Augustus Caesar and Emperor Nero Comparision

The first characteristic of a great leader is being loved by their people. By way of example Jane Simmons wrote “ an aggressive military leader, he was feared but also admired by people in other land.” Sulieman scared the people that he needed to scare but he was admired by the people he helped. Also in Amit carters queen Elizabeth I summary it says “she was thought of as a good and wise ruler who was truly thought of as a good ruler

Due to his death, and the fact that there was no heir to receive the throne, many generals began a Roman Civil War to determine who received the throne. His persecution of Christians set on huge persecutions for other religions for many years afterward. He left the Roman Empire falling to pieces. His impact, everything that he did, amounted to a massive amount of oppression, criminal activity, cruelty, slavery, and persecution. Nero was by far the worst emperor to ever control Rome.

Augustus Caesar demonstrated military leadership skills, both in battle and in non-war related military matters. In The

Such acts were unheard of among previous emperors and granted him a power among the general popluace that most emperors would not in see. While largely popular early on, Nero would also use his power to pursue his own accords, including being overly involved in theatrical performances, agreeing to the death sentence of his own mother and taking advantage of the Roman fire to build his own palace and

Some countries did end up prospering off of good leaders. Absolutist leaders who actually cared about the well being of the country and its people rather than themselves. One example of this is Peter the Great of Russia. A General in his army, Alexander Gordon recounts his great respect and honor to serve under Peter when he writes about how he claimed St. Petersburg as a symbol of Russia, rampant with Russian nationalism, how could Sweden ever have a chance against them?(Doc 6) Peter the Great actually did a pretty good deal for Russia. He did his best to try to Westernize Russia which is what he thought would improve the country the most, some of his subjects were upset with the results, his leadership in Russia actually helped them under his reign. Another great example of a good monarch is Suleiman of Turkey, or the Ottoman Empire. In Document 9, Suleiman states, "Among the Turks…honors, high posts, and judgeships are the rewards of great ability and good service..." (Doc 9) Suleiman goes on to say the the lazy, the one who don't work will achieve no honor in Turkey. Suleiman never says anything like, "work or you'll be killed." he simply gives rewards based on merit instead of how he feels or what he wants. If one was to work their way up in the Suleiman system, they could potentially earn their way out of poverty, unlike in England where if the king says you are a serf, you are a serf. This is a lot of kindness to his people as far as a absolutist leader goes, which truly puts Suleiman on the list as one of the best and most liked leaders of this time

When we think about the historical significance of Rome, it comes down to its leaders and how these leaders ruled in their era. Confidence, commitment, inspiration, intuition, and creativity, are all essential traits that a ruler must possess. In my opinion, no one has demonstrated these important characteristics better than Caesar Augustus, or better known as Octavian. Octavian showed how good of administrator he was, which was well needed after years of civil strife and social unrest. On the other hand, military genius, Julius Caesar, was lacking in administrative qualities which infect, lead his era to have a period of civil war and bloodshed.

Although Julius Caesar was an excellent leader, he was not as great of a ruler as Augustus Caesar. A major key to being a good leader is that the leader should try to keep his or her people safe. Peace and protection is far better than havoc and destruction. Julius Caesar was a warlord, not a

Nero and Tiberius were two leaders who were liked by the public. Both starting their reigns young, Nero and Tiberius accomplished many things. Gaining the public’s eye, Nero gave Claudius a lavish funeral and personally delivered the oration in person. He founded a colony at Antium consisting of praetorian veterans, he gave the public an immense variety of entertainments, and even introduced his own style of architecture. These accomplishments all played a role in how the public adored him. Giving the public positive ideas will gain their trust, but unfortunately, he does not keep their trust. As Nero became older, his accomplishments became less and less, he began turning into someone who was in it for the money. His turning point was when he bankrupted Rome, once this happened Nero was neither trusted or liked.

When you think leader, some think kings like William the Conqueror, others think of Prime Ministers such Winston Churchill, or even the leaders of the civil rights movement Martin Luther King Jr. They were all great men and had their time in the sun as great leaders, and they were some of the greatest leaders of their respective times and generations. There are many characteristics that go into a great leader. Things such as measurable things like education and votes in elections are easy to see and give a good impression. The greatest leader must have some of those measurable in his life time. Along with those easily visible things you need a multitude of other

He had anyone he didn't like executed. He started to act crazy and to act more as an artist than an emperor. He spent a lot of money on big parties and started to perform his poetry and music in public. In 54 AD, Emperor Claudius died.

Have you ever waged war against your wife? Caesar Octavian Augustus did. Augustus was a great leader. Leaders are necessary because they need to show leadership amongst the people and unite the people as one doing anything to keep them safe. Caesar Octavian Augustus was one of Rome’s greatest leaders by showing that at the age of 19, he can rule one of the most powerful nations by any means including war (http://www.pbs.org/empires/romans/empire/augustus.html)

Many things can make or break a leader. Whether it's your mom, dad, teacher, or coach, they all share similar qualities that make us classify them as leaders in the first place. Leaders, such as Odysseus, can be confident and brave, but having a brain poisoned with selfishness and taking advantage of your followers can alter people's opinions on them. Leadership is not controlling, but it is helping people achieve a goal as a whole.

Nero is one of the most selfish emperors of Rome. Nero was blamed by many for the great fire of Rome which burnt seventy-five percent of Rome. He did this just to make room for his extravagant villa. He also began executing opponents and Christians. Nero would spend lavishly and behave inappropriately. He also committed suicide when Rome revolted. Nero will remain as one of the most selfish emperors of Rome ever.

Nero is so infamous because of the sheer number of atrocities that he committed during his lifetime. It had even been predestined that he would have a doomed life due to the horrific actions that his father had done and what was said at his birth “nothing that was not abominable and a public bane could be born of Agrippina and himself.” In addition, Nero was named after his uncle Claudius, who was a laughing stock of the empire. These were just two pieces that ultimately shaped Nero and his life. Nero had an insatiable lust for wealth, power, and torture, and did anything to get it. He ran around at night disguised as an old man and stabbed men on their way home from work and even ran over a boy on his horse who later

Whether a leader is feared or loved has been a debated issue by philosophers for many years. You could argue that a leader being loved is better because of the trust and motivation sides of things, or you could say to be feared is better because people follow rules and orders better. What is the role of government in human society? Whether being ruled under democracy, dictatorship, or autocracy all of these types of governments do however have one thing in common. All of these types of leaderships have one goal and that is to lead and rule the citizens under a “leaders” power which is established by the ruling parties and citizens. A leader controls everything in an organization, company, or group of people, and also knows exactly what is best for their followers. There are certain ways you can be a good leader, but sometimes these don’t work for everyone. Good leaders aren’t always the ones who are loved by all, but they are feared as well. So what makes a better leader, someone who is feared or loved?