Athens Citizenship Dbq Essay

Citizenship in Athens and Rome has similarities and differences. Being a citizen is being a native or naturalized member of a state or nation who owes allegiance to its government. Being a citizen meant different things in each empire. The relationship between the citizen and their nation varied from their system of citizenship. Rome had a better system of citizenship because they were more open to who they allowed citizenship, they gave people they conquered citizenship, and personal grudges, judgements about others/topics would not affect the Empire.

Citizenship in ancient Greece and Rome were both examples of historically important normative theories. Citizenship in ancient Greece was primarily based off of the writing of Aristotle. In Athens, gender, race, and class defined citizenship completely. Because of this, a large amount of people was excluded. This included children, immigrants, women, and most of all slaves. Citizenship was only given to a minority of people, which presented citizens with high expectations and responsibilities. Most citizens held public office at some point in their life. With short terms and many positions, citizens had an almost equal chance of exercising political power. Aristotle believed citizens must know each other, share values, and have common interest.

To begin with, both of their ways that they chose the officials were similar but also differed. The Athenian Government and the Roman Republic both had the citizens of each side choose the officials, but they both had a difference in limitations on how they chose the officials. In Athens, the citizens would vote for the officials, but the people who were official citizens were the ones who were 18 or over, born in Athens, and had to be males. This means that outsiders, slaves, or women could not vote because they were not considered citizens. Additionally, the Athenian Government system for voting was organized with citizens by the name of demes or demos; who belonged to tribes and where combined with others of the same area to make a larger group, which in turn were combined to form ten tribes. (Gill, thoughtco 2017). In contrast, citizens of Rome had to be over 15 years old, male slaves could also vote if they were granted freedom, the women were considered citizens but had no voting rights. The

Citizenship is the legal status of an individual living within a particular country. Having citizenship gives people rights and responsibilities as well as a sense of belonging to a community. Citizenship can influence the lives of people as it gives people a sense of identity and how to live their life.

For Polybius the advantage of the roman republic over Athenian democracy was that, successively more people shared power as a safeguard against abuse until the immorality of democracy again led to conditions favorable for the receiving of the "Fuehrerpinzip." In his plan, there successively occur three "good" forms of government – kingship, aristocracy, and democracy – only for each to succumb to corruption and for its resulting understanding in its distorted form – respectively dictatorship, oligarchy, and adhocracy, or mob rule – to be overthrown by the kind phase of the next. Polybius also tells us that the senate puts forth its control largely because it has the power to carry out investigations of capital crimes and to offer ultimate negotiation in civil disagreement. There are no rights prior to the state Mixed government implies checks & balances (Polybius, Roman Republic), which implies the good of the entire community.

The Romans were more friendly with their citizenship and they made more friends than enemies and this is better for rome because they have more agriculture and farmers and this is what made Rome better than Athens . The male in Rome

Grabber: Background: Thesis: Rome's system of individual rights and responsibilities lead to a more successful and fair society than Athens’ through equal rights to citizenship, foreigners' inclusion into citizenship, and security from corruption. |||||||||||||||||||||||||| While Athens excludes many peoples from their rights to citizenship, Rome regards the issue with equality. In agreement, Document A relays that adult males are allowed to vote in both Athens and Rome, but Rome includes females, male and female children, and sons of freed slaves (Document A).

The Athenian citizen had a further contribution to the government than Spartans citizens. The Athenian government allowed its citizens to take part in government positions, aside from military positions, as it stated on a textbook, Echoes from the Past that ”Every citizen had an equal chance to hold public office”(Newman, Echoes from the Past, page132). Which signifies that being in the government position means having the capability to rule and not wealth. In the Athenian democracy, each council member and government officials had an

How was Ancient Rome different Ancient Greece? Ancient Rome gave the people more rights than Ancient Greece Difference between Ancient Rome and Ancient Greece poor people? Ancient Greece poor people were not allowed to vote, whereas in Ancient Rome you could vote even if you were poor.

According to US History, “Only free, adult men enjoyed the rights and responsibility of citizenship. Only about 20 percent of the population of Athens were citizens,” (2014). In both systems, if you were not a free male born to that city, you had no say in the government. It is like our democratic system that he had incorporated in our country for the first one hundred years. Also, to the fact that all citizens were required to be on council, it led to a fact that Athens is, “likely to grind to a halt because of a minor disagreement in the citizen’s assembly or senate,”(Failure 2007). However, the Roman Republic voted in members, their system was less likely to fall apart, “ but also meant that the entire state would become more cumbersome when attempting to deal with democracy,” (Failure

Early in Roman society classes were divided by strict customs. However, in order to maintain their power Rome began to change the rules of society. This change allowed the people to move classes therefore gaining more capable men to lead. Throughout the reign of the Roman Empire there were several classes, most notably were the Patricians, Senators, Plebeians, Freemen, and Slaves. (McKay, et al., 2014). Society was based on heredity, property, wealth, citizenship, and freedom.

In ancient Rome, the plebeians had fewer rights than the predictions. Certain people had certain types of citizenship, like Full citizenship, limited citizenship, and no citizenship. The men in ancient Rome had full citizenship. Men could vote, become a senator, and they were protected by the law. In ancient Rome, the Men were considered to be the most important. The women had limited citizenship in ancient Rome. Women could not vote, could not choose who they want to marry, and the women had to stay at home all day and teach children. The slaves in ancient Rome have no citizenship. Slaves could not vote, and they were only freed if they could buy their

When the Romans overthrew the Etruscan kings and abolished the monarchy, they adopted a limited democracy that was similar to the one in Athens. Like in Greece, every free male was considered to be a citizen. However, some people, the patricians in particular, did not like the fact that they and the plebians were equal in terms of privileges and citizenship. Since the patricians had the Senate, the plebians formed the Consilium Plebis. Instead of a limited democracy, Rome became a Republic (Sayre 181).

From this week history reading understanding I think before social classes existed, Rome comprised of people form all different origins and backgrounds, and these demographics allowed for every diverse population. If Rome wanted to be successful as an empire, they would have to accept people from all backgrounds, and by recognizing their own heterogeneous origins it, “allowed the Romans to assimilate other people and unite Italy into a strong federation based on an unusual degree of equality and

Different form Athens, Roman citizens all had rights to understand the government through forum government built; meanwhile, all Roman citizens had rights to vote for their senate and consuls, and then senate and consuls had right to vote for governors, and the whole was ruled through a uniformed law, twelve tablets. As a result, even democracies would have different origins and policies. Because of their differences in their political systems, geographies and their cultures, civilizations in Rome and Greece were also different. Both Rome and Greece had conquered large area of land and countries, it was hard to rule such a large area, so Greece and Rome had their own polices.