The Bakhtiari and Assyrian cultures, in will be compared and contrasted in this paper. The Bakhtiari are a tribal society, who came about in 1300 BC and have been existing ever since (Howarth 1976). The Assyrians were a state-level society, starting in the beginning of the second millennium BC and met their end in 626 BC. These cultures did not exist at the same time, and is key in understanding their topics of comparison. In this paper, the points of comparison are their ways of sustaining life: how they provide food, how they live, and how their environments play a part in their societal structure. I will then conclude the paper with a summary on the past presenting itself today—within today’s Bakhtiari society and within the region of the …show more content…
Not just with each other in marriages and the dowries that come with it, but also with outside cultures and societies. The Bakhtiari are not the only ones among the Zagros mountains, now and then they come across other tribes. Their herds provide sale through their animals’ slaughter, skin, wool, hair, and leather. These resources can be used to feed a community, as well as provide tools and clothing (Iranica 1988). Similarly, the Assyrians also realized this second asset of income and trade by becoming herders. Their wide-open spaces not only was herd-friendly, but also allowed them to venture out of their empire, and explore resources not indigenous to their land. By creating colonies in Anatolia, the Assyrians were able to establish trading posts and gain metals newly founded in the Bronze Age. The Assyrians now relied on trade, but it did not mean the ruled Mesopotamia. The Sumerians, Babylonians, and Akkadians were all fighting to build their empires alongside the Assyrians. Everyone wanted what each other had and wide valleys and plains allowed for controversy to occur. The Assyrians ruled the trade market, but were consistently overruled by their neighbors who wanted to take their land. As discussed in lecture, the Assyrians were the junk yard dog. They got beat, harassed, and bombarded numerous of times that they decided it were to happen no more. The Assyrians became …show more content…
Assyrians face the same struggle they did at the end of their empire—no place to call home. In 1915, the genocide in World War I began and the Ottoman Empire killed off 750,000 Assyrians (AINA 2015). Those who survived, fled trying to find another place to start anew, and that did not work out quite well. In 2014 & 2015, the Islamic State (ISIS) continues the terrorizing job of the Ottoman Empire, and causes over 200,000 Assyrians to leave their homes and villages behind (AINA 2015). Assyrians are in constant fear and have accustomed to fleeing and finding a new village to live. Even as they flee to the United States, nothing is stopping ISIS or other entities from pushing them out of their American homes. If fleeing to natural barriers, instead of inflicting terror was the strategy, the Assyrians would be able to withstand the hardships the middle east holds today. The Bakhtiari proves this factor, by their perseverance seen today and could be another great asset for the
Because of this, the Mesopotamians were able to take advantage of the natural resources in the Fertile Crescent, and develop a surplus of food. Because of this, no one in the civilization would grow hungry, and they would have more goods to trade, which made Ancient Mesopotamia a very wealthy
The Assyrians never developed effective tactics for controlling larger empires, having progressively less control the farther away from the core the population was, never less, the Assyrians Used exceptional techniques for controlling and expanding their empire utilizing all citizens for both their wealth and labor to expand and improve extremely quickly
The reliefs from the palace of King Assurnasirpal II at Nimrud play an important role in portraying the power and importance
The Persian Empire overtook the weakening Babylonian empire under the rule of Cyrus and then expanded under his successors. The Persian Empire was unique in its ruling over the people that it had conquered, especially under the rule of Cyrus and Darius.1 In order to ensure that the empire would continue to flourish, in spite of its expansion and increasing size, the Persian rulers integrated the local cultures and peoples, which benefitted both the Empire and those they conquered.2 Although they were a conquered people, the Mesopotamian people, including and maybe especially Babylon, profited and prospered economically and culturally and enjoyed greater privileges politically then they could have hoped for under the ruler ship of other conquerors.
Geographic differences between these two countries were a major factor in determining stability. Mesopotamia rose out of a
The Assyrians were very successful as empire-builders. Although the Sea People destroyed their domain a couple of times, the Assyrians still managed to revive creating the “Neo-Assyrian Empire,” in which their realm expanded especially in the Middle East and took control over Egypt. During the Neo-Assyrian Empire, the Assyrians were able to master the skill at using chariots and the proficiency of iron smelting. They developed iron weapons and the first true cavalry force that gave them a huge advantage over their neighbors who still used copper and tin weapons. Consequently, the Assyrians became an unrivaled power over the ancient Near East and began exploring artworks and ways they could adorn their cities. The Assyrians were also famous for building great roads that allowed them to move quickly from place to place. Likewise, they built amazing cities with fortified walls, canals,
Ancient Egypt and Mesopotamia present a valuable area of historical research. They are of great importance mostly because of their ethnic kinship (Watson, 2017). In such case, comparison and contrast essay is very promising as causal relationships can be formed based on a mutual starting point. This comparison-contrast essay focuses on differences and similarities in these societies’ economic, political and cultural life in order to make further implications regarding the circumstances the peoples of ancient Egypt and Mesopotamia faced.
With governmental machinery that brought political and social order to their territories, effective political and military power enabled them to build regional empires and expand their authority to neighboring people. Ancient Egypt and Mesopotamia were two great civilizations among the earliest to emerge in the Middle east and North Africa. Both made significant contributions in areas such as mathematics, medicine, agriculture, astronomy, technology, architecture, art and writing. They had differences as well, including their political structures. Most importantly is that Egyptians were under a centralized government, and the Mesopotamians had self-controlled city state governments.
The Middle Assyrian Laws are a selection of laws also known as the Code of the Assyrians. They are composed in the wedge shaped writing system of ancient Mesopotamia. There are only twenty-eight given in the source but the actual number of codes in the society is uncertain. The codes listed are out of order and many numbers are missing. The documents were written in Akkadian, one of the earliest Semitic languages, in the Middle Assyrian dialect. The particular author of these codes is unknown. The existing copies though were apparently edited during the reign of the Assyrian king Tiglath- pileser I. The texts were found during the excavation of the site of Qal’at Shergat (ancient Assur) in northern Iraq in the early twentieth century. The existing copies number about fifteen tablets, one of which is duplicated by a copy that dates to the Neo – Assyrian period, around 900-612 BCE. The relationship of the document to each other is unclear. The evidence as to why these were written and whom they directly affect is not clear. The laws primarily target the relationship between male and female. The significance of the source is ambiguous, but based off of the time in history and people targeted in the law codes, the people who lived here were men and woman in relationships with one another. The codes explain the consequences, rules, and way of life in this time period.
In the following treatise, the research that will be presented will provide criteria involving similarities and differences in three attributes of life in the four primary river valley civilizations. The river valley civilizations are composed of Mesopotamia, Egypt, the Indus Valley, and China. While each of these civilizations is unique in their habits and traditions, they share many similar qualities. For this work to be as comprehensive as possible, the primary focus will be on comparing and analyzing the cultures and ambiance, or environments, political organization and religious beliefs, and social structures of each society. The following categories are going to be analyzed by utilizing the frameworks of the four river valley civilizations. Without further ado, a juxtaposition of the ancient river valley civilizations.
Mesopotamians developed specialized crafts and supported private entrepreneurship. They also were involved in foreign and domestic trade.
From 1567 to 330 B.C. humanity experienced many subsequent development as well as decline in its civilizations. Among these events emerged three colossal empires that had shaken the world and forever changed the course of human history. The Egyptian, Assyrian, and Persian Empires have been instrumental in influencing technology, religion, and ideas throughout the world. Various factors have contributed to the success and downfall of these giants. Each of the “World Powers” have similarities as well as distinctions in its government form and organization, religion, and economy that contributed to their triumph.
The Illyrians are the ancestors of today’s modern Albanians, and were an Indo-European people. This group first migrated into the area between the Adriatic Sea and Sava River during the Middle to Late Bronze age circa 2000-1200 BC (Harding, 1992:17; Srejovic, 1998:14; Stipčević, 1977; Wilkes, 1992:37-39). The Illyrian domain would grow to cover the western Balkans, between the Middle Danube valley, and the Adriatic Sea (Harding, 1992; Wilkes, 1992:92). Today this expanse is made up of, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo, Slovenia, Macedonia, Croatia, Serbia, Montenegro, and of course Albania. The Illyrians began to populate much of this region during the Middle to Late Bronze age circa 2000-1200 BC (Harding, 1992:17; Srejovic, 1998:14; Wilkes, 1992:37-39). Even though the term Illyrian referred to a single tribe, it soon became synonymous to all who were similar both culturally and linguistically (Srejovic, 1998:14). Their language is distinctive from Greeks, Macedonians, and the Thracians, which is beneficial when identifying the various Illyrian districts (Harding, 1992:16;
The Middle Assyrian Laws are a collection of laws that were put together for the people of Mesopotamia, although the author is unknown. These codes of law were originally written in Akkadian, one of the earliest Semitic languages. The excerpts are from the Code the Assyrians, which was made in 1075 BCE. According to the document, They were found during the twentieth century in ancient Assur (currently Northern Iraq) at the site of Qal’ at Shergart. These laws are significant because they implemented structure into their society by setting standards for what women and men can and cannot do. They are important to us today because they give us valuable ideas as to how ancient society was in Mesopotamia, particularly gender roles in 1075 BCE.
It is undeniable that the natural environment of ancient Mesopotamia had a profound effect on the earliest civilizations known to the world. Humankind’s ability to control irrigation waters directly correlates with the rise of mass agriculture. With this mastery of their river environment, early farmers were capable of supporting large urban populations. However, in Mesopotamia the Tigris and Euphrates rivers were both a source of life as well as destruction for early societies. In many ways, the geography of ancient Mesopotamia fostered a sense of catastrophic determinism within the Sumerians, Akkadians, and Babylonians. The scarcity of resources as well as the untamable nature of their deluge environment led these early people to