Astoria, Queens : Website Analysis

Wikipedia officials agree — in part — with Middlebury’s history department. “That’s a sensible policy,” Sandra Ordonez, a spokeswoman, said in an e-mail interview. “Wikipedia is the ideal place to start your research and get a global picture of a topic, however, it is not an authoritative source. In fact, we recommend that students check the facts they find in Wikipedia against other sources. Additionally, it is generally good research practice to cite an original source when writing a

In the Article “Wikipedia Comes of Age” by Casper Grathwohl is published by The Chronicle of Higher Education. His point of view in this article is Wikipedia can be a good source but students and researchers may mistake this as a reliable source. He claims that it is a good formal source instead of main source. The Author feels it confuses students and researchers by having it peer reviewed,edited and having it change all the time can be unreliable for a source. The author talks about the past when you could go into a bookstore to look up facts and references in the past like it’s a lifetime ago but in actuality it was just a short time ago.

Davidson begins his article with arguably one of the most notable and recent subjects of gentrification, 1520 Sedgwick, the birthplace of Hip-Hop. This dilapidated apartment building’s owners “announced they planned to leave New York State’s Mitchell-Lama programe” (pg. 2), which would result in the current residents evictions. Essentially the program offered tax incentives to building owners who limit equity to maintain low cost units. However, in lieu of tax incentives many building owners have elected to leave the program in order to make more profit via higher costing units, which current residents cannot afford. In the case of 1520 Sedgwick current and former residents, such as the credited father of Hip-Hop Kool Herc, have veiled their mission to prevent the gentrification process from consuming their building by petitioning for a historic listing as well as offering to

Many would comment that gentrification will change the atmosphere of a city. What if that meant protecting its citizens by establishing a safer neighborhood? In the article series “York&Fig At the Intersection of Change”, Marina Bellizzi, a former citizen of Highland Park, a city which is facing gentrification, was interviewed on how much her hometown has changed since she left for college. She attended a local high school in Highland Park describing her time there as embarrassing and underprivileged, “we had pregnant teenagers, we had unsuccessful teachers. So, there was a lot of shame that was thrown at going to my high school” (“Gentrifiers”). Now Bellizzi says that the high school is being “perceived as this positive place” ( “Gentrifiers”). This is one of the many pieces of evidence that prove how a safer community changes the perspective of a town. Another piece of evidence that proves how gentrification can change for the better is seen in the city of Los Angeles. According to LA Weekly, reporter Art Tavana stated that the result of gentrification in the Los Angeles area has affected the crime rate, “For the past 11 years, crimes rates in L.A have generally dropped”. The author of the article describes that demographics have changed saying “gang members on a street corner throwing gang signs are now equivalent to members of the Tea Party hanging out in West Hollywood” (Tavana). In other

Discussions between users and editors also take place to ensure the quality and correct information is being published. Wikipedia does realize that work does get by them from time to time and admits that some of the work is complete nonsense. They do not want their work to be used for crucial information but rather to familiarize oneself with a new topic. New ways of governing the website are constantly being explored to improve the overall quality of the work being shared. Ultimately it is the users responsibility to double check information with other sources when needing to find out and use significant information. It has been a very helpful tool throughout the years to find information quickly and is generally a dependable way of finding out new

The main people get around by privately owned vehicles. There were numerous car rental places and I noted 5 bus stops within a short distance near by the neighborhood. The streets are narrow throughout the neighborhood, with no sidewalks, and numerous pot holes. Located closer to the school were painted side walks and crossing guards during school hours. The main streets on the outer boundaries of the neighborhood were evenly paved, had crosswalks and sidewalks.

Conversations surrounding gentrification have evolved, as many in the social-scientific community have questioned the negative connotations associated with the word gentrification. One example is that gentrification can lead to more displacement for lower-income families in gentrifying neighborhoods; however, every neighborhood faces unique challenges and reasons for displacement vary. Generally, gentrification is considered to improve the neighborhood for the people moving into the

We have reached the halfway point for our classes. It is amazing how quickly time gets going once homework starts coming due. This week we are discussing unreliability in our research sources. This is an extremely important topic because one bad piece of information in your paper can lead to a loss of credibility. The first topic for our forum this week is why Wikipedia is an unreliable and unaccepted source. Plan and simple, anyone can go on a Wikipedia page and change the information to whatever they want. I have known this for a long time. I was very fortunate to have a college professor who informed our class that the idea of Wikipedia is letting anyone post material about anything they want. This includes changing text

This paper assesses the evolution and impact of gentrification on a beautiful beachside neighborhood known as Venice over the past two decades. Due to the fact that I’ve spent a fairly good amount of my time throughout Venice, I have a great sense of the community and the culture. But this community had gone through a lot, one being gentrification. Before gentrification, Venice had a very natural society, accepting everyone for who they are. Venice was and frankly still is a beautiful place to go for a jog or hang out with friends on the beach.

Wikipedia is more often than not viewed as an unreliable source when doing research for any particular topic and the reason is the fact that normal people are able to edit any Wikipedia post. It’s so easy for people use Wikipedia as a source simply because it is the first source that comes up when doing a search on a topic and people just assume that everything is correct when that might not be the case. I will be looking at a Wikipedia post about Julius Caesar and seeing the changes that have been made over time to more accurately tell us information about this topic. I will also compare this Wikipedia to another established reference source such as the Encyclopedia Britannica (EB). The purpose of this comparison is to see how authoritative

The first observation noted that there’s an issue with the Wikipedia site is their home web page. The home page of the online encyclopedia has a welcome page that boasts, “Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit” (Wikipedia, 2015). This method is in opposition of what I would deem highly credible. Anyone could be an Eight-year-old or a person that is mentally ill. In my opinion, the open editing system is the strength and the weakness of the website. There is the chance that the social encyclopedia’s contributors may not create university level articles worthy of citing as a primary source for an academic paper. Another issue is that Wikipedia seems to depend on the hopes that its user will apply the golden rule that is “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.” It seems Wikipedia depends on the kindness of its users and hopes that they will post accurate

Since the early 2000s, gentrification accelerated in various New York City neighborhoods. Data shown that about 29.8 percent of New York City has been affected by gentrification in low-income communities (Governing Data 1). This is over a 20 percent increased from the previous decade in New York City alone. Gentrification is a term used to describe displacement or renewal in urban neighborhoods as a result of increasing property values and rent prices. Gentrification has existed since the 1960s but has rapidly increased since then . Gentrification has now become a common and global controversial topic in many low-income neighborhood. Although, gentrification hasn’t always been bad from increasing job opportunities to lowering crime rates. Gentrification has impacted and transformed underprivileged districts in New York City. However, at the advantage of who ? Thus, gentrification has only increased average rates of poverty and infused neighborhoods with “white privilege”.

Throughout the years, neighborhoods have developed in many different ways. One major change can be seen by looking at the people residing in an area. Another way is by looking at the mode of transportation used by people living in the neighborhood. In this paper, I will be critically analyzing the neighborhood of Astoria, Queens in order to prove whether or not the people’s rights to the city is justified by city developments.

The Wikipedia is a free, online encyclopedia that lets every individual with Internet connection write and edits its articles. Jimmy Wales and Larry Sanger launched their creation in 2001 giving an opportunity to all willing people to work together to develop a common resource of knowledge. Many people have different believes and ideas about Wikipedia, therefore, some tend to think of it as a credible and valid source of information, others strongly disagree. “Since all the books and articles have been chosen for publication, each one has presumably undergone some form of selection and review” (Spatt, 2011, “p.”339-340). Unfortunately, this statement is simply not enough to

Wikidata is a central repository collecting structured data via collaborative online communities. It has provided sup- port for the content of Wikipedia and as well as other sites1. Like many other projects that rely on contributions from volunteer users, Wikidata content are largely edited by vol- unteers (more than fifteen thousand active users2) from di- verse locations, backgrounds and skill levels. It is inevitable there is demand in understanding the quality and trustwor- thiness of Wikidata. One thing sets Wikidata apart from other linked open data repository is its focus on curating sourced data which makes each statement verifiable. How- ever, the reality is not only there are a large number of statements without any references, but also there is no over- all view of how good the sources are for the statements with references.