Authentic Dissent And The Devil 's Advocate

A huge contributor to the big offense of day was Mr. reliable tight end Greg Olsen who had eight catches for a career-high 134 yards and two touchdowns! He took the Saints defense to school specifically cornerback Brandon Browner running right past him for a 52 yard chunk play that sparked the offense! The Saints left him wide open on many plays all I can say is thank you much appreciated! I continued to say this he is one of the best tight ends in the league;he is the veteran presence this offense needs with all the young players and Sunday his play seemed to rub off on the other receivers and opening up other big plays for the offense great execution all around and once again thank you to the Chicago Bears for giving us Greg Olsen!

Chris Hedges is the well-known author of “The Cost of Resistance”, an article written in November 2016. He is an award-winning New York Times best-selling author and ordained Presbyterian minister. Hedges has created a specific audience for this article by the religious references and literary appeals he uses. He shows humility within himself by not including a biography which would highlight his religious and scholarly affiliations but instead using examples from historic and expert references. Hedges uses this article by way of rhetoric appeal to warn and inform readers of the past repeating itself and the cost’s associated with it.

Live reports from Wolf 2 news, reporter Lee James has full coverage of the arrest of the top terror fugitive James Knowles.

Reportedly, Melanie Thornburg, a South Carolina Sheriff Captain, is in the hot seat after wearing blackface with a Bob Marley Halloween costume. Melanie Thornburg claims that, "I didn't do it out of lack of respect, and I express regret to anyone that took offense. I wouldn't have ever tried to taunt anyone."

The term groupthink in this report is defined as, the social psychological phenomenon that results in groups during pressure situations. This social psychology theory is broken down into eight signs. Illusion of invulnerability, Collective rationalization, Belief in inherent morality, Stereotyped views of out-groups, Direct pressure on dissenters, Self-censorship, Illusion of unanimity, Self-appointed “mindguards”. According to research conducted by Irving Janis, there are three conditions to groupthink. The first, "high group cohesiveness" which is the direction for a group to be in unity while working towards a goal, or to satisfy the emotional needs of its members. Secondly, the structural faults such as insulation of the group, lack

In “Commodify Your Dissent”, Thomas Frank insists that marketing no longer promotes conformity but, rather, promotes “never-ending self-fulfillment” and “constantly updated individualism” (para.6). I totally agree with the author. America is all about the idea of rebellious, finding different and being different. The idea of counterculture exists even early 1960, and it was never to stop. For example, jeans were made for the mine-workers; and it not suppose to wear outside of the house. However, the baby boomers decided to make a different, made jeans to be a trend fashion and wear it everywhere. American are always aiming differences and make it to be the trend, especially young people. Therefore, the producers create commercial, advertisement

Krakauer admits that Chris McCandless was a rash, but he insists he "wasn't a nutcase, he wasn’t a sociopath, he wasn’t an outcast. McCandless was something else-- although precisely what is hard to say. A pilgrim, perhaps" (85). Many thought McCandless was wise and he knew what he was dong, while others disagree, stating his poor decisions contributed to his own death. In my opinion, Chris was indeed wise- he was a young man who didn’t care about labels, brands, big things, or anything materialistic. Instead, he thrived on more important concepts of life like truth and freedom. He believed he would find his true self and relieved of society once he became one with the wild.

What if your best friend went on an adventure. They had everything they had ever wanted. They didn't tell you or their family where they were going or how long they would be gone. They just picked up and left. Would you respect their decision to not tell anyone their plans? Would you think that this was a good idea of theirs, or would you think that this was a stupid decision on their part? Well this is what Christopher McCandless did. In 1968 McCandless was born. He was born to a good, wealthy, and happy family. He had everything any child could ever wish for. He was smart, athletic, and had a good education. In June 1990 he completed collage. In July of 1990 Christopher McCandless left his family and almost all belongings, and didn't tell anyone where he was going, or how long he'd be gone. Three years later McCandless was found dead in a blue bus located in Alaska. He had died of starvation. He went off and, ¨lived his life.¨ McCandless went out and lived in the wild. While Christopher McCandless died peacefully, the question has arose on whether McCandless was a noble adventurer or an arrogant fool. The evidence from many stories and social media clearly states that McCandless was in fact an arrogant fool. Christopher McCandless was an arrogant fool because he was not prepared, he

The Preemptive dissent is a creative commons documentary that focuses on political policing in the United States of America during the Bush Administration's “War on Terror.” After the events of 9/11, security measures increased by tens of millions of dollars during the meetings of political figures; such as the G20 summit which had Toronto build a five million dollar wall around the meeting place. The security used for these assemblies have been denounced by interest groups and social groups for their use of military tactics. They are examined as being too abrasive while actively silencing protestors and treating them as terrorists at public protests. With the accompaniment of the News Media, and the ability to share almost anything over social

As the last cart teetered on a wheel before coming to stand upright the dwarves and men slumped against its side, gasping for breath and wiping sweat from their brows.

Explanation Edna Pontellier is awakened during this book. She discovers herself and discovers her own interests during the course of this novel.

Lessing believes that people in Western society desire to be a part of a group. She states that people are “group animals”, and she acknowledges that this is not necessarily a bad thing. However, Lessing also points out that people in a group are more likely to follow the opinion of others and less likely to go against the majority. She explains how difficult it is to maintain one’s individual opinion as a member of a group by citing various psychological studies that examine this phenomenon. She describes the

A world where slavery is still widespread, genocide is an everyday occurrence, and the voices of the common citizen is silenced. This would have happened if we only disagreed over such matters and not dissented. In the Decline of Radicalism, by Daniel J. Boorstin, he asserts that “disagreement is the life blood of democracy, dissension is its cancer” and that dissent is negative word. Boorstin also claims that “disagreement produces debate”, which is true, but could have all conflicts been solved with diplomacy? Dissent is the life blood of democracy and it is not negative; it is vital to how our nation came to be.

In the ¨Cost Of Survival”, the author proposes that adventures that who willingly put themselves in danger should be responsible for the pay for the fees of the SAR. The Search and Rescue team,

Normative influence primarily occurs in situations where an individual, when amidst others in a crowd, tend to go along with them primarily in order to be liked and accepted by them as part of their fraternity. Research has identified that normative inference normally occurs as an inborn human nature as human beings tends to associate themselves with others in order to maintain a good social contact and relationship with them. Ideally, normative influence is normally furthered by the need for an individual to increase their chances of surviving especially during adverse conditions. This entails that people may at times seem to agree with others just in order for them to appease themselves to them and avoid potential conflict of standing alone and standing out. In some situations normative influence may occur where individuals associate with complete strangers. In such cases, due to mutual fear for each other, an individual may naturally try to agree with the rest in order to avoid appearing as contradictory or controversial.