At Financial Comparisons Between Pepsico, Inc., And Coca Cola

3. Using the cash flow indicator and investment valuation ratios, discuss which company is more likely to have satisfied stockholders.

This is a financial comparison between Pepsi and Coca Cola in terms of company liquidity, solvency, asset management, profitability, and valuation between the years 2008 and 2009 respectively.

When we see the total revenues of Coca Cola, they were $21742 and $23104 in the years 2004 and 2005 respectively. Revenues in both the years for Coca Cola were lesser than those of Pepsi Co. The net sales of the Coca Cola in the year 2005 were 6.25% more than in the year 2004. This also means that the net revenues in 2005 were 106.25% of the net revenues in 2004.

The analysis of a company's financial statements helps in the determination of both the weaknesses and strengths of the concerned entity. Further, such an analysis helps in the determination of the future viability of firms. There are a wide range of techniques utilized in the analysis of financial statements. In that regard, it is important to note that the relevance of a horizontal, vertical as well as ratio analysis of a company's financial statements cannot be overstated. This is more so the case when it comes to the interpretation of the various dollar amounts presented in both the balance sheet and the income statement. In this text, I carry out a horizontal, vertical as well as ratio analysis of both The Coca-Cola Company and PepsiCo, Inc. The analysis' results will be critical in the evaluation of each company's performance. Findings will be used as a basis for recommendations on how each company can improve its financial status.

According to PepsiCo “Organic revenue grew 5 percent in the fourth quarter and in the full year, reported net revenue declined 1 percent for the quarter and 1.5 percent for the full year, reflecting the impact of previously announced structural changes” (PepsiCo, 2013). The cost of running the business paid off from a revenue standpoint but overall net revenue fell by one percent. Additionally, Pepsi remained exceedingly concentrated on generating appealing returns for shareholders, and returned $6.5 billion to shareholders in 2012 “through a combination of share repurchases and dividends,” (Pepsi, 2013) This increased costs for the company but the cost spending implemented paid off for shareholders who would be more willing to invest more in the company in the future.

Keeping good records is a key in any good business and it helps companies find key areas where they feel they can improve. Coke and Pepsi are two large named soda distributers that have been along for many years and are constantly being compared. Before obtaining both companies financial statements, I was kind of clueless in who was more financially set but knew both were respectable companies. In this essay, I am going to

For more than a century, Coca Cola and PepsiCo have been the major competitors within the soft drink market. By employing various advertising tactics, strategies such as blind taste tests, and reward initiatives for the consumer, they have grown to become oligopolistic rivals. In the soft-drink business, “The Coca-Cola Company” and “PepsiCo, Incorporated” hold most of the market shares in virtually every region of the world. They have brands that the consumers want, whether it be soft-drink brands or in PepsioCo’s case, snacks. With only one soft-drink market, the two competitors have no choice but to increase sales by stealing the other competitor’s clients. This led to the term, the “cola wars” which was first used

An eyeball assessment of the changes in Coke’s financial statements between 1996 and 2010 show that mainly all accounts are up. The total assets are up from 1996 to 2010 with an increase from $16,161 to $72,921. Also current assets increased 3.6% from 1996 to 2010 with total non-current assets increasing 5%. Revenue nearly doubled from 1996 having only $18,546 to increasing in 2010 to $35,119. The total current liabilities increased over the years from $7,406 to $18,508. The total long term liabilities also show an increase from 1996 having $2,599 to $23,410 in 2010. Also the

PepsiCo is a global food and beverage corporation based in United States. Company received its current name in 1965, through the merger of Pepsi-Cola with Frito Lay Inc. PepsiCo makes, markets, sells and distributes more than 40 brands. A range of worldwide famous brand names includes Pepsi, Mountain Dew, Lay’s, Doritos, Quaker, Tropicana, Tostitos, Walkers, Cheetos, Ruffles, Fritos and others. PepsiCo generated net revenues of more than USD 65 billion in 2013, where 35% of revenue from developing and emerging markets (PepsiCo Annual Report). Pepsi products are available in more than 200 countries. The company has its own bottling manufacture and distribution facilities. Pepsi-Cola Company division is the second largest carbonated soda business in the world and the Frito-Lay division is the world’s leader in snacks business. The Frito-Lay generates more than 65% of PepsiCo 's net sales and more than 2/3 of the PepsiCo operating

Coca-Cola is a leading beverage industry in the United States and many other countries in the world. PepsiCo is also a leading worldwide beverage company, but they are also the parent company of the Frito-Lay and Quaker Oats Companies. This makes PepsiCo a leader in the beverage, snack and cereal industries. As consumers, we have indulged in their products for many years. My personal preference has always been Pepsi over Coke, which is why I was very interested in conducting this analysis. Regardless of the results, I will always seek out a Diet Pepsi over a Diet Coke and so will many of my physician friends at Children’s Hospital who start their mornings with a Diet Pepsi. These personal preferences are what contributes to a company’s profits through net sales. However, the key performance measurement tools used are not based on sales alone. Calculating liquidity, solvency, and profitability ratios on a regular basis give us a better insight on the performance and overall health of a company.

As mention before, Coca-cola has 47.3 percent market share in the country’s cola market versus Pepsi which hold 44.5 percent. Coca-cola is also the brand known around the worlds, which are the largest producer and distributor of ark colas in the world. Even in the current monetary crisis, the company continues to expand and the financial position shows that Coca-cola has a strong cash position in compare to PepsiCo which the long term debt of PepsiCo is so high.

Although PepsiCo’s current assets grew their current liabilities also grew, which leads me to believe that Coca-Cola is more poised to grow as a company in the future. I believe there is room for both of these companies to fix their financial status in these areas. PepsiCo needs to find a way to increase their current assets without raising their current liabilities and Coca-Cola need to find a way to increase their current assets while maintaining their steady drop in current liabilities.

This research paper pinpoints the financial analysis of Pepsi Co, Inc., namely its profitability; liquidity; solvency and operating outcome with respect to its competitors, Coca-Cola Inc., and Dr. Pepper Snapple Group. The upshot of Pepsi’s financial breakdown will assist the soda drink maker to improve its production approach and keep its flagship brand aggressive and competitive.

PepsiCo and Coca-Cola are fierce competitors and according to their financial statements they are both healthy companies. Therefore I would invest in Coca-Cola if I had to make the decision because it has higher income, a stronger long-term debt to networking capital ratio, steadily rising net income per common share, and a climbing and high solvency ratio. PepsiCo still shows healthy growth and outperforms Coca-Cola in many areas. I will conduct a financial analysis of Coca-Cola and PepsiCo to identify their strengths and weaknesses, ultimately deciding which one is worth the investment.

figure is retained earnings of $11,519 million. Contrary to Pepsi’s, Coke’s major assets include: 1. 2. Long-term investments (36.6% of total assets) Current assets (32% of total assets)§