Attracting Foreign Direct Investment ( Fdi ) Essay

Global Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) fell by 18 per cent to $1.3 trillion in 2012. This decline was in sharp contrast to other key economic indicators like GDP and unemployment registered positive growth at the global level (United Nations, 2013). The economic fragility and policy uncertainty in a number of economies has caused a domino effect causing concern among investors. However, FDI flows to developing countries prove to be more resilient than flows to developed countries, recording their second

FDI allows the home country to invest into the host country to produce, advertise, and distribute products, in order to upsurge their market share and provides a long-term investment and enhancement. (Moosa, 2002)

The research this material accounts for mainly focuses on the pros and cons of FDI regarding corporations more than host countries, like what are the factors that attract multinational’s investment, what are the risk of expropriation, the extent of the development of stock markets, and what is the linkage between democracy and foreign investment (Bekaert, Harvey, & Lundblad, 2011; Busse & Hefeker, 2007; Eichengreen et al., 2011; Li, 2009). Indeed, this specific research tells little about the host countries in this international flux of investment rather than distinguishing between developed and less-developed countries (LDCs).

The most important channel through which foreign capital flows into the country is Foreign Direct Investment (FDI). FDI as defined in Dictionary of Economics (Graham Bannock et.al) is “investment in a foreign country through the acquisition of a local company or the establishment there of an operation on a new (Greenfield) site. International Monetary Organization (IMF) and Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) define FDI as a category of cross border investment made by a resident in one economy (the direct investor) with the objective of establishing a ‘lasting interest’ in an enterprise (the direct investment enterprise) that is resident in an economy other than that of the direct investor. The motive of the direct

“Let’s talk about Investment from one country into another normally by companies rather than governments that involve establishing operations or acquiring tangible assets, including stakes in other businesses. Foreign direct investment is well-known from group of foreign investment by the factor of control. FDI is a transfer of ownership; it usually involves the transfer of factors matching to capital, including management, technology and organizational skills. (D. A. MacDougall G. 1960.). Businesses that make foreign direct investments are often called multinational corporations may make a direct investment by creating a new foreign enterprise, or by the acquisition of a foreign firm. In the framework of foreign direct investment, advantages and disadvantages are one way or another kind of perspective. A Foreign

An FDI may provide some great advantages for the MNE but not for the foreign country where the investment is made. On the other hand, sometimes the deal can work out better for the foreign country depending upon how the investment pans out. Ideally, there should be numerous advantages for both the MNE and the foreign country, which is often a developing country. We'll examine the advantages and disadvantages from both perspectives, starting with the advantages for multinational enterprises (MNES).

One of the primary benefits of foreign direct investment is that it helps the developing country. When a large corporation pours millions or billions of dollars into building part of its business in that country, it can significantly stimulate the local economy. This helps other businesses in the surrounding

Foreign direct investment (FDI) is taken as one of the key factor of rapid economic growth and development. FDI, it is believed to stimulate domestic investment, human capital, and transfers technology. It is associated qualities which causes the faster economic development in the host countries. South Korea, for instance had one of the of the poorest economies during 1960s, but yet

Developing countries are stuck in a cycle of poverty that can’t be broken from within the domestic economy due to an insufficient supply of investment available in these countries to raise the productivity and income levels of workers. The only way to break the cycle of poverty is through investment from multinational corporations. FDI is an

Foreign direct investment plays a critical role in financing the development of emerging economies. Foreign direct investment benefits countries through a transfer of resources in the form of capital, technology, management of resources, creation of work opportunities, and a positive impact on the country’s balance sheet, typically through an increase in export volumes. These benefits are essential for sustainable growth and development of a country, especially for developing countries. Despite the important role that foreign direct investment plays in helping to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals, many developing countries face challenges in accessing this source.

The objective of this paper is to analyze the effectiveness of foreign aid flows to certain sectors in attracting FDI. This is done from both a theoretical and an empirical point of view, starting from the broad focus of comparing physical capital and complementary factors of production and then narrowing the focus to economic and social aid. The main

There is a long standing belief that foreign direct investment (FDI) inflows help the countries to have the opportunity to make further improvements on their economies. In recent decade, this belief strengthened by the fact that faster growing economies tend to attract more FDIs. Even if the direction of causality between FDI and growth is not absolute yet, positive impacts of FDI such as new technology, know-how or creating employment are enough attractive for policymakers. Consequently, investigating factors that pull FDI into country became a crucial topic in the literature.

FDI plays in the economic growth process of the host country. A good number of the studies and discussions show that there exists a strong correlation between FDI and economic progression. In addition to being an engine for diffusion of knowledge and transfer of technology, FDI also stimulates international trade, domestic investment, expands host nation 's domestic savings, and increases the host country 's foreign exchange reserves adjusting its Balance of Payment post. These factors increase the economic growth of the host nation.

Central and Eastern European countries offer appealing circumstances, such as lower labour costs together with a well-educated labour pool. Therefore, these countries compete with each other for obtaining higher foreign direct investments. More than that, the fiscal system has become extremely supportive in the majority of these countries. As a result, foreign investors began to open new branches in these regions (Birsan, Buiga,2008).

Almost all of the countries are trying to attract FDI, as inward FDI could bring host countries a number