Australia Should Not Agree For The Proposal Announced On The Paris Global Conference

1854 WordsJun 17, 20168 Pages
Standardization: Conclusion : Australia should not agree to the proposal announced in the Paris Global Conference. 1. The global agreement was not made previously as the need was not realized. 1.1 In the last few years that scientist has begun to measure the link between temperature and carbon level. 1.2 Over the past few years, there has been a sharp decrease in the percentage of American, who believes that global warming is a serious problem. 2. Despite the rising community skepticism about global warming, it was found to have added support than antagonism for a policy to put limits on carbon emissions. 2.1 “Capitalism must incorporate reforms to show complete and accurate measurements of the full spectrum of value, including both positive and negative externalities so that we can effectively respond to threatening crises like climate change.” 3. Nobel laureates are being ignored by the greenies to hide their fraudulence. 3.1 Nobel Laureate Robert Laughlin, there is no climatic change in the world that is brought about by the human actions 3.2 “The prediction was neglected by the greenies.”(Althor et al. 2016). (Premises 1-3 Convergent). Analysis of the argument: Premise one - As per the context, there is significant circumstantial evidence that poorer nations such as China and India wanted financial support from the developed countries in order to invest in developing clean technologies to reduce the emission of the green house gasses and also adapt

More about Australia Should Not Agree For The Proposal Announced On The Paris Global Conference

Open Document