Banning Soda Essay

As an attempt to reduce the rising obesity and obesity-related disease rates, Mayor Bloomberg of New York City has proposed a ban on soft drinks larger than 16 oz. According to an infographic created by the Huffington Post, extra large soft drinks have accounted for an average of 301 extra calories in people’s diets across the US. Although measures need to be put into place to improve the unhealthy diets and lifestyles of many Americans, a ban on large soft drinks is not the solution. The ban on soda would be an ineffective attempt at reducing obesity and obesity-related diseases, as well as an infringement of civil liberties and an attack on businesses in New York City.

The ban on larger sodas would only make people buy more than one soda to satisfy their cravings as they do not like being told what they can and can not have. In 2013, in response to the ban, The Daily Signal reported “Mayor Bloomberg and the Board of Health seek to use their power to change consumer behavior. This assumes that citizens are ignorant and must be protected from themselves.” This agrees with the above statement of the people not liking being told what they can and can not do, or have. Another thing people may argue is that the ban is for people to be able to be healthier and still have soda. CNN News reports that “One of those solutions is to control portion size and sugar consumption.” While this is true the ban would only be subjective to places such as movie theaters, sports venues, restaurants, and places that people visit every once in a blue moon. The Huffington Post reports, “It's also important to look at where people acquire such large drinks. … Such neighborhood stores selling over 50 percent food products fall under the jurisdiction of the City's Department of Health, and therefore would be limited by the ban. Those selling under 50 percent food products would be exempt from the ban.” This basically states that convenience stores, supermarkets, and gas stations would not be subjective to the ban so people could just go to one of these places to get larger sodas therefore finding a way around the ban. This subjectiveness of the ban would not only make the ban inefficient but would also cost the city by stores and other places that fall under the jurisdiction of the ban having to cut workers, which then causes the state to have to create more programs for poorer city

For starters,if you do tax soda is will not effective some people.If you do add taxes to soda it obesity won’t end.Also if you add taxes to soda people will not make any better choices and also since people won’t make better choices people can find other stuff that they will enjoy and then they have to tax that as well until everything is taxed.People can find other sugary drinks if they tax soda.People can just buy energy drinks that does not taste bad and they can just drink that instead of soda if they tax soda.

Against: Did you hear about the new soda tax? Now we pay extra tax on sugary drinks and iced teas. They make you pay extra cents per ounce!

In conclusion, there is nothing healthy about diet soda and it is simply water with artificial sweeteners and other additives, especially phosphoric acid. So the less soda you drink, the better. In addition, people should not keep sodas in their home such as refrigerator because it is a big temptation. Instead, people can put healthier options include fresh juice, low fat milk, green tea, hot chocolate, and ginger tea. Moreover, people should drink more water instead of reaching for diet soda. Liquid helps human’s body get rid of toxins that can cause a big risk for diseases like cancer. As you know, water has zero calories so it is one of the healthiest ways for people to stay hydrated. According to my research, people should drink at least

As Americans we should have a choice on what we drink and put into our bodies and not be told by lawmakers what to do.

Will consuming only 16 oz. of soda make you skinnier? Of course, assuming you won’t buy a higher amount from vending machines, super-markets, or convenience stores. Well, this is what the controversial soda ban introduced by Mr. Bloomberg is proposing, an unsuccessful quest to reduce obesity rates in New York by limiting the amount of soda per customer. A ban that also is indirectly threatening the soda industry including small businesses, which might lead to job losses. Despite all the positive outcomes that this ban might generate overtime, restricting New York’s consumers from buying large sizes of the sugary drinks would not prove an effective way of guiding Americans into eating healthy, healthy living should rather be properly taught and practiced across the country.

Soda banning is one of the uttermost debatable and controversial topics in the country. One of the questions that people are asking is should soda be banned? The soda ban is the best way to go to eradicate obesity in the country. It will lower the risks for diabetes, cancer, and death. If we banned it, we will save people from the ramifications of their health. More importantly, the economy could increase and create numerous jobs for out of work people. However, if the ban does happen diet soda won’t be a part of the ban even though it consists of a dangerous chemical, aspartame. Furthermore, if we banned it, we might be taking away a citizen's right to drink whatever they crave whenever they please. That being the case, the biggest

Even further, a ban isn’t effective. Think back to prohibition. People find loopholes, and when something as popular as a large soda is effectively banned, people will resist it. The loopholes here aren’t even grandiose, either. All a person has to do is either buy multiple smaller sized drinks, or go to an establishment that isn’t regulated (Thinkprogress). This won’t do anything to stop the obesity epidemic- it doesn’t show people what the problem is and how to avoid it. All the soda ban does is poorly attempt to nanny adults who are accustomed to making their own

We can be healthier by doing small things, getting the zero calorie option instead of the regular option. Or if the restaurant owners can afford it they can get one of those cool machines with the option with no sugar or no calories. Yes, soda does have a lot of sugar and calories but so does candy and ice cream. So why are we singling out soda? It’s like saying we can’t have soda at school because it has too much sugar but we can have as much M&M chocolate chip cookies as we like. That has just about the same health benefits to soda. If the government want kids to be healthy instead of putting more taxes on the soda they should just trust the parents to limit the kids. So instead of taxing the soda, the government should just only let restaurants sell small cups like a 5 ounce instead of a 15-ounce cup. Adults should also be mature enough to know the limits. If too many people stop drinking soda the soda companies will completely go out of business. Even the government and all the people who want to add taxes to soda think they want soda completely eliminated, but every once and awhile is okay to get a can of soda. But if the government completely takes out soda, there would be no” Let’s go get some soda to replenish our minds and then we can think again.” People could also walk to the place there and back home if they are talking about healthy. If the government wanted all

Although most nutritionists know that soda has contributed to the obesity epidemic, I hate the idea of banning things, because it infringes on personal liberties. Should we ban Netflix because binge television watching is linked to obesity? It would be better to concentrate on public education though the schools and public service announcements on media. Advertisement by soda companies that target children could be regulated and/or reduced, as has been done with cigarette advertisements. Parents and the schools should protect children – with no soda served at schools and not allowed in vending machines. Adults should have access to legal items, and make decisions for themselves.

The government has had crazy ideas and ridiculous proposes. But I believe that this one particular idea isn’t that bad. The Government believes in trying to ban candy and sda from schools. In the article I read from (The New York times Upfront, Vol. 142, May 10, 2010). There were two sides on this proposal. One saying that they should not ban candy and soda and another saying that they should. Both sides of this debate had really well thought out arguments on why they should or shouldn’t be banned. Before I had read this article, I had already been convinced on saying no to the proposal. But when I was reading the arguments on why they should ban candy and soda, I was really convinced.

I agree that despite the fact that sugary drinks leads to obesity and diabetes, the restaurateurs and retailers, including the transnational corporations such as Coca-Cola, PepsiCo, and McDonalds, continue to oppose this legislation in order to increase their profits. Though New York has the 12th lowest obesity rate in the nation, the adult obesity rate has increased from 17.1 in 2000 to 27 percent currently.1 This proves that obesity is still on the rise and that it is about time to take actions to prevent the complications of obesity. However, limiting the size of a drink would not prevent obesity. The government cannot improve the health of an individual by limiting their food. Individuals have to choose their own lifestyle. Until the individual

The first step to making any change is gaining self-awareness of a problem. I have become aware that my daily consumption of soda is not beneficial to my health. I am physically picking up a glass, can, or bottle that contains soda and drinking it, which satisfies my craving for a carbonated, caffeinated beverage. The most important factor resulting in my soda consumption is that I do not receive an adequate amount of water on a daily basis, causing a degree of dehydration. This is the reason for increasing water intake as part of my behavior modification. Another problem with my soda consumption is that I am noticing my teeth do not feel as healthy as they did before, the enamel feels

It seems that over the last 10 years, there has been campaigns that promote different studies showing soft beverages or carbonated beverages are unhealthy and cause a lot of problems to individuals. Cities, in order to tackle public health, especially childhood obesity, have made efforts of to ban or tax carbonated beverages. Although some may not have been successful, such as New York City or Philadelphia, it shows the public that soda is not a healthy product. In a recent article by Sanger-Katz, she explains that over the last 20 years, the sales