Auditor Independence Is Defined By Mautz And Sharaf

In the world of business, it is so obvious that Certified Public Accountants are playing an extremely important role to the public. Working as Certified Public Accountants, it is so special that they provide accounting professional services not to a specific person but to the whole public. Therefore, the ethics and conducts of the Certified Public Accountants becomes much more important because it affects the reasonable operation and successful development of the whole industry. So, as a professional accountant, we need take the duties that required by the AICPA code of ethics --- “professional competence, confidentiality, integrity, and objectivity".

Accountants and their practices have traditionally been held to very high standards. The most recent publication of the AICPA’s Code of Professional Conduct defines a key position as,

The audit of financial statements is mandatory for publically listed entities throughout the world. The auditor conducts various tests and based on the results forms an opinion on the truthfulness and fairness of the financial statements of the company and whether or not they are prepared in accordance with the financial reporting standards and are free from any material misstatement (Freedman, 2013). The purpose of auditing is to enhance the confidence of investors and to add credibility to the truthfulness of company 's true financial performance. However, there are some dos ' and don 'ts that an auditor must take care of. For instance, anything that threatens the independence of the auditor must be avoided as it adversely affects the truthfulness and objectivity of the opinion formed.

If You Need Love, Get a Puppy: A Case Study on Professional Skepticism and Auditor Independence

AICPA Code of Professional Conduct is the code of conduct that required each member of the organization to follow rigorously and act with integrity, objectivity, due care, competence, fully disclose any conflicts of interest (and obtain client consent if a conflict exists), maintain client confidentiality, disclose to the client any commission or referral fees, and serve the public interest when providing financial services. Accountants are relied upon to be trustworthy and maintain high ethical standards. It is because of the nature of the profession that puts them in a position of trust with people who rely on their professional judgment and guidance in making decisions. These decisions are extremely important in accounting

Accountants and auditors are often faced with having to make decisions that bring ethics into question. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) sets the standards for professional conduct that dictates what accountants are allowed to do and what they are not allowed to do. However, issues do arise that have not been addressed by the AICPA and when this occurs it is up to management to use their best judgment to make a determination about the ethical implications of their actions (Allen, 2011).

An auditor’s role in an audit is very important. An auditor must be able to collect enough evidence to supports their finding, and also be on the lookout for fraud. Company’s may or may not know the law, but it is the job to know the law, and be able to educate and report findings properly. Since the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, there have been provisions that have directly affected auditors. This paper will include the details of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, how ethics and independence have affected auditors, as well implementation of new standards based on the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

If the auditors of today followed the same rules they did in Great Britain during the 19th century, then America would be in trouble. With such a competitive and strong capitalistic market, it would be hard to not be tempted to alter the financial statements of publically traded companies if there were no independence standards. Today’s business world obviously holds independence of auditors to be important or else Michael Goodbread would have never been investigated by the SEC.

In the wake of accounting malpractices across several companies in the United States such as Enrol Corporation, Tyco International and WorldCom, there has been a lot of attention with regards to the accounting practices in the corporate sector. Specifically, the Sarbanes – Oxley Act (SOX) which was passed by congress in 2002, was aimed at addressing the situation by regulating fraudulent accounting practices such as bribery and wrong entries in books (Williams & Elson, 2010). While regulation has its own limits, it is hoped that ethical principles can go a long way in keeping accountants in check. To this end, a number of institutions formulated within the accounting professions such as the AICPA have come up with codes of conduct to guide the action of members and ensure that they act in a way that is morally right and in line with the profession.

Ethics in any industry is important, but for Accounting professionals and those in need of their services, it is a particularly stressed element. Information provided by accountants is used to make major decisions, including investing, downsizing, expanding, etc, so accountants are expected to be competent, reliable, and have a high degree of professional integrity. Because of these high expectations, the professional accountancy industry, like many other professions, has adopted professional codes of ethics (Woelfel, 1986). These ethical codes go above and beyond the requirements for state or federal laws and regulations. There are several professional organizations within the

There are numerous threats to the independence of auditors which have been identified in the multiple studies and discussions both in Australia (such as the Ramsay report, CLERP 9 Paper) and internationally by IFAC, the European Commission

The conduct of chartered accountants in the UK is governed by the Code of Ethics. The latest revision of these ethics took place January 1, 2011. The fundamental rules that govern the work of these accountants are as follows and similar to those in the US:

According to ICAEW, auditor independence mainly refers to the independence of the external auditor from parties that have an interest in the financial statements of the business being audited. It requires having both integrity and an objective manner to the auditing process. In order for the concept to be deemed effective the auditor needs to carry out their work freely. One of the main purposes of auditing is to increase credibility of the entity’s’ financial statements, as they have expressed their own professional opinion on the truth and fair view in accordance with the proper accounting standards used. This is only possible if the audit is made with reasonable assurance that it has come from an independent source and has not been influenced by other parties, such as managers, directors or by conflict of interest.

Since reliable financial information is essential for investors and other stakeholders to take adequate decisions, this reliability must be backed by independent review performed by independent and certified auditing firms, which are supposed to verify and certify financial statements issued by a company’s management. If the auditor is not competent and independent from management, the audit of the financial statements loses its credibility (Schelker, 2013, p.295). According to Impastato (2003), because of audit failures, accountants are to blame for investors losing billions of dollars in earnings in addition to market capitalization (as cited in Grubbs & Ethridge 2007).

The lack of independence for external auditors will lead to the neglect of auditing risks (William R.K., 2003), which are the main reasons for the failure of certified accountants and professional accounting organizations. The consequence of the external auditors deprived of independence would be very serious. And there are many cases, which aroused by the failure of external auditors and most are related to the lack of independence. One famous example is the bankruptcy of Enron and the role played by its external auditor, Arthur Andersen (Todd, S., 2003). Arthur Andersen was once one of the biggest accounting companies in the world, and was canceled for the involvement in the Enron bankruptcy scandal.