Background Checks

Besides, assisting the ex-offenders in becoming competitive is equally important to make them productive to their employers if given equal opportunities. The program in Kentucky aims at making the employer understand their situation while getting back to the society. Thus, it assists them psychologically and through other means to prepare to face new challenges. Besides, some of the counties and cities that note the devastating effect of not employing the ex-convicts remove the criminal records from a job application. The reform commonly has the name ‘ban the box’ that aim at reducing discrimination of qualified ex-convicts while applying for jobs (Entin, 2015). The use of ban the box is beneficial especially in the early stages of the hiring process when employers do not know their potential employees

Then there are those who fall through the cracks. The ones who have a poor record but get lost in the system and get approved anyways. This happens way more than we think because there is so many people requesting a background check for more than just a weapons license. The FBI

Although I can pass a background check, many companies are using Live Scan background checks that would show my arrest in 1999. I would like to request expungement before I apply to any position so I do not hinder my chances of employment. I am trying to use my skills and talents to work with children to help build a stronger community. Instead of wating others people time with an application that might not make it, i thought Id be proactive so i can increse my chances of gainful employement.

This poses dilemmas as for employment breaks. Another disadvantage that comes to play is the initiative filling out the form of employment (The application). On that application for employment; reads a box that states criminal history, arrests previous to applying, also asks

1538). If a federal law were to be enacted it should follow the guidelines that Weissert (2016) advocates. Instead of allowing employers to ask about criminal history in the interview stage the employers should have to wait until a conditional offer of employment has been made (Weissert, 2016, p. 1552). The employer should consider the nature of the crime, the time elapsed since conviction, and the positon the applicant is applying for (Weissert, 2016, p. 1552). Discriminating on the basis of criminal history increased the rates of recidivism and has a greater impact on Afircan American and Hispanic males (Weissert, 2016, p. 1531). Ban the Box might not be the solution for the issue of discriminating on the basis of an applicant’s criminal history, but it is a step in the right

However, the background check screening has created a big gap between policy and practices and force homeless sex-offenders and Meth drug users out of communities. Consequently, lack of consideration of more support from federal and states collateral with frequently deny from communities and employment opportunity, may contribute in high levels of economic vulnerability, as well as, increase the magnitude of any social risky behaviors such as drug use and sex-crimes. While the intended purposes of registered lifetime sex-offender and permanent bans on public housing are mandatory by federal law on applicants who have been convicted sex crime or methamphetamine, (Crowell, 2017), Community attitudes need to be changed toward homeless registered

Phillip it is clear that you have a complete explanation of the back ground requirement that so many employers utilize to classify potential employees. Yet with this classification many very capable candidates are quickly eliminated for either old run in’s with the law or youthful ignorance. To this end, we as a society have alienated the youth who have fallen into the trap of conviction of a crime. Clearly it is not necessary to penalize people who have repaid their debt to society for their life making them unfit for hire. The question is what is the answer to solve this injustice that is imposed on these candidates? In my view companies could have what they call a conditional hire that would go longer for a year than a traditional 90 day

A history of incarceration reduces an ex-felon’s chance of being hired by fifteen to thirty percent as well as the annual number of weeks worked by six to eleven weeks. That is a large amount of people! This is a big problem that is not to be dismissed. Having been incarcerated leads to struggles in finding a job. Some employers do not even consider hiring people with any kind of criminal record, they are much more likely to hire someone without one instead (Prison Legal News). These statistics and studies show that unemployment rates are in fact higher for

“Capabilities didn’t matter; neither did skills, past experiences, or aptitude. The sum of everything else was blotted out by a criminal conviction.” (Burton) This is the testimony of hundreds of former criminals,

If you plan to live, work, or study in another country legally, you need to receive a resident, work, or student visa. One requirement of the visa process is a statement from your government that you are not a habitual or wanted criminal. In the United States, this is accomplished by obtaining an FBI Criminal Background Check, also known as a Criminal History Summary. You can download the required fingerprint cards and forms from the FBI website. Once completed by the FBI, the forms are good for six months.

The main issue with background checks is a broken system it now operates under. The national instant criminal background check system has been in use since 1998 and to date has processed “160 million transactions of these almost one million were denied.” (National Instant Criminal Background Check System Operations 2012) While these numbers may sound promising we will explain later on why it has not had the desired effect. “As a result of the gun control act of 1968, certain people, such as convicted felons, immigration violators, sexual offenders and many others are prohibited from

I believe that a more indepth comprehensive background check could elimante the potinatal for a gun to fall into the hands of a child. .Students involved in school shootings usally use there parents guns. Having done a more stricter background check could have prevented a parents carlesness. Guns fall into the hands of kids by the carlesness of a parents action. A strciter background check could help identify problems that a regular background check would missed. If we focus more on the history of the parent it could show possible problems that would deem a parent irresponsible. As of now the background checks only go back and show if there are felonys but it dosent show if the student was a troubled kid in the past.

Discussing the methods in which Pager used, the following consisted of conducting surveys for employers, ethnographic studies of the jobless, statistical analyses of employment patterns & experimental studies of hiring behavior, as well as experimental studies of hiring behavior. Starting with the surveys, they gathered a large group of participants, asking as to whether a criminal record would be a determining factor in hiring a potential employee. Based on the studies, it was shown that it does have strong impact, stating that there’d been “…a strong reluctance on the part of employees to have applicants with criminal histories…” (Pager, 41) The second method was the statistical analyses of employment trajectories. This was meant to “identify reliable patterns in the experiences and outcomes of individuals with varying characteristics.” (Pager, 46) In this part, the main objective was to figure

This process can be viewed as a double edged sword as the applicant if given the opportunity to explain his plight, may be able to convince the employer that they are the person for the job in spite of the past record. Or, the delay in the disclosure may cost the employer in time and resources upon disclosure to seek other applicants if the applicant is disqualified for the charges. As Doleac and Hansen state regarding the inability of employers to determine up front if the applicant has a criminal history, the employer defaults to statistics which “eliminate groups that they think, on average, are more likely to have a recent conviction” (How Ban The Box Backfires,

Everyone deserves a second chance. You should never judge a book by its cover. These are some of the things that should be considered when an employer considers hiring an ex-offender reentering society after release from the prison system. Once a criminal, always a criminal is not always the case. Some ex-offenders have proven to be loyal and trustworthy employees. As well as tax-paying individual who open their own businesses. There are positives and negatives to hiring someone with a criminal background. There are many concerns by employers to hire an ex-offender, such as negligent hiring. An ex offender is a person who has been convicted of criminal offense. Over 600,000 people are being released from prisons