Audrie & Daisy—A Documentary Analysis In the riveting documentary Audrie & Daisy, husband and wife director team Bonnie Cohen and Jon Shenk retrace the events leading up to the harrowing sexual assaults of three teenage girls; Audrie Pott, Daisy Coleman, and Paige Parkhurst, and expose the agonizing after effects and exploitation of the assaults. Subsequent interviews with family members, friends and law enforcement officials give important details about the aftermath of the events, and introduce viewers to possibly the biggest villain of all, Sherriff Darren White of Maryville, Missouri. Throughout the documentary White appears smug when he states that “as County Sheriff, “the buck stops here” (White), and when asked about the crimes …show more content…
and John R., carry her to a room upstairs, secluding her from the party below. They strip her, graffiti her body with salacious comments using indelible marker, and sexually assault her while others digitally document the incursion. Having no recollection of the events that have taken place, Audrie begins investigating her own assault through social media and Facebook messaging, discovering not only the details of her assault, but the appalling things that are being said about her. Conflicted and feeling incapable of escaping the onslaught, she relays to her abusers that “I now have a reputation I cannot get rid of” (Pott) and “my life is over” (Pott) before tragically committing suicide eight days after her assault. During juvenile court proceedings, three teenage boys admit to sexually assaulting Audrie and possessing photos of the assault--both felonies. As a result, two of the boys are sentenced to thirty days in juvenile detention to be served on weekends, and the other receives a sentence to serve forty-five consecutive days in juvenile detention. Because the assailants are considered minors at the time of the crime, they are not publicly identified, and their convictions remain concealed. Sadly, a separate but similar case involving fourteen-year-old Daisy Coleman, and thirteen-year-old Paige Parkhurst proves to divide the small, close knit community of Maryville, Missouri as
Leah Dubuc was only 12 when she was charged with criminal sexual conduct in first and second degree. Author Sarah Stillman in her article, “The List”, explained that juveniles are getting accused of sexual crimes as young as nine and are put into these public registries humiliating them for life. These teens haven’t reached the age which they were aware. Not only Children shouldn’t be accused of crimes that they didn’t even know existed but also when kids are put on these lists they are exposed to:
In the case of the people verse Smith, the juvenile expungement record was of crucial importance relating to the facts of sparing him from the severe punishment proceedings of adult court. The juvenile justice systems appeared to be less inflicting of the intended punishment for Smith’s offense of breaking and entering and designed more of a sentence that would correct or counteract the sentencing of the adult system which is the idea of keeping juvenile proceedings and records private. These legal barriers exist to deal with difficult situations and restrict the sharing of information on juvenile offenders between and among agencies, law enforcement files that are permissible in a court of law under certain circumstances. The court and agencies
In Queensland, up until the age of 17, people in society are considered to be ‘juveniles’ in the eyes of the law. When a crime is committed by a juvenile, the laws are slightly different and carry different charges and sentences. The technicalities surrounding this can be contentious and in some cases it might be argued that there are issues with the way juveniles are treated in law. One issue with how the Queensland Criminal Justice System deals with juvenile offenders is the age at which Juveniles are considered ‘adult offenders’ and no longer ‘juvenile offenders’, as well as the transition from a Youth Detention Centre to an Adult Correctional Centre that a juvenile
after being charged with the rape and beating of a twenty eight year old woman who was jogging in Central Park in New York around 1989. They were interrogated using the Reid technique, all being minors, with no legal counsel present, and after being held for thirty hours in a small, and dim interrogation room. Pressured, intimidated, and exhausted the young teens confessed and were found guilty sentence to forty-one years in prison for a crime they did not commit. Victims or racial conflicts in the 1990 law enforcement, judges, and jury were fast to sentence them and jailed without any proper evidence allowed in the hearing. They were sentenced as adults, being adolescent, becoming nervous by being in jail, and intimidated by police; they
In the past, children who were apprehended for committing crimes, were tried in the same courts as adults. Furthermore, when the children were found guilty, they were given the same punishments as the adults (Austin, Johnson & Gregoriou, 2000). Today, a separate justice system exists for children who commit crimes. The concept of a distinct justice system and treatment for juveniles has come under attack in recent years because communities across the nation began to experience dramatically increased rates of juvenile crime. The increasing incidence and severity of crimes committed by juveniles led many to question the efficacy of the juvenile court system and to call for a harsher response to juvenile crime. This has led to more juvenile arrests,
When reading the article “Juveniles accused in bullying death of 12-year-old should be charged as adults, criminal attorney John Contini describes the case of two juvenile girls of age 12 and 14 being eligible to be charged as adults despite their
Across the US, juveniles are tried as adults when they perpetrate felonies such as violent offense or rape. Juveniles mainly serve a couple of decades in prison or even have received death penalties. Kids are convicted of greater punishment because the greater the crime, the more likely they are called adults. Although youths get charged as adults “a fifteen-year-old youth was mimicking a TV program about little girls who rob a bank and was given a 26-years-to-life prison term. Thomas Preciado was fourteen when he stabbed to death a mini-mart clerk” (Lundstrom). These guidelines must not be applied to kids because they may be pressured or threatened by a character. The punishment should be reduced to a couple of years, after all, it is
The issue of whether juveniles should be prosecuted like adults is a controversial one. Today, a high percent of juvenile offenders have a past criminal history or have been arrested for violent crimes such as rape, robbery, aggravated assault, and homicide. These offenses are serious and should be dealt with seriously. If a juvenile choses to act in violence and currently been on probation for such acts, then perhaps, they should be treated in the adult court. If the juvenile is, a repeat offender and they did not learn anything from the rehabilitation facilities provided by the state, harsh consequences should follow. It is estimated that seventy-five percent of adolescents who spent time in juvenile detention centers are incarcerated
On the other hand, juveniles adjudicated in the juveniles proceedings must be freed at the age of 21, be rehabilitated in a juvenile facility and their juvenile records could be expunged. On top of this, research indicates that juveniles incarcerated and criminally prosecuted in adult facilities have similar or higher rates of recidivism. Other studies have showed that juveniles incarcerated in adult institutions are five times more likely to be assaulted sexually, twice likely to be physically beaten by the members of staff, and 50% likely to beaten with weapons than their juvenile counterparts (Bishop,
Every state has special courts which deal with minors who have violated a criminal statue. Due to their young age, instead of being charged with crime, juveniles are accused of having committed a delinquent act. Juvenile courts have legal authorities over the offender for a specific time period until when the offender becomes an adult, though they might be held for much longer periods. The adult age referred in this case is 18 years (Driver & Brank, 2009).
These juvenile offenders each had at least two felonies on their criminal records, and most of them have been locked up in a Youth Development Center (prison for juvenile offenders) for years before we got them. These juvenile’s charges ranged anywhere from rape of a child, to vehicular homicide and attempted murder. Only 1 juvenile offender graduated the program in 2007, 10 ran away, and 8 were sent back to a Youth Development Center.” Betsy also said, “Our statistics show that only 3% of the juvenile offenders that are put into our program make it through the program, live productive social lives, and do not go back into custody, or to prison”. (Betsy Brown, Personal Interview, July 16, 2009)
Submitting juvenile files into Federal Court sentencing can result to either an extended sentence or death penalty judgment increased. The policy was assed to ensure that juvenile criminal records are not used as part and parcel of adult’s sentence in court. This is justified by the fact that juvenile courts were aimed to deal with crooks with compassion and are also less significance
She got more vodka she slept badly that night. In the middle of the night Anna woke up she moved sluggishly like she was in a trance. She was in her socks and underwear. She went up to the attic she unlocked the padded room but left the key in the lock. She went into the padded room. Anna removed the diary and the keys on the outside. She stripped removing her underwear and
One early morning, other sloth was going to a dog a park. Her kids hated it there. For that reason was the smell of dog breath. Kids! , yelled the sloth. I’m going to the park.
“Nearly 200,000 underage teens enter the adult criminal-justice system each year, mostly for nonviolent crimes. On any given day, 10,000 juveniles are housed in adult prisons and jails” (Lahey, 2016). When juveniles are sent to juvenile court, the main focus is what they may be able to see if they are able to be rehabilitated. In most cases when a juvenile is transferred to adult court, they have committed a very serious crime, such as rape, murder, aggravated robbery or something way worse. “In addition, juvenile offenders were arrested for aggravated assault, forcible rape, murder and several other crimes almost as much as young adults” (Lacourse, 1998).