Banning Chemical Weapons In The United States

Frist of all, in the Second Battle of Ypres, the Germans introduced the first use of poisonous gas. When poison gas first introduced it was a popular weapon choice and would be the weapon to change the outcome of the war. The Germans surprisingly attack the Allies, where the used lethal chloride gas against them. The gas was deadly and killed over one thousand soldiers. (1) It also allowed a significant advanced for the Germans in the war. The gas usage continued to grow throughout the war. In the end, many Allied countries started chemical weapons research. Gas warfare became common but effective actions were used to protect the troops. After World War 1, poison was use for a while but in today’s war it is no longer allowed. Instead of poisonous gas, chemical warfare is used. Chemical weapons come in a variety of forms and are used for several different techniques.

One of the new weapons used in WWI was poison gas. Poison gas was first used by the french in 1914, they used them to fight against the germans. After the french the germans started to study it and we the first to use it in a big scale. They used chlorine gas caused irritation and aggressive sneezing. There are many types of poisonous gas like chlorine gas, phosgene (causes violent coughing, choking and eventually death), and Mustard gas (nearly odorless chemical that causes internal and external blisters for hours). The total amount of casualties for poison gases are 1,240,853 people and total deaths are 91,198 people.

Chemical usage and experimentation has always been an extremely vague subject back during Word War !!. However, I.G. Farben's gas chamber was able to produce deadly Zyklon B Gas that was used in the gasing of Jews in concentration camp of Auschwitz. This brand new technology at the time provided the Nazis with a quick and efficient way to kill off Jews fast, as there

The Germans marked an epoch with chemical warfare during World War I. The horror that opposing countries experienced when being exposed to the merciless gas forced them to begin to concoct their own weapons, so they could compete with the Germans and their allies. David Cook, author of Chemical Warfare: World War I, explains the purpose of chemical weapons during the war was to cause enemy casualties, enfeeble the opposing troops’ ability to retaliate, briefly block the land that they are no longer able to defend in order to escape, and create chaos in the enemy’s lines. Chemical warfare allowed attackers using this weapon to have a major advantage over their enemies, resulting in the successful execution of missions and casualties with its toxicity. The strength and versatility was not the only cause of chaos during the introduction of chemical weapons by the Germans during World War I; twenty-six countries had made an agreement previous to the war to prohibit the use of asphyxiating or deleterious gases (“Hague Peace Conferences (1899 and

Of the five types of WMD’s that I have chosen to highlight for this assignment, three fall under Biological warfare, while the other two fall under chemical warfare.

Since one of the primary chemicals, Methylphosphonyl difluoride, is classified as a Schedule 1 chemical under the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC), there are very strict reporting requirements for its manufacture and sale. In addition to tracking the sale and movement of the chemicals used to produce Sarin, there are other signs to look for that can draw the interest of local authorities. The requirements of the CWC describe two categories of Schedule 1 chemical production activities that are not prohibited –

Have you ever heard, seen on the news, or even witness hundreds of innocent people shot dead during little celebrations and events? Yeah that is traumatizing, traumatizing to even think of, so just imagine being there while all of this is occurring. Only one person in this world has the power to change that and preventing it from happening, our president, Donald Trump. Most of us think in our heads, why can they not just ban assault rifles so us civilians do not have to worry about this happening. Banning assault rifles would create so much relief regarding safety because if the government were to ban them, that ability to go on mass shootings would not be occurring because of the fact that hand weapons have less bullets and mainly are

Banning nuclear weapons may sound like a good idea, but what if all nuclear weapons were banned only to have one country secretly develop and launch one? How would the rest of the world fight against them? The bad guys by definition don’t follow the rules. Nuclear weapons can also be good for more than just attacking; they may even save lives by one country having possession of them. They can also give a country more negotiating power. Nuclear weapons were first developed in America because of Albert Einstein’s letter to F.D.R. telling him about the Germans’ attempts to make a missile powerful enough to “destroy an entire port and some of the surrounding territory.” F.D.R. then got together a group of scientists to develop one first. The

Chemical weapons in the form of liquid were not the only type of chemicals used in the beginning of human history. The earliest recorded use of gas warfare in the West dates back to the 5th century BC, during the Peloponnesian War between Athens and Sparta. Spartan forces besieging an Athenian city placed a lighted mixture of wood, pitch, and sulfur under the walls hoping that the noxious smoke would incapacitate the Athenians, so that they would not be able to resist the assault that followed. Sparta wasn't alone in its use of unconventional tactics during these wars: Solon of Athens is said to have used hellebore roots to poison the water in an aqueduct leading from the Pleistrus River around 590 BC during the siege of

The purpose of this essay is to deal with the fact that chemical warfare should be brought back to modern warfare strategies. As Warren Rudman said, “And they will tell you unequivocally that if we have a chemical or biological attack or a nuclear attack anywhere in this country, they are unprepared to deal with it today, and that is of high urgency.” Rudman’s words are true in what they say and that we should do everything to counter-act his statement. Biological weapons are a key to outstanding success in war and therefore, I strongly suggest that chemical warfare is an effective and producible weapon tactic that can be used on today’s battlefield.

These are just a few examples of many accounts of the use of chemical and biological agents in war.

Biological/Chemical weapons are the type of weapons that should not be used in a time of war. When using these weapons there capable of killing most of the people that are in the area where the weapon has been used. These weapons are capable of killing thousand possible millions, in other word any living organism that is in the area. There also the possibility of killing people that aren't even in the war they might just be in the area.

Chemical weapons are toxic gases, which use in the wars such as World War 1. Chemical weapons used in First World War and they killed a lot of people even children. In addition, chemical weapons are unless color, so people can’t see them. Also, most of people who died through the First World War were civilians. Therefore, who were responsible about them? In addition, people who survived had dangerous and permanent diseases such as cancer, asthma … etc. Even people’s genes effected by these toxic gases and they cause a lot of genetic problems that appeared in a second generation. Even soldiers who were pushed to this war. Then, they died or effected who were responsible about their families. In addition chemical weapons burned a lot of trees and they changed plant characteristics. Also, these gases can react with others to change air and weather characteristics. Therefore, chemical weapons effect on our

The next question that will be discussed and answered is how chemical weapons affect society today? Society has played an important role in the farming of the regimen against chemical weapons. The recent developments in Syria once again brought to attention the grave danger associated with the very existence of chemical weapons. Following the adoption of the Biological Weapons Convention of 1972, work towards the BWC began what is today known as the Conference on Disarmament. Since 1974, the International Pugwash Movement has been organizing workshops to discuss policy, legal and technical issues of the disarmament of chemical weapons. In 1989, the National Government Industry Conference against chemical weapons in Canberra which underlined the full support that the worlds chemical industry for a global ban on chemical weapons. A productive relationship has evolved between the OPCW, Scientific Advisory Board and the International Union for the applied chemistry IUPAC bringing valuable scientific input to the OPCW.

During past decades Americans have become more familiar with terms such as weapons of mass destruction. This term in particular set off an atmosphere of fear as well as devastation in a person’s mind. Such instruments are often referred to chemical bombs, radiation, or anthrax. These are weapons can cause mass casualties. This paper will attempt to explain the types of weapons of mass destruction that are often deployed in the world today. Further it will expand on the protocol implemented by the United States government in order to combat the use of these weapons of mass destruction. Furthermore, this work will explore current practices to detour the future use as well as production of such massive arms by other nations. Finally, it will define what could occur if the world collective does not adapt a national agreement when dealing with such devices.