Assisted Suicide Argumentative Essay

prescribe drugs to terminally ill patients who request to end their lives. Attorney General John

How does one know when a practice is morally sound or not? Is it the information that follows it? Is it the ethics involved in the situation? Is it the persons involved happiness or their autonomy? Constantly this question is being asked about every single medical decision out there. One of the most debated topics right now is physician assisted suicide. This is the idea that a doctor can prescribe medication to patients so they can pass away on their own terms. In the rest of the essay one will find what physician assisted suicide or death is and how it came to be. One will be able to learn a real life example of how it works in America right now and why it should be implemented all over the rest of the country. One will also

deaths every day. Within these 153,000 deaths, about 90% of them are terminally ill patients

Physician Assisted Suicide is not just an easy way out; but a dignified way to end their suffering. It is within the patient’s rights to decide if they want to live or die and how they follow through with this act. In 2006, Attorney General John Ashcroft went to court against the state of Oregon saying that the Death with Dignity Act violated the Controlled Substance Act because it is not a “legitimate reason” for medication (Yeh, 2006). Aschcroft wanted to revoke all licenses for doctors who participate in PAS and those who grant immunity to physicians participating. The court ruled against Ashcroft 6-3, reporting allowing physicians to prescribe a lethal dose (Wisconsin Right to Life, n.d.). Jack Kevorkian, also known as Dr. Death, is a

Physician assisted suicide is a safe way for a patient to achieve the outcome that they wish for. There are many positive outcomes that results from physician assisted suicide. These include, not having to suffer a long and painful death, being in control of your own body and to receive the treatment that they want. The patient has decided that there are no other options for them. According to the hippocratic oath, a doctor’s main goal is to help their patient, which sometimes results in helping them with their death.

On January 2014, Brittany Maynard married to Dan Diaz, was only 29 years old when she was diagnosed with stage 4 brain cancer and was told she had 6 months to live. Brittany decided to relocate to Oregon from California as she intended to end her own life by physician assisted suicide. Oregon is one of the 3 states in the United States which have specific laws that allow for legal assisted suicide. Oregon allows residents with terminal illnesses to end their own lives with lethal drugs provided by physician and it’s legal since 1994, it is termed as Oregon’s Death with Dignity Law. Brittany Maynard’s decision to end her own life has reignited the right-to-die and assisted suicide debate. After the controversial case of Maynard, California

Physician-Assisted Suicide (PAS) is a measure taken to end the suffering of terminally ill patients. It should be a right granted to all citizens who are suffering from a degenerative, painful, or fatal condition that would cause them to be unable to enjoy their lives. There are multiple definitions within the medical and legal communities about assisted suicide, but in general, the utmost debate is when a suicide is assisted by a physician as opposed to private citizens or family member. Even though the benefits of assisted suicide for the terminally ill individual are incredibly significant, the debate is not free from questions about the responsibilities of the medical community such as those offered by enthusiasts

Many of these previous arguments are valid. There is little I can say against the doctor having control over death by having the ability to save and the ability to kill. They’re many “correct” ways to look at this idea. A completely viable way to look at it is that he becomes a master of death by controlling death and life with patients which is a power most would say only belongs to god and if not god, it belongs to no one. Another way to look at it is through the patient's perspective. I touched on this right at the beginning of this argument but when someone fears tomorrow more than death itself, the doctor is no longer a killer. The doctor stops hearts from beating but he isn’t a killer. The doctor is supposed to do everything in his power

In the fourth century B.C. doctors followed the Hippocratic Oath, which was an oath that said the rules of the medical industry and the doctor’s policy. Those who took the oath were mostly incoming doctors or people who were in the medical industry. The Hippocratic Oath states “I will apply dietetic measures for the benefit of the sick according to my ability and judgment; I will keep them from harm and injustice. I will neither give a deadly drug to anybody who asked for it, nor will I make a suggestion to this effect.” (End of Life: Ethical Considerations paragraph 32) This directly states that the doctors back then were not allowed to perform assisted suicide at any cost. Although, in modern times the Hippocratic Oath now states “Most especially must I tread with care in matters of life and death. If it is given me to save a life, all thanks. But it may also be

To begin with, in my own opinion, yes I do believe suicide is justifiable if the person is dealing with a horrible debilitating illness that there is no hope of recovery and that they suffer horribly on a daily even hourly basis from. I believe assisted suicide for these same types of illness at the right time should be allowed as well. I’ve watched close relatives and am watching one now, die slowly from cancer with excruciating pain, nausea, weigh lose to nothing but skin and bones, lesions, sores, etc… I love & loved these people and never want to lose them but when there is no way back, and it is medically proven, why can they not have a peaceful ending to the agony? I honestly would want it assisted so it is painless yet if the law, here in Tennessee and most states, stops medical physicians and hospice from assisting, then yes if the victim can find a safe, for sure method, why not. We can put our animals down that are in pain and suffering but not our realities, even if they want this themselves, the law stops this and it should not. Keep in mind this is my opinion, from my observations only. With this said, I would want to point out that assisted suicide is legal, with the strictest of guidelines medically, in the states of Oregon and Washington (Humphrey & Schmalleger, 2012).

On November 1, 2014, twenty-nine year old Brittany Maynard ended her life. However, she was not suicidal. Brittany had a rare brain cancer and was given six months to live. She decided it would be better to die peacefully then to spend her last months suffering and to die a painful death. Brittany, like other terminally ill patients, opted for doctor-assisted suicide. The idea for doctor assisted suicide, or voluntary euthanasia, has been around for a long time, and studies have shown that the ancient Greeks and Romans tolerated it. In 1870,Samuel Williams wanted to use chloroform to “deliberately hasten the death of terminally ill patients,” according to Wikipedia. Today, it is legal in some countries, US States, and

would you kill yourself if you were dying to put yourself out of misery? People in America are very upset that assisted suicide is legal in some states. A lot of Americans believe it is wrong and should be illegal. Should a person be able to kill them self if they want to? I believe they should, and that family members need to be willing to accept. If the fact of situation is if Love someone you should be willing to accept their decisive, even if you don’t agree with it.

Medically assisted suicide has been around for years, although it was and is illegal in most places. This practice is suicide done a doctor to end a chronically ill person’s life. Religion plays a big role in whether or not this is allowed on a person. Some religions believe it is okay only if the person is on their dying bed, while other religions believe it is a sin and betraying God. There was once a doctor who did these medically assisted suicides, his name was Jack Kevorkian. People believed he was dangerous and on a killing spree, when in reality he was just granted the wishes of the chronically ill. Also Emile Durkheim had two theories that will be discussed briefly, about suicide. He talks about who commits it and why. Suicide is never the answer, unless someone is on their death bed.

First of all, many support assisted suicide because they believe that it is a humane, free choice that every patient desire. A person have the right to end their life allows them death with dignity. It’s a free will because no patients should have the righteous to suffer dying without lethal dose from seeking freedom and authority. Let’s assume a person is being placed on life support, he or she feels have a unconscious mind. Which an individual cannot say or do anything and disabled if they’re in a vegetative state. In a way that it allows physician to grant medication whether he or she want to be euthanized. This statement insists that assisted suicide is a way of life, not a threat:

Many believe that a person has the right to do what they wish with their bodies and what it can endure. But in some cases, a patient can encounter a situation that they have to recognize that their body does not have the capacity to function the way it should. This is where the option of assisted suicide comes to play, the patient must decide whether they would want to end their treatment knowing that it will only delay the inevitable. In Canada, a patient does have the option of assisted suicide with a few conditions. One is that “they are at least 18 years of age and capable of making decisions with respect to their health” (Criminal Code, 1895). This age restriction to some patients could appear more painful than their actual illness. This is regarding the patients who are children that will experience similar circumstances with those who are older. The only difference is they must endure all that pain, suffering, and feeling of uselessness until they are even fortunate enough to