The two greatest leaders of Rome are without a doubt Julius Caesar and Augustus Caesar. These two men have defined leadership for a country. Many other countries have modeled their ethics and used them as their own to better themselves as a whole. Without these two men, our world would not be the same in just about every way. Although these two men were both great, one of them was better than the other. Although Julius Caesar was a dominant leader, Augustus Caesar was certainly the better leader.
As stated before, Nero had some troubles in becoming Due to his death, and the fact that there was no heir to receive the throne, many generals began a Roman Civil War to determine who received the throne. His persecution of Christians set on huge persecutions for other religions for many years afterward. He left the Roman Empire falling to pieces. His impact, everything that he did, amounted to a massive amount of oppression, criminal activity, cruelty, slavery, and persecution. Nero was by far the worst emperor to ever control Rome.
He passed numerous laws that redistributed jobs and land among the roman citizens. Along with his kind heart, he was a strategic war fighter. He won and conquered a considerable amount of empires and battles. He also created the Julian calendar, the calendar we use today. His good deeds did not go unnoticed by the civilians, but in this case their opinions did not count. Even if he did have a god complex, he did not deserve to be brutally murdered.
Augustus Caesar demonstrated military leadership skills, both in battle and in non-war related military matters. In The
Nero's other interest included the arts and public interest, which included a "modest" amphitheater in Rome. To inaugurate his amphitheater, Nero held a gladiatorial fight, but never allowed the losers of matches to be killed, something uncommon in Ancient Rome. He also performed as a chariot rider in some contests
Whether a leader is feared or loved has been a debated issue by philosophers for many years. You could argue that a leader being loved is better because of the trust and motivation sides of things, or you could say to be feared is better because people follow rules and orders better. What is the role of government in human society? Whether being ruled under democracy, dictatorship, or autocracy all of these types of governments do however have one thing in common. All of these types of leaderships have one goal and that is to lead and rule the citizens under a “leaders” power which is established by the ruling parties and citizens. A leader controls everything in an organization, company, or group of people, and also knows exactly what is best for their followers. There are certain ways you can be a good leader, but sometimes these don’t work for everyone. Good leaders aren’t always the ones who are loved by all, but they are feared as well. So what makes a better leader, someone who is feared or loved?
Nero and Tiberius were two leaders who were liked by the public. Both starting their reigns young, Nero and Tiberius accomplished many things. Gaining the public’s eye, Nero gave Claudius a lavish funeral and personally delivered the oration in person. He founded a colony at Antium consisting of praetorian veterans, he gave the public an immense variety of entertainments, and even introduced his own style of architecture. These accomplishments all played a role in how the public adored him. Giving the public positive ideas will gain their trust, but unfortunately, he does not keep their trust. As Nero became older, his accomplishments became less and less, he began turning into someone who was in it for the money. His turning point was when he bankrupted Rome, once this happened Nero was neither trusted or liked.
Have you ever waged war against your wife? Caesar Octavian Augustus did. Augustus was a great leader. Leaders are necessary because they need to show leadership amongst the people and unite the people as one doing anything to keep them safe. Caesar Octavian Augustus was one of Rome’s greatest leaders by showing that at the age of 19, he can rule one of the most powerful nations by any means including war (http://www.pbs.org/empires/romans/empire/augustus.html)
Wyitt Ranck Mrs. Fetchko English IV 24 March 2017 What Leader Trumps All Else When you think leader, some think kings like William the Conqueror, others think of Prime Ministers such Winston Churchill, or even the leaders of the civil rights movement Martin Luther King Jr. They were all great men and had their time in the sun as great leaders, and they were some of the greatest leaders of their respective times and generations. There are many characteristics that go into a great leader. Things such as measurable things like education and votes in elections are easy to see and give a good impression. The greatest leader must have some of those measurable in his life time. Along with those easily visible things you need a multitude of other
Comprehensive Leadership Analysis Essay Many things can make or break a leader. Whether it's your mom, dad, teacher, or coach, they all share similar qualities that make us classify them as leaders in the first place. Leaders, such as Odysseus, can be confident and brave, but having a brain poisoned with selfishness and taking advantage of your followers can alter people's opinions on them. Leadership is not controlling, but it is helping people achieve a goal as a whole.
The book, “The Twelve Caesars,” describes the lives of the twelve caesars in the Roman Empire. There are many qualities that the reader can pick up that make a successful, and unsuccessful, Roman Emperor during this time period. When looking at the lives and qualities of Nero, Julius, Augustus, and Tiberius, there are many different personalities and qualities, which help the reader decide qualities of a successful and unsuccessful Roman Emperor.
Why is Nero so infamous? Nero is so infamous because of the sheer number of atrocities that he committed during his lifetime. It had even been predestined that he would have a doomed life due to the horrific actions that his father had done and what was said at his birth “nothing that was not abominable and a public bane could be born of Agrippina and himself.” In addition, Nero was named after his uncle Claudius, who was a laughing stock of the empire. These were just two pieces that ultimately shaped Nero and his life. Nero had an insatiable lust for wealth, power, and torture, and did anything to get it. He ran around at night disguised as an old man and stabbed men on their way home from work and even ran over a boy on his horse who later
can be short; especially for those in positions of power. Leaders come and go, some falling from power as quickly as they rose to it. Often, rulers are killed or removed from their position simply because someone else wanted their power. Bad choices also affect the people's support of their leaders. Both Julius Caesar and Czar Nicholas II had to make choices, as every ruler does. They lived centuries apart; just how similar can their lives be? Julius Caesar had a very long path to his position of leadership. Starting out as a soldier, he worked his way up in power, conquering lands and making friends in high places. He took a career in politics, working as a prosecuting advocate, quaestor and eventually serving as a governor of the then Roman province of Spain.
What makes a great leader? Throughout history, leaders around the world have been given the title of "great." Alexander III of Macedonia was one who was called the “great”. He lived from 356-323 BCE and ruled from the age of twenty until his death at the age of thirty-three. During his time as king, he united Greece, reestablished the Corinthian League and conquered the Persian Empire. In the wake of his father's murder, who was the king at the time, Alexander was determined to take role of his father’s throne.
Julius Caesar, once leader of the Roman empire, is often debated about over whether his ruling was a success or a failure. Caesar was born on July twelfth in 100 BCE (Mark, 2011, para. 1). His father, also named Julius Caesar was a praetor, and mother, Aurelia Cotta was an aristocrat. Both felt strongly about Roman politics, which explains how Caesar got where he did (Mark, 2011, para. 1). At sixteen years old, Caesar’s father died and, believing it was in best interest to his family, became priest to the god, Jupiter (Mark, 2011, para. 2). This was his first step in becoming a leader. Through a series of events such as being kidnapped by pirates then escaping and having them killed, saving a life in battle, etc. Caesar proved himself to be smart, strong, determined, and a good speaker (Mark, 2011, para. 3-4). Believing that only a sole ruler could end the violent factions, Caesar decided to rule as king without the title, as monarchy was prohibited (Hunt et. Al., 2013, p. 163). Although some think he was a failure in his time as dictator, Caesar was successful because he conquered an enormous amount of land, created the Julian calendar, and ruled his people victoriously.