Ban On Tobacco Advertisements By The Government Of India

The Government of India has created an anti-tobacco plan to tackle the growing issues of tobacco, health concerns, and rising death toll. Their first goal was to eliminate advertising as this was perceived to encourage the youth to take up the dangerous habit. This ban posed ethical and commercial challenges for both sides of the argument. The government has the power to pass laws to help prevent people from smoking and protect its people. They found the ethical decision was to use this power by creating and

Debate.org says that, "79% of people were for the ban and 21% of people were against the ban".  Some comments that were left on this website regarding the ban include, "smoking harms everyone, including children" and "it is so unhealthy,

Smoking cigarettes causes more deaths than HIV, illegal drug use, alcohol use, motor vehicle injuries, and firearm- related incidents combined. Some people say that banning cigarettes would be bad because the government makes a lot of money from the tax revenues. Or that it would increase illegal trade. But based off of the fact that millions of people die each year, cigarettes should be banned because it causes many health issues, it affects a lot of people, and it costs the government a lot of money.

The use of tobacco has become a global problem. Tobacco poses serious health issues to both kids and adults. People in today's society believe that the government has no right to take smoking away from the public. I think of it in a completely different way. First of all smoking is very expensive. These expenses don't just get payed by the people; non smokers also pay for people to smoke indirectly. They pay for people to smoke via public assistance. Second of all, smoking is extremely bad for your health. Smoking results in many health complications. Finally, smoking does not just risk the life of a smoker. Smoking will also harm the people around you.

The prohibition of tobacco has been trending in foreign nations such as Finland, Norway and France. To conduct similar constraints is the intention of the government of India. Endangerment and possible victims of hazards are the concerns of those who are in favor of banning tobacco as well as other precarious commodities such as handguns and narcotics in India. Millions of deaths around the world have been the aftereffect of tobacco and cigarette smoking since the 90’s. Predictions of an increase of death toll would occur in the latter years to come. Utilization of tobacco among the youth is the product of propagandas’ enticements. Consequently, an increase in medical expenses such as hospital bills and health care expenditures would become the repercussion of such consumption. Additionally, even supposing that the occupation of 26 million people is the liability of tobacco industries, a boycott of tobacco and job turnovers would not create an adverse impact on the economy of India. Investments in other stocks would enhance the Indian economy. Finally, a decline of tobacco consumption would become fruitful if there is a proper implementation of banning tobacco endorsements.

“Tobacco is an agricultural crop, most commonly used to make cigarettes. It is grown all over the world and supports a billion-dollar industry.” Tobacco is one of the huge issues that include people in our society. Many people are using sources that will bring up tobacco. Even though TVs, radios or cigarettes packs have warnings on them, people still continue to do it. The government should take more actions to this problem; actions that will make people want to realize the cause that is given to them. Tobacco may not seem to be dangerous but it has causes to humans. People may feel good when they smoke, do shisha or other tobacco related sources that include the same chemicals, but they do not realize the risks that tobacco brings. Therefore, tobacco use should be decreased.

In conclusion, the tobacco industry is very harmful to society’s health. Cigarettes are the only legal consumer products in the world that cause half of their long-term users to die prematurely. Putting a ban on advertisement was just a start to not advertise so the tobacco industry would not solicit children, but the tobacco industry has come up with different strategies to solicit adolescents even more. If a law was passed to ban tobacco completely, citizens of the United States would not have to worry about second hand smoke, reduces the chance of cancer, and health

There are several reasons why government should regulate smoking. One of them is that public health care cost for smokers are bear by all citizens including non-smokers. The inconsiderate disposal of cigarettes waste is another big environmental issue for the country. The most undesirable impact is bearing the effects of the cigarette smoke in public areas such as bus stops or sheltered walk-ways.

The supporters made a strong argument on the financial contribution of the tobacco industry to the Indian economy, in that they showed that not only the profits made in tax were low, but the spending made on health as a result of smoking, surpassed the tax profits by one third of the tax revenue. In regards to lost jobs as a result of decreased sales of tobacco products, it was claimed that a study found that there was a good chance for job creation, as consumers will shift their money to other industries that require more workers than the tobacco industry.

Everybody has their own opinions when it comes to banning cigarettes all around America. If you smoke, you usually have a different opinion then those who don’t smoke cigarettes, but it’s something that does need to be taken control of and stopped. It isn’t only a nasty addiction, but its threatening people’s lives, and even those lives of the ones who don’t smoke. It isn’t okay to let minors get cigarettes, or put yourself in the position of getting a disease or dying, so why keep smoking in America and let this awful addiction take control of your life?

The discussion of advertising tobacco products is a controversial topic, there are relevant points on both sides of the argument, so it is hard to determine a true ethical decision. India’s government announced the bill banning tobacco companies from advertising their products in February 2001, their goal is to prevent adolescents from taking up smoking or any other form of tobacco products. Initiating this bill is the government answer to an ethical challenge, they are protecting the health of the entire country, rather than the financial future of one industry. (Bauer, 2016) Immediately, there was an uproar that sparked this intense debate, arguments between health concerns versus constitutional rights. In this paper I would like to discuss the pros and cons of banning the advertisement of tobacco products and the conflict of interest that it presents.

Therefore, in the favor of welfare of Indian citizen, I stand for ban on tobacco advertising

In 2001, Indian government imposed ban on advertisement of tobacco brands and sponsoring sports and cultural events. As tobacco is considered hazardous and dangerous to health, which leads to death, Government for welfare of citizens and for controlling the consumption of tobacco, decided to make it part of governmental law of ethics. The law declarement caused great conflicts in users and non-users, the advertisement companies reacted badly as tobacco advertisement contributes great part in sponsoring events and sports. The tobacco producing companies made great disagreement, by claiming that it is sole responsibility of smoker as its properties and risks are obvious and aware,

I agree with the Indian government’s action to ban on smoking. If the ban was implemented properly or not is an important question. As a government working for its citizens, they are obligated to ban tobacco advertising. If

Smoking bans have a high pro on our community. They help protect the health of people, smoking bans ensure that smoking in public place will prevent non-smokers to come in contact with second-hand smoke. They help lower healthcare cost, they reduce chances of becoming ill or ending up in the hospital. It helps people save money because of how