Banning Cars Essay

As the gas price is rising up to 140 cents per litre in Canada, many people switch their vehicle to gasoline-electric hybrid car to gain savings from the better fuel efficiency. Many potential consumers for hybrid vehicle and hybrid vehicle owners think that the hybrid system is worth the extra penny due to better fuel economy. However, the realistic is that it has higher maintenance despite of its outstanding fuel economy figures. In fact, the hybrids cause more environmental damage than conventional petro powered vehicles and there are better alternatives. Therefore, hybrids should not be on consumers’ shopping list due to a numerous negative facts that consumers are unaware of.

We currently use fossil fuels as are primary source of energy, but they are running out. In addition to that, they pollute, resulting in global warming. Humans have thought of many brilliant ways to save energy and earth, such as hydro electricity, nuclear energy, and windmills. Out technology is related to saving the millions of gallons of fuel used on cars each day by adding solar panels on the roof of a car. We chose this because cars use a lot of fuel. All this use of fuel is bad because we are running out, and we don't want fuel to run our and we are unprepared. Right now, we are using a phone which is slowly running our of battery. Since we have no alternative, we basically have no charger for your phone when battery runs out. According to the United States Energy Information Administration, we use 391.73 million gallons of gasoline a day(On average) in the U.S. alone. That is how quickly we are losing fossil fuels, so we need to run cars in another way.

Another downside is jobs will be lost in bigger cities that have taxis and uber service. Since cars can drive themselves they would be no need for driver service. Thousands of people will be out of a job.

The automobile has had a profound impact on the United States. It has brought us

In the twentieth century, the introduction of the motor vehicle in the United States became not only noteworthy, but also vital in the development of modern American civilization. This technologically complex machine led citizens to vast future dependency on the invention. While mobility was suddenly not limited to alternative, more convoluted options such as railroad stations or bicycles, yet copiously amplified to aid convenience and expanded leisure opportunities.  From auto-racing to redesigning infrastructure, motor vehicles allowed progression, digression, and essentially uttermost change to lifestyles of the American people.

I agree with the youth driving restrictions a 110%. They may have limited the youth but with great reasoning some young drivers are extremely careless and reckless.They don't think about the consequences of there actions when they cause accidents and drink and drive and seriously injure people and themselves. They try to impress other teens by driving fast and recklessly but they are only putting there life and other drivers life in jeopardy.I'm so glad we have restrictions on youth driving its necessary due to the fact that accidents are the number one cause of teenage death in America with restrictions . I don't want to imagine what the world would be like if there weren't restrictions.I think all of the provisions are fair and necessary.An

Even though That the lifted trucks will be less likely to see small vehicles and therefore become more likely to rear end them. , they should not be restricted because it is basically telling a person that you can't drive a big truck because we the government can't because lifted trucks will also have to be more wealthy people because a higher lift would be more expensive causing that person to more likely have insurance and lifted trucks will be more likely to be alert because they are driving a bigger truck. The height of a person is not restricted, So why should the height of a person’s truck be restricted? Cops have pulled over trucks that are majorly big or huge and the cops treat them differently then they would treat a regular car that got pulled over.

Is the automobile still a good thing for America? There’s been a debate going on about whether the automobile is still good for America. I’m not very smart but I do know one thing, it’s not. Rates of car ownership peaked in 2006 and are now declining. The automobile is definitely not good for America. Driving cars pollute the environment, also causes many car crashes, and it cost a lot to maintain the car, here’s why.

Are Americans ready for cars that can drive themselves?, will it be safe for “ai’s” on the road instead of normal human drivers?, and how will this be beneficial to traffic, crashes, and time? In the Newsela article, “pro/con: self-driving cars are just around the corner. Is it a good thing?”, By Tribune News Service, Self-driving cars remove many of the human mistakes that cause injuries and deaths. Self-driving cars can also help disabled and elderly people get from place to place on their own. The self-driving cars that are now being developed use many forms of technology to drive themselves. Radar, cameras and other devices are used to "see" the world around the car. Advanced computer systems drive the car from one destination to another without any help from humans. Self-driving cars offer such a wealth of advantages that it makes little difference whether Americans are ready. Americans need to get ready. Self-driving cars will soon be in their rearview mirrors.

Children are the future of America and the world at large, but as we move these kids up from Kindergarteners all the way up to adults we often overlook the astonishing 25% dropout rate in the United States. There have been many different solutions put forth to solve this but one that is widely used across the country and accepted is the no pass/no drive law. The no pass/no drive law would make it so in high school if you do not attend class often and or fail classes you will get your driver's licence taken as a teenager. Many people are in favor of this law but in truth, a law like this would be a bad idea. I believe that this law would be inadequate, and there are much better solutions than this

I usually do not post stuff like this, but I need to rant. I’m so over all this gun control bullshit. What’s going to happen next? Are people going to start bitching and complaining about banning vehicles? Why do you ask? Because people get drunk and get behind the wheel of a vehicle killing people all the time. When this happens it’s obviously the vehicles fault and not the person driving it. People need to realize that anyone at any time can find a way to hurt and/or kill someone, not just by gun use.

There is a term used in Northern Ontario called White knuckle driving. This is a simple description of what northern drivers experience when they are forced to drive on one of our highways after a snowfall. Our knuckles turn white from gripping the steering wheel so tight because of the life-threatening driving conditions in the North.

Approximately one million people are injured in alcohol-related traffic crashes every year and young people, ages 16 to 24 are involved in 28% of those alcohol-related driving accidents, although they make up only 14% of the U.S. population. On any given weekend evening, one in 10 drivers on America's roads has been drinking and according to the latest statistics, in a family of five the prospect of you or someone in your family being involved in an alcohol-related motor vehicle accident in their lifetime, is an astounding 200 percent. That's a lot of tragic, meaningless deaths that could actually have been avoided.

There is 250 Million American who has a cell phone. Georgia house bill 23 would ban texting and talking drivers who are under 18 years old (Dickensheets N. Pag). Some people think that texting while driving should be unbanned because not everyone would be impaired when performing this task. However I think texting and driving should be banned because it costs too many injuries and death you see on TV and the news that are related to this.

The automobile has had a tremendous impact on society and the environment since its development in the beginning of the 20th century. Today, there are over 500 million motor vehicles on the earth. The automobile's efficiency, style, and performance have changed over the years, but there is one thing that has not - the pollution the automobile generates. Because of the pollution, people find themselves asking whether this technology has helped our society or hurt it. Should the consequences of the automobile be cause to eliminate it? Or should science develop technology to eliminate the pollution caused by the car?