preview

Ayn Rand's Probjectivism Vs Objectivism

Decent Essays

In both Crito and The Virtue of Selfishness, the two philosopher authors make incredibly compelling and thought-provoking arguments concerning their extremely different moral codes. Socrates believed in a strict universal code of ethics that promoted compliance to authority and not causing harm to others under any circumstances. On the other hand, Ayn Rand believed in the pursuit of your own self-interest through rationality and reason. She also deliberately pokes holes in altruistic ideas, deeming them dysfunctional for survival in a realistic society. In this essay, I will explain and provide critical evidence as to why I believe Ayn Rand’s objectivist ideas outweigh Socrates’s rather altruistic philosophies. Ayn Rand believed in objectivism, which holds that the purpose of morality is to define man’s proper interests and values and that a man’s concern with his own interests is the true essence of his moral existence. Rand also strongly emphasized the notion of “rational selfishness” that leads to actions necessary for survival. She stated that “since nature does not provide man with an automatic form of survival—he has to support his life by his own effort” (Rand 6). She felt that it is a man’s responsibility to obtain a high level of independence in order to, in turn, have a high level of morality. Lastly, she stated that “the actor must always be the beneficiary to his action” (Rand 8).
To explain and promote the validity of objectivism, Rand analyzed the perceived

Get Access