making. I want to have a cooperative teamwork, little supervision, and motivation with professionalism. There is always room for training in developing skills and expertise and encouragement to go above and beyond.

Leadership is a process through which an individual influences others to accomplish an objective and directs the organization in a way that makes it more cohesive and coherent. This definition of leadership is relatively similar to that of Northouse’s (2007,p.3) And the

According to Yukl (1994), “leadership is a process which one member of a group influences other group members towards attainment of specific group goals”.

Based on the reading it is hard to give a single leadership style or even a combination of leadership styles because there are so many different levels of productions and management for this project. Each level of management will have their own required type of leadership and while some styles may overlap,

Leadership has been described as the “process of social influence in which one person can enlist the aid and support of others in the accomplishment of a common task”...

During my examination of the various types of leadership styles, I was able to take a few assessments online. There were two that stood out the most for me which, were The Type A and B personality indicator and the Hemisphere Dominance Personality Assessment. I found that the style that these two assessments closely matched my own style.

Leadership is and has been described as the “process of social influence in which one person can enlist the aid and support of others in the accomplishment of a common task”[1]. A definition more

Now I also delegate some responsibility to capable individuals e.g. Tim is our Fire Warden, he attends Staff Forums, Naomi will be attending Children Experience Group and Marina meetings about Dementia, but not because there are more experienced that I am, just to show them I trust them, to develop them and motivate and also, because I do not have time to do everything

Leaderships are to focus on the goals of being a leader. An instrumental leader wants to ahead of all task seriously. So, she will give it to her top worker that she knows will succeed. Expressive leader is there to support you, they are there to make sure you have everything together emotionally. Also, a democratic leader is the leader to make sure everyone is all happy with the decisions to the point where it’s a vote to accommodate everyone. The laissez-faire leader is the same as the democratic but it’s not really a debate it’s just

Leadership is the ability to influence others and directing their behavior to achieve common goals. It is therefore the responsibility of the seat toward the group to reach the set objectives.Another definition: is a process designed to influence the behavior of individuals and to coordinate their efforts to achieve certain goals.Leader: is the person who uses his influence and power to affect the behavior and attitudes of people around him to accomplish specific objectives.The wise leadership that will be able to lead others in order to achieve outstanding achievements and this kind of leadership have a head start in understanding the current situation and what affect it of developments as they be able to understand what will be the future

We have learned from an early in our careers what leadership is, what it means and how we should apply it. Since 1981, I have seen and studied many styles. We also learn what leadership should not be by watching examples of poor leadership. Leadership styles change, evolve and most people attempt new methods to achieve the end goal. That is to influencing others to accomplish the mission by providing purpose, motivation and direction. Newer definitions add “to improve the organization”. All of this is what we have been taught and most leaders can and will adapt to change. One key element is to be able to read people and organizations to determine the culture and people to find out what motivates individuals. Teams and organizations are made up of people not machines.

In terms of leadership styles a wide variety exists for one to employ (Boykins, 2013). There isn’t firm consensus as to which styles prove to be the most effective. Different situations call for different approaches. In the article, Empirical Study of Leadership Styles, it discusses several leadership styles that I can relate to.

The basic premise for leadership is the process of influencing other people to follow your lead in order to accomplish a goal. It is about the relationship between the leader and the followers. A good leader tries to motivate people to bring about positive changes revealing a common objective without using coercion or manipulation. Leadership is not about control, but permitting interaction and communication between the leader and the individual followers. With empowering others, leaders build a foundation of collaborative thinking and encourage an atmosphere of personal involvement; a leader can strengthen the respect and loyalty of his or her followers. Leaders can affect this process by applying their own personal characteristics, such

Leadership is an approach for a leader to guide, motivate, supervise, manage, and influence others in different situation to reach a goal. According to the Pettinger (2007), the leadership can be explained in several situations. First, the leaders have the responsible to provide vision and direction to the followers. Second, the leaders shall energise and motivate the followers. Third, the leaders shall set and enforce absolute standards of behaviour, attitude, presentation and performance.

In the textbook Leadership is defined as ‘the process of influencing an organized group toward accomplishing its goals’ (Hughes, Ginnet & Curphy 2015, p. 5). Leadership involves leader, followers, and situation.