Autocratic Leadership Is Good For Making Business Decisions

According to the leadership theory by Kurt Lewin (1939), there are different leadership styles that affect group dynamics such as decision-making, effectiveness of group work, communication, collaboration, and etc. The two of leadership styles, authoritarian and participative, are highly related to the concept of groupthink. Groups with autocratic leaders who promote their preferred solutions are more likely to fall into groupthink than groups with non-promotional leaders (i.e. democratic and impartial) (Ahlfinger & Esser, 2001). In other words, groups led by controlling leaders who fail to encourage participation of group members in decision-making process would produce symptoms of groupthink and poor quality of decisions. On the other hand, groups with democratic leaders who make decisions by consulting with the group members while still maintaining control of the group are guarded against groupthink (Kearney & Gebert, 2009). So allowing greater input from group members protects groups from making faulty irrational decisions and encourages open discussion and critical appraisal.

Autocratic leadership, also known as authoritarian leadership is a leadership style characterized by individual control over all decisions and little input from group members. Autocratic leaders typically make choices based on their own ideas and judgments and rarely accept advice from followers. Autocratic leadership involves absolute, authoritarian control over a group. It can also be derived

Autocratic- In this management style, the manager becomes the sole decision maker. The manager does not care about the other staff and their involvement in decision making. Therefore, the decisions reflect the personality and the opinion of the manager. The decision does not reflect the team 's collective opinion.

Autocratic Approach: Autocratic leadership gives a positive belief about the updates about any policies. However this kind of approach is not highly regarded by many of the working environments. This is due to the amendments being brought into use prematurely for the uses to access them. This approach of leadership and management may be viewed as being too authoritative.

“Organizational Management and Leadership” defines autocratic manager as one who makes a decision and then informs the group about the decision. Anita Satterlee (2013). Organizational Management and Leadership. Ch. 1, Pg. 4. Synergistics International Inc.

Autocratic leadership, is a style which is characterized by the individual control over all the decisions and little input from group members. These type of leaders rarely accept advice from followers. These type of leaders tend to be bossy and controlling. Failing to consult with other team members in such situations hurts the overall success of the group.

There are many different examples of leadership qualities in the Lord of The Flies, shown by Ralph and Jack. Ralph was one we could call “for the people”, however Jack was the opposite, only looking out for himself. Ralph is made a strong democratic leader in the book, who listens, and cares about all the boys, while Jack is a strong autocratic leader, who doesn’t care and will not listen to the other boys. Not asking or taking any input from group members, making sole decisions, not letting group members participate in important tasks, and the leaders dictating the work, all these are examples of characteristics of autocratic leadership style. This leadership style can be beneficial in the sense of making quick decisions, because autocratic

← Autocratic leaders are task-oriented and focused. Their style tends to work well where there is a need for a lot of structure, with the non-routine and complex tasks, or where there is a production emphasis.

Autocratic leadership is a leadership style characterized by individual control over all decisions and little input from group members. Autocratic leaders typically make choices and rarely accept advice from followers. Autocratic leadership involves absolute control over a group.

Leadership can be defined as the ability to lead a group of people successfully in an organization. Hall, et al (2008) have mentioned that an effective leader has to be visionary, motivating and responsible in order to successfully run a business organization. In business the two key leadership styles, which are widely used in today’s corporate world are autocratic leadership and democratic leadership (Johnson, n.d.). Autocratic leadership may be explained as “a leadership style where the manager sets objectives, allocates tasks and insists on obedience” (Hall, et al 2008 p.g 401). Conversely, democratic leadership encourages “participation in decision making” (Hall, et al 2008 p.g 402). Whilst many people would consider autocratic

An autocratic leadership involves a leader who holds complete authority. That means that he/she makes the decisions. So the followers have no input or influence whatsoever. For instance, countries such as Cuba and North Korea operate under the autocratic leadership style.

An autocratic leader tells employees what to do and how to do it. On the opposite extreme, a laissez-faire leader allows employees to make their own decisions with little leader involvement. In the middle lies participative leadership where the leader includes employees in the decision-making process and lets them take part in determining what to do and how to do it.

Autocratic leadership is a classical leadership style with the following characteristics: manager seeks to make as many decisions as possible, manager seeks to have the most authority and control in decision making, manager seeks to retain responsibility rather than utilise complete delegation , consultation with other colleagues in minimal and decision making becomes a solitary process managers are less concerned with investing their own leadership development, and prefer to simply work on the task at hand. Whereas Democratic Leadership is the leadership style that promotes the sharing of responsibility, the exercise of delegation and continual consultation. The style has the following characteristics: manager seeks consultation on all

The key strengths of participative leadership style are increased productivity and job satisfaction. When employees are afforded an opportunity to be involved in the organization’s decision making process, they are likely to develop a strong sense of commitment to the organization as well as increase their performance. Job satisfaction is another key strength of this leadership style. Most employees display high levels of job satisfaction when they notice their suggestions and/or recommendations are taken seriously and in some instances implemented within the organization. Additionally, this

The first difference between two theories is the role of the leader. In autocratic theory leader has all power, poor relationship with followers and makes decision independently. There is no vision, inspiration and motivation. In addition, the leader does not actively participate in group. On the other hand, “Transformational leaders inspire people with a shared vision of the future. They set clear goals and motivate people in reaching them. And, they communicate clearly with their teams. Transformational leaders expect the best from everyone on their team as well as from themselves leading to improved motivation and high productivity” (March 2013 Leadership Insight). The leader always participates actively because the leader shares the power.http://www.mwaexeccoach.com/insight/March%202013%20Leadership%20Insight.pdf