In the passage “Athens and Sparta,” Mr. Duckworth states “Where they differed was that while Sparta had militaristic values, Athenians were democratic.” Athens and Sparta were two major city-states in Ancient Greece. Both city-states would have been decent places to live. However, Sparta would have been a better city-state to live in than Athens because Spartan women had more independence that other women in Greece, Sparta had a strong army, and Sparta was selfless.
Sparta had a strong army. In the text, Mr Duckworth explicitly states “Sparta had a powerful army, and Athens knew they could not beat them…” In other words, Sparta was so powerful that Athens could not defeat them. To add on, Sparta was a militaristic society, and Spartans began training at the age of seven. Therefore, Sparta had a skilled army.
To state another argument, Sparta was selfless. In the passage, Duckworth states “Sparta was content to keep to itself and provide army and assistance when necessary to other city-states.” Even though it was not required of them, Sparta offered help to other city-states.
…show more content…
Athens was a democracy. Mr. Duckworth informs “Athens is said to have been the birthplace of democracy.” Democracy means “rule by the people.” The people discussed, voted on, and made decisions on matters. Notwithstanding, the people who would prefer to live in Athens are mistaken. In Sparta, women were more powerful than several other women in the ancient world. Mr. Duckworth explains “In Sparta, women had rights that other Greek women did not have.” In Athens, the government was not controlled by all people. The government was controlled by free male natives. On the other hand, in Sparta, women were privileged with many rights in comparison to other Greek women. For instance, women could own property and develop friendships with men of their choice. All in all, Spartan women enjoyed many more rights than Athenian
Source R is of … The main role of their army was to protect Sparta’s borders from both other city-states and in revolts. Sparta’s whole way of life, their militaristic society and the State’s constitution all revolve around its army. As time went on, Sparta developed into the leading military force in ancient Greece and they believed that they had the ‘best army in the world’ at the end of the Peloponnesian War and upheld this status for over a quarter of a century.
The city-states Athens and Sparta were rivals in ancient Greece. Geographically the two were very close to each other, but they had a very different economy, cultural values, and way of governing. Both city-states had two very different ways of doing things. I will be highlighting the major differences.
Athens weren’t a democracy because they didn’t allow citizen women, foreigners, or slaves to vote. Athens didn’t allow people to think differently or they'd be killed or sent away. Many people had barely any rights because they were either slaves, women, or people who weren't born in a Athens couldn’t participate
In the article Athens and Sparta by Mr.Duckworth states,”Sparta had a powerful army and Athens knew that they couldn’t beat them. ”This is a good aspect because it would keep Sparta safe from intruders. In the text it states,”In Sparta women had more
In, “Athens and Sparta” by Mr.Duckworth the author states “while Spartan had militaristic values athenian where democratic.” Sparta would have been a better place to live because spartan women had more freedom than other greek women,they could own their own property and where free of chores.
Athens and Sparta are the two famous city-states in Ancient Greece. The Athens was more superior then Sparta. The Athenians were stronger because they had a better geography, government, cultural achievements, and I would rather live in the Athens.
The government in Sparta followed a very different coarse than that of the Athenians. It was controlled by an oligarchy in which the power was held by a group of five men called ephors. Working below the ephors was the Council of Elders and an Assembly. Male citizens over age sixty could serve on the Council while anyone, male or female, over the age of twenty could be a member of the Assembly. Though the citizens had little say in the decisions made by the government, the system worked effectively. Over the years, the Spartan's brutal reputation in war grew so great that other nations and city-states were too frightened to attack Sparta even though the Spartan army was no larger then eight thousand men. The Spartan Constitution called for all men to begin their military education at the age of seven, where they were trained to be tough and self-sufficient. Every man in the army fought with a great deal of passion for his country. Life in Sparta may have been rough, but the rest of the Greeks envied the Spartans for their simplicity, straight forwardness, and fanatical dedication. The beliefs of Sparta were oriented around the state. The individual lived and died for the state. The combination of this philosophy, the education of Spartan males, and the discipline of their army gave the Spartans the stability needed to survive in Ancient Greece.
“Where the differed was that while the Spartans had militaristic values, Athenians were democratic,”states Mr.Duckworth in “Athens and sparta”.
Mr.Duckworth states, “ Unlike Sparta, in Athens, boys were not forced to join the army.” In Sparta boys were sent to the Agoge away from their mothers. This proves that Athens would have been a better place to live in because in Athens boys were not forced to join the army, and that boys in Athens were not sent to the Agoge away from their families like spartan
Sparta was, above all, a military state, and emphasis on military fitness began at birth, imprinted through society and the political system. The education of the Spartan male children prove that the military and war was constantly a huge part of Spartan society, and the laws and systems that Sparta was governed by, only enforced the militaristic attitude into the society of Sparta. That the Spartans needed to be ready for war is proved by the discord between the Spartiate and the helots, who outnumbered and under ranked the Spartans.
Sparta was ruled by a king or at some point two kings. These two kings were from two separate families of royalty and neither of them had absolute power. The king or kings had to be consulted by the Ephors. The Ephors had a lot of power and authority in the Spartan government. They were a group of five elders, men over the age of 30 who would serve in this position for a year. They had the power to bring up charges against anyone in Sparta, including the king. Unlike Athens who was set on trying to establish a peaceful democratic atmosphere; Sparta was a lot more militaristic and strict. One of the Spartan government’s main priorities was the strength of the Spartan army. They believed that strength, endurance and numbers were a key part in a successful and powerful army. Therefore every Spartan boy at the age of seven would be taken away from their mothers and put into training for the next 13 years.
Athens was a much more superior polis compared to Sparta because the Athenians invented new ideas and creations that supported the people, such as democracy, the Athenians led the Delian League, and Sparta created the Peloponnesian League after the Athenians created their alliance, and the Athenians changed the ways of their government many times to suit the people, and the Spartans did not.
“No man ever proves himself a good man in war unless he can endure to face the blood and the slaughter, go against the enemy and fight with his hands.” The preceding was quoted from “The Spartan creed” by the poet Tyrtaeus. There are two authors in this primary resource reading which include Tyrtaeus as well as Xenophon, whom authored “The laws and customs of the Spartans”. These two works give great detail to the Spartan society. As history has presented it, Sparta was a smaller polis and yet was one of the most, if not most, influential societies in history. What we know of this culture comes to us from excavation of its
The ancient civilization of Greece contained many different city-states; two of these city-states were Sparta and Athens. Sparta and Athens were different in their values, politics, and societies. Sparta was focused on their military, discipline, and to have a strong state. Athens was a democratic state that was peaceful and where women were open to culture and democracy. How do these two city-states differ?
The Athenian people had a very modernized and an opened outlook towards life. In contrast to Sparta, in Athens, males were not obliged to join the armed forces they had the opportunity to pursue a good education and distinct varieties of arts and sciences courses. The people of Sparta were not open to other forms of education they only focused on military obedience and power. They didn’t also associate with people outside their territories. Family ties in Athens however, were much stronger. Women were officially dependents of their spouses or their fathers. Women in Athens had no right to own an asset apart from their family. In Sparta, women enjoyed more privileges than women in the other Greek countries did. Women in Sparta were stronger and they formed close relations with their men as they chose. Women could also possess their own assets. In the Athenian region females worked on house chores such as cooking or weaving but in Sparta, the females were free of all of such chores. (Differ,