Attractiveness As A Long Term Romantic Partner

In people’s perspective, attractiveness possess a wide variety of positive personal qualities compared to unattractive people. Result from the study on physical attractiveness stereotypes show the attractive people had the most positive ratings. For example, they are judged as less disturbed, rated as happier and more successful, and more likely to be hired after a job interview. Thus, the concept of attractiveness having a correlation between an individual’s physical appearance and his/her achievements, abilities, psychological well-being and/or other status characteristics to create a perception is

In a study carried out by Byrne (1971) found that strangers with similar attitudes to participants were rated as being more physically attractive in comparison to participants which had dissimilar attitudes.

I found it interesting that the authors found that actual similarity did not predict romantic attraction, that in fact similarity was significantly or marginally related to romantic liking for 6 of the 26 results were in the expected direction. They also found that significant effect of socio-sexuality similarity on liking, and socio-sexuality shares some conceptual overlap with extraversion.

This essay aims to show a comparison between the differences between both female short-term mating strategies and female long-term mating strategies. It will explore the evolution of psychology that has shown reasons for human mating and how these reasons go above and beyond the general idea of physical attractiveness and love. This essay will identify how mate preferences have evolved and further identify psychological mechanisms that women have used to select their mates over the past. This essay will compare and critically discuss the differences and outline them between female short-term mating strategies and female long-term mating

This article argues that physical attractiveness is a gateway for a healthy relationship. Singles, of both sex, recognizes the importance of physical attractiveness, especially online. Only when the standard is meet would they investigate further into the personality. It also argues that excessive attractiveness is unnecessary, and people prefers “averagely” attractive partner. The author is a dating & mating psychologist, has deep study in relationships. I will use this article as a major point to support my thesis statement.

Past research has demonstrated that there exists a connection between smiling and physical attractiveness. A smiling person was perceived as more intelligent and could create in the perceiver a warmer feeling than a nonsmiling person. This study evaluates whether smiling vs. not smiling and rater’s gender have an effect on attractiveness ratings of a male and a female dating profile. Furthermore, it predicts that there will be a main effect of smiling on the ratings of both, male and female dating profiles. Moreover, it also predicts that there will be an interaction of rater’s gender and smiling for the female profile. However, the results did not support this statement, there was not a main effect of rater’s gender on any of the dating profiles. Both profiles male and female, were better rated when the person was smiling. Indicating that people prefer smiling over the non-smiling faces. On the other hand, no interaction was observed between rater’s genders and smiling for male and female profile.

When the adolescents were rating the different characteristics the results were as followed, boys rated attractiveness higher than the girls and social status wasn’t important to either group. In the vignette portion of the research, when the social status and the attractiveness were displayed on pictures, it showed that both groups found attractiveness important. Social status was only important for the boys when the mate was attractive and the girls found social status was important whether attractive or not. Lastly, as stated by Ha (2009) “self-perceived mate value moderated the relationship between attractiveness and dating desire for both boys and girls.” Also stated be Ha (2009) “adolescents who perceived themselves as having high mate value showed more dating desire if the other person was attractive compared to adolescents who perceived themselves as having a lower mate value.”

Generally as the average rating decreased the standard deviation for the ratings increased. Some of the facial ratios measured were either much higher or lower than the golden ratio. The ratios for a/g and b/d were closest to the golden ratio. The greatest variability was seen for the ratio of the tip of the nose to the lips to the width of the lips (standard deviation for 0.87) The second greatest variability was the ratio of the pupil to the lip to the top of the head to the pupil. Interestingly when all the faces measurements were averaged together we could see that all the faces are close to the golden ratio. We next examined the correlations between the absolute difference between phi and the measured ratio (delta phi) and the average attractiveness rating. No significant correlations were seen except for the b/d ratio. Interestingly, as the ratio went farther from the golden ratio the higher the faces were ranked (Spearman’s correlation r = 0.58, p =

Once participants give informed consent they will be asked to take a seat. They will then be given a survey and asked to inform the researcher once they have completed the questionnaire. Once they have completed the survey they will be given 6 dating profiles and a survey to accompany the profiles. The profiles will be of 6 different people of different genders and gender expressions. There will be a profile of a feminine woman, an androgynous woman, and a masculine woman. There will also be a profile of a feminine man, an androgynous man, and a masculine man. The questionnaire that accompanies these dating profiles will ask the participant to answer whether or not they find the person in the profile attractive, whether or not they find themselves attracted to the person in the profile, and whether or not they would go on a date with the person in the profile . Once the participant completes the study they will be verbally debriefed and given a debriefing form that will contain general information regarding the study, as well as resources available to them if they experience any discomfort. The participants will be given 30 minutes of research credit for their participation and thanked for their

Target-irrelevant ability increased attractiveness only as a male romantic partner (Prediction 2). Same as in Experiment 1, these results possibly suggest that people have relaxed standard for ability of friends and female mates to offer resources when willingness to offer such benefits is properly controlled for. If so, this null effect of ability on friend choice and men’s mate choice is consistent with Prediction 4 and 5. Moreover, both men and women can downplay the information value of target-irrelevant ability when target-specific willingness is already known (the same logic behind Prediction 3 that willingness will have a stronger influence on attractiveness of a partner). However, in women’s mate choice where stake size is large (the largest of the four types of partner choice covered in this paper), it is reasonable for women to be deliberate and demanding in choosing a mate. This might be the reason why women took target-irrelevant ability into consideration even though target-specific willingness was already

Biologists believed that facial symmetry should be attractive because it may signal mate quality. Rhodes, Proffit, Grady and Sumich (1998) manipulated the symmetry to figure out the effect on attractiveness. 4 versions of a picture were created. One was perfectly symmetric, the others were a highly symmetric version, normal level of symmetry and a low symmetric version.64 subjects rated these faces. The results clearly stated that perfect symmetry was significantly more attractive and low symmetry faces were unattractive, more over the males found the perfect symmetric faces more appealing as potential life partners, so facial symmetry does play a role in mate selection. In the second experiment the authors compared the attractiveness of faces at three symmetry levels. These were normal, high and perfect. The subjects were shown two versions of the same face at different

The research findings showed that a man’s sexual attraction to a woman was increased by young women associated with red, but it was not increased by older women with red. It also revealed that the older participants found the two age groups of women equal in their sexual attraction, while the younger participants did not find the older women, as sexually attractive as the younger women. The color red did not affect physical attractiveness, intellect, and empathy. In addition, the article greatly contributed to the theories of social psychology. In Exploring Psychology in Modules, the author discusses physical attractiveness. He discusses how among different cultures, men are attracted to women through signs of the body. These signs indicate fertility, which makes the man more attracted to a woman. This understanding may help to show why both age groups of men were equally attracted to the younger women in the pictures, as opposed to the older women, where only the older men found them equally attractive to the younger women (Schwarz & Singer,

When we initially meet somebody, regularly the new associate rapidly makes an impression. That initial introduction can have enduring impacts. How quick do we make these underlying impressions of others? In one study, judgments made after only a 100-millisecond introduction time to new faces was adequate for people to shape an impression. Various studies have found that prompt impressions can be exact. In light of almost no confirmation, for example, that gave by photos, exceptionally concise cooperations, or video cuts, people can precisely distinguish a man 's sentimental enthusiasm for them propensity to be, and sexual introduction. Albeit initial introductions may add to whether a relationship will create, obviously there is significantly more required in whether a relationship will persevere. Nature may breed scorn, as the well-known axiom goes, yet analysts have found that commonality is a critical condition for a cozy relationship to create. Generally, companions and mates are individuals who have been around each other for quite a while; they may have grown up together, gone to secondary school or school together, cooperated, or gone to the same get-togethers. Another well-known axiom, "Similar people are attracted to eachother," additionally clarifies fascination. By and large, our companions and partners are significantly more like us than dissimilar to us. Companions and beaus have a tendency to have comparable states of mind, qualities, ways of life, and physical

Overall people perceived as beautiful have more job opportunities as well as a higher chance for advancement in their carriers. A study was conducted by the University of North Carolina at Pembroke on the topic of the relationship between attractiveness of professors and the perceived quality of their teaching. What the study found out was a strong relationship between the two – “results indicated that as hotness ratings increased, so did ratings on overall quality, clarity, and helpfulness. Additionally, further analysis indicated that the greater the percentage of hotness ratings to overall ratings, the more likely that students rated the professors favorably.” Moreover research shows that attractive people perform better when interviewed. An interesting fact is

A few relationships tend to be based solely on their partner’s level of attractiveness. We determine how attractive someone is, “ the prejudice of deciding what to do based solely on outward appearance could cost the pursuer the chance of a meaningful relationship” (Modern Day Adages). Although someone is “better” looking doesn’t mean anything when it comes to their character and personality. An “average” person can be more beautiful on the inside than a “better” looking person. As a society, we need to give others the opportunity to show themselves even if they’re “average.”