Essay about Balanced Scorecard for the Automotive Industry

The use of a balanced scorecard when gauging the performance of executives at Paradigm Toys is useful because it measures several key areas that measure past and real time performance that directly affects the company. A balance scorecard can contain both financial and nonfinancial measures as well as both quantitative and qualitative performance measures. Additionally because a balance scorecard can be tailored to the business’s specific targets it can measure the substance of performance better that basic financial indicators that are usually considered the basis of performance ratings. It is important to use more than just financial indicators, because other factors, those qualitative in nature, measure how an employee does their job and gives a larger picture of how well an employee performs. For example, in the case of sales concerning installation of home improvement products one might be measured by repeat buyers or customer satisfaction of how well the salesman followed up with their sale and installation. This kind of non-financial factor can be used to measure the company’s goal of repeat buyer and customer satisfaction which can translate into future sales and growth. Financial indicators are used in similar ways, but are more quantitative in nature. The main reason to use financial indicators is because they can provide a clear picture

Conclusion: As such, the MCS should have been initially detailed using this reverse order for consistent presentation as well as acting as a catalyst to the planning subsystem of the core control system. In doing so, goals can be set in accordance to the company culture and structure. This enables management to influence the behaviour of more employees by providing clear goals. This makes for a better feedback system because it includes the information of the various departments/divisions and all levels of employment. This allows for attainable goals and prevents the imposition of unrealistic goals, MBO, and the likelihood of fraudulent reporting. To further prevent fraudulent reporting, the measurement subsystem should rely equally on the accounting system as well as non-financial measures (balanced score card).

A balanced scorecard is a method company’s use to measure their performance. It includes objectives, strategies, and tactics. This paper will contain two strategic objectives for each of the four balanced scorecard areas (shareholder value or financial perspective, customer value perspective, process or internal perspective, and learning and growth perspective) for H & R Block. It will also have two strategies for every objective, one tactic for each strategy, and two methods to monitor and control the overall strategic plan for H&R Block.

“The balanced scorecard should translate a business unit’s mission and strategy into tangible objectives and measures. The measures represent a balance between external measures for shareholders and customers and internal measures of critical business processes, innovation and learning and growth. The measures are balance between outcome measures, the results of past efforts, and the measures that drive future performance. And the scorecard is balanced between objective, easily quantified outcome measures and subjective, somewhat judgmental, performance…”

Based on (Marr and Creelman, 2010) found that the balanced scorecard is used to ensure high-performance

The balanced scorecard is a strategic planning and management system that was developed by Dr. Robert S. Kaplan and Dr. David P. Norton in the early 1990's. Their goal was to provide organizations with a clear understanding of what to measure in order to improve performance and results (Balanced Scorecard Institute 2014). The balanced scorecard is a framework that allows an organization to measure performance and compare it to the organization’s strategic objectives and goals (Kinney and Raiborn 2013, 10).

Introduction- To be competitive, organizations must be both strategic and tactical to the nth degree, must be proactive rather than reactive, and must find a way to measure this easily and accurately. One way to accomplish this is through a Balanced Scorecard approach; a tool often viewed as one of the best tools that helps organizations translate strategy into performance. In general the BSA (Balanced Scorecard Approach) allows for a clear strategic and tactical directions for the organization, retains financial measurements in a summation along with their links to performance, and highlights an important and robust measurement system that links and integrates customers, stakeholders, processes, resources, and performance into single measurement strategy.

A balanced scorecard is the comprehensive collection of ongoing activities and processes that organizations use to systematically coordinate and align resources and actions with mission, vision and strategy throughout an organization making it a strategic planning and management system. (Balanced Scorecard Institute, 1998-2010). The scorecard exposes financial, customer, employee learning and growth, and internal business process objectives crucial to attaining goals of the vision and mission statements. When establishing such objectives, an evaluation of the company’s vision statement, mission statement, and furthermore, core values is

The balanced scorecard now plays an important role in organization management. It has been further identified and used as an important tool in today 's business processes. According to Eric W. Noreen et al. (2002), "a balanced scorecard consists of an integrated set of performance measures that are derived from and support a company’s strategy. A strategy is essentially a theory about how to achieve the organization’s goals" (p. 551). Previously, management had been overwhelmed with data for a long

The foundation of effective strategic planning framework is the inclusion of goals and objectives that capture shareholder value, customer value, process and internal operations, and learning & growth objectives for employees. All of these factors must be orchestrated around a compelling vision and mission for the business. An effective balanced scorecard can transform a diverse enterprise into a single, unified organization that strives to attain the most challenging goals and objectives together (Abernathy, 1997). For companies including We Do Your Proposal, the potential exists for delivering transformational value to customers through the use of a balanced scorecard strategy planning and management process. Balanced scorecards have been shown to continually improve the clarity of vision and probability of long-term success for even the most compel of enterprises that adopt them (Jennings, 2010).

This article describes the benefits and concerns of adopting balanced scorecards as a performance management tool to meet organisational missions and strategies. It discusses the areas of: financial, customer, internal business, and learning and growth perspectives and how they relate to balanced scorecards; the principles involved in using balanced scorecards; how balanced scorecards are beneficial for an organisation; the administrative support required; and the outcomes that can be achieved from employing balanced scorecards as a performance management tool.

The balanced scorecard is a strategic management system that helps guide corporate strategy to meet a number of disparate objectives (BSI, 2011). It does this by highlighting for managers the key objectives in a number of areas in order to find the strategy that best meets all of the objectives. These areas are the financial, customer, learning and growth, and internal business processes. Kaplan and Norton (2004) make the case that in order to create value, three behaviors are important focusing on the customer, being creative and innovative and delivering results. Most of the measures in the balanced scorecard will relate to this underlying philosophy.

In the modern business and organizational environment, particularly as a result of globalization, competition equates performance. To be competitive, organizations must be both strategic and tactical to the nth degree, must be proactive rather than reactive, and must find a way to measure this easily and accurately. One way to accomplish this is through a Balanced Scorecard approach; a tool often viewed as one of the best tools that helps organizations translate strategy into performance. In general the BSA (Balanced Scorecard Approach) allows for a clear strategic and tactical directions for the organization, retains financial measurements in a summation along with their links to performance, and highlights an important and robust measurement system that links and integrates customers, stakeholders, processes, resources, and performance into single measurement strategy. This tool also provides the organization with a tool that takes vision and moves it to strategy, and the conversely, strategy into tactics. BSA supports planning and unites the organization into a more singular vision and common goal. It also allows for both internal and external feedback so that performances and results continue to evolve and improve.

Since an organization is composed of multiple levels, a scorecard must support different levels and perspectives from strategic business units and divisions, to departments, teams and individuals. To accommodate this architecture, the scorecard is structured as multiple, aggregated cubes. Each layer a nesting of the ones below. In general, the highest level cube defines the measures and dimensions that apply to the corporate level, and these drill through to divisional and departmental cubes that have a more detailed level of information (Nickols, 1999). This “artery” of the cubes lets the strategy communicate down the organization, while performance is aggregated up through the organization like blood through vein.

A balanced scorecard is a popular management tool that evaluates a company’s performance with both financial and nonfinancial measures (Hendricks). This concept was developed after the realization that a company could not determine its success by one factor (Manzoni 193). Organizations are complex, often consisting of multiple departments which have different goals and measures of success. Choosing one factor to explain the organization’s achievement as a whole is near impossible. “Financial indicators, for example, are typically considered to be ‘lagging indicators of performance,’ because they record