Athens Citizenship Dbq

Athens is a city-state in the southern Mediterranean that has had many accomplishments but not many in terms of their citizenship. Rome is a very large, successful, fair city-state in terms of citizenship and other things and it is located in the southern Mediterranean. Citizenship in Athens and Rome: Which was the better system of citizenship? Rome has a better system of citizenship because it had fair rights, it allows more people to become citizens, and it is in a controlled and organized matter.

The first reason why Rome’s citizenship system was better than Athens’ is because they accepted more people as citizens. In document A it shows who could be allowed to become a citizen in both Athens and Rome. Rome allowed all people except slaves to become citizens while Athens only allowed free native born adult males to become citizens. Rome was a lot more lenient when giving citizenship which is probably one reason they boasted a population of 45,000,000.

The most distinctive feature of Greek political culture lay in the extent of popular participation in political life that occurred within the city-states. This participation was based on the unique ideas of “citizenship,” of free people running the affairs of state, and of equality for all citizens before the law. Political participation in Greek city-states was much wider than in Persia, but it varied considerably between city-states and over time. Early in Greek history, only the wealthy and wellborn had the rights of full citizenship, but middle- and lower-class men gradually obtained these rights in some city-states.

Athens had a better government in my opinion. I think Athens had a better government because they created a democracy. According to the Athens and Sparta Document Set, a democracy means “rule by the people”. The Athens also got to abolish politicians they did not like. Athens also had ten generals, meanwhile, Sparta has two kings. In my opinion, I think that having ten generals is better than two kings because they understand you more. Sadly not all Ancient Athens were citizens, but if a free male would be a citizen if his father was a citizen of Athens. Later on, they changed that law, it was then bothering the father and mother had to be a citizen for the child to be considered a citizen. Sadly the women didn’t get that many rights but they soon they got more status. The Athens also made it to where not only the wealthy can engage in the jury service. In the Athens, you have to be an 18-year-old man to complete military training. On the other hand, in Sparta, you have to be a 30-year-old to complete military training. Basically, I’m trying to say that the Athens had a better

In the past week I have read different documents about the Ancient Athens and whether or not it was a true democracy. To sum up all the documents my hypothesis was true. I believed they weren't a true democracy. Athens wasn’t a true Democracy because Demokratia was ruled by male citizens only which made up 12% of the population. Women, slaves, and foreigners weren't allowed to vote.

Citizenship is a status or standing given by government to it's people It was first thought of in ancient times by Athens. Athens was a city-state part of the peninsula Greece. This whole transition to citizenship instead of subjects was thought to begin at around 500 BCE, but Athens wasn't the only one participating in this new ideology. Rome, of the Italian peninsula, decided that citizenship was a good way to make their subjects feel proud of their home, so both civilizations started using these new principles. But which citizenship system was better Rome or Athens.

Are you a citizen? Maybe you are. Maybe you aren’t. A citizen is a legally recognized subject. Citizenship is a status given by the government. Rome and Athens had very different systems of citizenship. But which system, Athens’ or Rome’s, was better? Some say it was Rome.

Grabber: Background: Thesis: Rome's system of individual rights and responsibilities lead to a more successful and fair society than Athens’ through equal rights to citizenship, foreigners' inclusion into citizenship, and security from corruption. |||||||||||||||||||||||||| While Athens excludes many peoples from their rights to citizenship, Rome regards the issue with equality. In agreement, Document A relays that adult males are allowed to vote in both Athens and Rome, but Rome includes females, male and female children, and sons of freed slaves (Document A).

Only men could be citizens. To be a citizen, you had to not only be a man, but also be financially secure as well as you had to be born in Athens and so did both of your parents. Women were forbidden to be citizens, along with slaves, foreigners and children, or anyone else who did not meet the proper criteria. To be a citizen meant you had the right to vote, since Athens was a democratic society. However a woman not being able to vote does not make Athens a true democratic society. Sadly this was not the only right women did not have.

The Athenian citizen had a further contribution to the government than Spartans citizens. The Athenian government allowed its citizens to take part in government positions, aside from military positions, as it stated on a textbook, Echoes from the Past that ”Every citizen had an equal chance to hold public office”(Newman, Echoes from the Past, page132). Which signifies that being in the government position means having the capability to rule and not wealth. In the Athenian democracy, each council member and government officials had an

The freedom which we enjoy in our government extends also to our ordinary life” (Pericles’ Funeral Oration, Thucydides). In other words, it doesn’t matter what your social rank is, if you are a citizen of Athens, you have a right (and duty) to serve in the government. This is known as a direct democracy today, and it is where we, citizens of the United States, took inspiration for our current system of government. Pericles is right to praise the city-state in this regard, as its legacy still has effect on the world millenniums after its time.

After the wars, Athens emerges as the center of all activity amongst each city-state in Greece. One of the key features within the Athenian society was the arrangement of public assembly and the rule of the people, democracy. In the assemblies, any male citizen could actively vote

According to me people in Athens and Sparta obtain the right to participate in public life and make decisions affecting the community it because of the political realm that it is made to modernize and civilization owes much to Athens, and further to the democracy which was born in it and also Athens participate in the way people who govern them by helping as public officers or member of jury in court cases. Jurors were chosen by lottery and were paid for service.

The Greek Society was divided between free people and slaves, which were owned by the free people. The slaves’ job was to be servants and laborers to the free people. They had no legal rights. The slaves were gained from either being prisoners of war or by being bought from foreign slave traders. As time progressed on, free men were divided into Citizens and Metics. A citizen was one who was born with Athenian parents, who were believed to be the most powerful groups among Greeks. The Citizens were able to take part in the government. A metic was one who was of foreign birth then had later migrated to Athens. Metics had to pay taxes, and they were sometimes required to serve in the army. However, Metics could never acquire the full rights of a Citizen.

In summary, Athens was structured as a direct democracy for Athenian citizens, who consisted of free, adult males born of Athenian parents. Citizenship determined the right to participate in public life and make decisions affecting the community. Accordingly, these rights were held only by a minority of the overall Athenian population. It is estimated that Athens in the 4th century BCE had a total population of around 260,000 people, of whom only 40,000 (15%) could participate in