BASF Motivation Statement

When talking about sustainability numerous people associate it with just protecting the environment. Sustainability is far more than going green, but it is a principle that many companies have adopted and have worked persistently to improve over the last several years. Sustainability is defined as the ability to continue a behavior indeterminately, but it also includes improving human life overall. Sustainable development is broken down into three pillars: economic, social, and environmental (Harich & Bangerter, 2014). Economics is the study of how people use resources, which correlates to the goal of sustainable development by using resources to their full potential (Laszlo, C., & Zhexembayeva, N., 2011, p. 60). Economic sustainable development allows companies to give their customers what they want without overusing mutual resources. Social development combines the social world with the physical realm to provide a good quality of life (Benoit, 2010, p. 7). Social sustainability focuses on the well-being of people and their communities. Environmental development, the most recognizable, includes protecting the environment by reducing pollution, recycling, switching of electronic devices when not in use, etc. All three of these pillars make up what is known as sustainable development. In this paper, I researched a company and their involvement in sustainability and how it applies to the

Although there is no formal definition for the term, individuals have tried to define sustainability according to their function or area of study. The term “sustainability,” once an obscure ecological concept, has now been adopted by many in the business world to connote the principles of social and environmental responsibility (Joseph Fiksel, Jonathan Low and Jim Thomas). Further, sustainability can be seen through the eyes of business as a way to create value. More likely than not, the term sustainability can be linked to the ability of decreasing costs, wastes and inefficiencies. According to the vice president of General Electric,

Many firms are learning that being environmentally friendly and sustainable has numerous benefits. (O.C Ferrell, Fraedrich, Ferrell, 2015). This could enable them to increase goodwill from various stakeholders and also save money in the long term. This will mean that they are being more efficient and less wasteful of resources, which will enable them to be more competitive by satisfying stakeholders. The CEO of

Business sustainability, which originally was viewed as a question of corporate governance, has now emerged as a central, multifaceted theme of the twenty- first century. It is now the responsibility of corporate boards and managers to focus on business sustainability by creating enduring value for shareholders and managing the interests of other stakeholders, including creditors, employers, suppliers, government, and society at large.

College is a narrow box that limited our life experience and choice in future. Gerald Graff says in his articles, ‘Our schools are not seeing the academic potential of the topic outside of school.’ (Graff, 268) School doesn’t give us access to the topic that they think are not important which limit our knowledge. Charles Murray also says, ‘the culture push people who don’t have academic ability or motivation to attain their degree on they just fail.’ (Murray, 238) It limits our opportunity of experiencing things other than academic works. Life learning should be a collection of knowledge and experience, both are equally significant. Knowledge alone is no useful unless we make some connection between them. Therefore, life experience is necessary.

The purpose of this paper is to compare the sustainability practices of two companies in the same industry. The two companies chosen for comparison are The Hershey Company and Coca-Cola Enterprises, both of which are in the consumer staples industry. These two corporations are ranked sixth and eighth, respectively, on the Newsweek Top Green Companies in the U.S 2015. They have taken pride in creating sustainable product designs, having environmentally sustainable processes and supply chain management.

As stated earlier, these operations are in the United States but also in other countries. Fluor also possesses strength in maintaining a consolidated order backlog; the overall project’s backlog increase year by year. Over the recent years, sustainability has become a major aspect in society. Many companies, especially Fluor, are highly focused on sustainability, enhancing the company’s brand image. Fluor has helped many clients reduce greenhouse-gas-emissions and developed patented carbon-dioxide recovery technologies such as Fluor Solvent (Fluor Corporate Information, 2017). Employees ability to create and adapt is apparent in this initiative. Assets include the thousands of employees that are part of the workforce and Fluor having the ability to say that they uphold principles of integrity by being named one of the most ethical companies for many years. With strengths, there are always weaknesses. One weakness of Fluor is inconsistency on projects and services causing for a lack of job availability. Another weakness is various litigations tarnishing the company’s image. While Fluor is the elite, there are also other competitors, such

Sustainability has achieved a more ecological tone in the past few decades in terms of a business model, but it originally derives from the concept that a business is successful due to the interconnected areas of economics, culture and ecology. Sustainability is now becoming a somewhat fad and thus it is understandable that it could be misconstrued by some as a form of “greenwashing”. Greenwashing is the idea that a company markets their “green” or environmentally friendly changes in policy and values, despite no actual concrete changes in these areas, for example some argue that Fiji Water greenwasher in terms of their marketing as an environmentally friendly water company despite their little effort to actually go carbon-neutral. Many companies are seeing the

The Dow Chemical Company has been around since 1950 and currently boasts approximately 53,000 employees. They, like Monsanto, are proudly committed to sustainability by “going beyond our current capabilities and the reach of our products and solutions” and they pursue game-changing collaborations to advance social and environmental progress (Dow.com.) Their goal to boost agricultural productivity while preserving the environment sounds perfectly responsible but it is what they are not telling an unsuspecting public about their solutions that may be a problem in the long-run (Dow.com.)

The majority of people in today’s global society have a false sense of security in believing that the effects of climate change will not take place until the very distant future, and are to dire to bear engaging. Environmental protection is currently one of the largest social issues facing different groups within society including; governments, special interest groups, everyday citizens and global organisations. The actions of organisations with regards to environmental sustainability are becoming a larger factor in business operations. Today’s more informed society expects businesses to perform out of the traditional economic measure of profit motive and adjust to society’s efforts to achieve modern sustainability goals. BHP Billiton (BHP) is the largest and leading global resources company, being the world’s largest producers of major commodities including; coal, copper, iron ore, nickel and uranium. BHP’s annual revenue for 2014 can be rounded off to $607,206million US Dollars and currently hires 128,800 employees and contractors over 141 locations. These figures not only represent how large BHP is, but they highlight the importance of BHP’s contribution to help achieve

He came with a vision of environmental sustainability.” Tyler explained that the company was wasting so much and was not an environmentally friendly corporation (para.1). Elm is now vice president of corporate and business sustainability. He stated, “Sustainability is strategy” (para.2). “Under the banner of corporate social responsibility (CSR)- the notion that business should have a moral conscience on social issues, and a concern for the needs of future generations when it comes to the environment” (para. 4).

Sustainability has become a great topic of interest in many arenas. Particularly, leading organizations are recognizing sustainability needs to be an essential aspect of their long term strategies. With this recognition, better business practices are being sought by investors as well as sustainability is becoming a driving force for better efficiencies and innovation. Two organizations, Wal-Mart and Starbucks, have both took on sustainability as long term initiatives to address their customer needs and affect how their suppliers operate.

Oil is the basis of industrial production and the necessity of economic development. Human life can not be separated from the oil. Mobil was found in 1882 and is the largest producer of oil, natural gas and oil refineries in the world (Mobil, 2014). Shell is made of the Royal oil of Holland and the United Kingdom Mobil, and is the largest producer of oil, gas, and petrochemicals, and is the largest retailer of automotive fuels and lubricants (Shell, 2015). As two world's largest oil companies, Mobil and Shell play key roles in different areas, especially in the area of corporate social responsibility, which contains extensive content referring to workers, customers, environment, and community. This essay will compare and evaluate corporate social responsibility of ExxonMobil and Shell in the criterion of safety, sustainability and education.

There are three pillars that make up overall sustainability: social, economic, and environmental sustainability. Social sustainability focuses on all human needs being met and a society functioning properly indefinitely. Economic sustainability is achieving a certain level of economic success indefinitely. It also involves having an extremely low percent of people living below the poverty line, which relates to social sustainability. Environmental sustainability is described as, “the rates of renewable resource harvest, pollution creation, and non-renewable resource depletion that can be continued indefinitely.” ("Finding and Resolving the Root Causes of the Sustainability Problem", 2014) Achieving environmental sustainability will positively affect the social and economic aspects. These three categories are directly related to each other, and to truly reach complete sustainability each of the group’s needs must be met. There are many ways for individuals, groups, companies, and societies to help make a difference in reaching this goal. Environmental issues are currently very prominent in the US and other countries. There are countless activists and researchers doing everything they can to make a difference. Most businesses, like

Sustainability when we try to understand in the context of corporate is recognizing that the corporation’s long