Many people think we should ban animals in captivity, and others may think we should not ban the animals. Honestly we should not ban animals. There's plenty of reasons why we should not ban animals from zoos and other exhibits. In "Myth And Reality" it says as long as the animals are kept in captivity they are suppose to get treated humanly, because studies have shown that animals suffer mentally, emotionally, and even physically. It also says that zoos claim to teach visitors about the wild life conservation and habitat protection. Its not so much that the animals aren't in their natural habitat because the zoos make their large cages look and seem like if they are in their natural habitat. On the other hand people think we should ban the
Also another way to help animal captivity is some zoos keep animals that are injured but that should be the only thing that zoos can keep. Yes, some animals can't go back in the wild but they should stay in captivity but you shouldn't keep fully health animals in captivity because they die faster. Some animals get hurt in the wild but they should only be in captivity. They shouldn't have animals that are just for entertainment in captivity they should be there for a good reason not something like
My first reason that zoos should be closed is that animals don’t have anything important to them because zoos take it away. According to peta.org, its says “captive animals are deprived of everything that is natural and important to them, and as a result, the become bored and lonely and may even suffer from a condition called zoochosis.” by the animals being lonely, they can get
It is an irrefutable fact that, every living creature has the right to live with respect and dignity in this world and they should be given an opportunity to experience their fundamental rights like food, clothes and shelter. Therefore, zoos are the place where all the necessary amenities are met for the animals. So, it is definitely not a good idea to ban zoos. I do not accord with the given statement.
Imagine being a zoo animal. Wouldn’t the animal want to be free, and not in captivity? There should not be zoos. From outside of a cage it is barely noticeable, but what is happening to the zoo animals is not right. There should not be zoos because animals cannot exercise which leads to health issues, they have little to no space which causes depression, and there are other places that help animals in a safer and more productive way. The history of zoos is that animals would be in tin cages, now, they live in fake terrain, so none of these habitats are appropriate for animals. Zoos say that they are helping endangered animals, but really they are killing them.
Should animals in Captivity be allowed? Animals in Captivity should be allowed because they get the medicine they need, animals can live longer, and the animals can get smarter. The first reason animals in captivity should be allowed is that animals can get healthy. There are rehabilitation programs that nurse animals back to health.Veterinarians can prevent and control a disease. Second, animals can live longer in captivity. In the article, by Hannah J. O’regan and Andrew C. Kitchener states, “Gorillas live for more than 50 years in captivity compared to 35 years in the wild” (223). The animals diets also help them live longer. Lastly animals can get smarter. Animals in captivity do more activities making them smarter. For example, “Rats raised in enriched environments had larger brains”(O’regan and Kitchener 224). Animals in captivity should be allowed because they are able to get healthier, their lifespan increases, and they get more intelligent.
Have you ever been to a zoo or a wildlife refuge? You have seen the way the animals act for our entertainment. I feel that animals should be left in the wild where they were naturally meant to live. In zoos, they have limited space; some zoos even show cruelty to their animals. Animals are being taken out of their natural habitat only for the owners to make money off of them. I feel strongly that having animals in captivity for human enjoyment is not what God intended to happen.
Animal captivity has been an ongoing debate for over 60 years. There should be no question about whether animal captivity is wrong. “Hundreds of thousands of wild animals across the world are snatched from natural habitats, forced into captivity and subjected to abuse, both mentally and physically, in the name of entertainment and profit.” (World Animal Protection 1) Places such as the circus use abusive training methods such as, hooks, chains, whips, electric rods, and blunt instruments. (Born Free USA 1) Animals deserve to live freely in the wild. Their freedom is taken away the moment they are put in a cage. When animals are brought into
Although keeping animals in captivity is bad because they don't get to be themselves they should keep animals in zoos or captivity because it helps the species not go extinct, it brings happiness to families that go to the zoo, and zoos bring in enough money to build better exhibits. Even though zoos still have negative impacts on animals lives they should still keep animals in
There are animal preservation groups that don’t require putting these wide ranges of species in captivity. Their sole purpose is to help injured animals or species that are going extinct, and release them back into the wild where they belong. I think that zoos should be abolished unless they change into sanctuaries where injured animals are taken in, helped, and released back into the wild immediately. Zoos would still be allowed to do this in front of public eyes. Animals should never be held captive and “research” is never an excuse. Animals can be researched while in the wild where they are in their most natural and happy state. Zoos do not do this. Zoos claim that they are helping animal species when in reality they’re hurting them and torturing animals to the point of depression and insanity. There is no justification for shooting animals when they act up because they shouldn’t be in those situations in the first place. Animal instincts should not change. Wild animals aren’t meant to be ‘tamed’ in order to provide entertainment to the public. Most zoo visitors say they don’t take away any real connection afterwards so zoos really don’t have any righteous or moral
The state of Florida should ban animals in captivity because the animals are mistreated in the zoos and they don't live their life like how their supposed to live it in the wild.
Is it a good idea to put animals in captivity? This is a very controversial subject. You can find many people on both sides I chose to talk about the positive side about putting animals in captivity. Animals should be able to live in zoos because they live longer, they live in a better environment and they get feed better.
In the past few years, a lot of controversy has been going on about whether zoos should be banned or not. Zoos should not be banned as they play a major role in preventing the extinction of some of the species help and in the protection of the animals. “In 1962 a campaign to catch three of the last living Arabic Oryx served to begin a breeding project at the Phoenix Zoo in Arizona.”[1]
“In 2010, a undercover investigator filmed sick animals left untreated and dead animals to rot on floors at Tweddle Farm Zoo”(Captive Animals 5). Leaving animals to rot and die is deadly to the animals around it and can cause deadly disease. Zoos cannot provide the care that animals need, and cannot give anywhere close to amount of space the animals have in the wild, therefore I believe that animals should not be held in captivity.
It has been argued about in Florida about whether they should allow or ban animals to be captured from their natural habitat and kept in zoo.It is evident that yes,the state of Florida should ban the captivity of wild animals.Because the article "Zoos:Myth and Reality" says that animals in zoos live in misery because they don't have their needs met for example the animals in zoos are not able to live in their proper habitat and the animals don't get represented correctly.Also,they say that exhibits are suppose to be for the people but people don't really learn that much from watching them.
Avulsions, abrasions, lacerations, fractures, and blunt force traumas are only a few of the many injuries summated on the autopsy finding of Dawn Brancheau, former SeaWorld trainer. Tilikum, the orca responsible for the death of Brancheau, grabbed ahold of her left forearm, dragged her into the water, and eventually did a barrel roll and pulled her in to the bottom of the concrete tank. The tragedy, due to autopsy reports, was an accident. Tilikum’s agitation captured in video supported the idea that Dawn should not have attempted to try a relationship session, in which the trainer lays down next to the whale in order to build the connection; SeaWorld claims that Tilikum did not attack Dawn, assuring that all evidence indicates that