Barack Obama's Home Page and Mitt Romney's Website: An Analysis

In the two speeches Obama and Trump, both of them dressed well but Obama had a better body language and Trump had a lack of body language. Even though both are presidents they are different, Trump had lack of sentences while Obama new what had to say. When they were talking Trump was serious and nervous, meanwhile Obama was enjoyable and also friendly even

Both point of views draw in different people to side with the two former candidates, leading into the popular, and electoral votes. For Donald, there is of course lots of controversy on popular and electoral votes, rigging the system with Russia, etc. Trump had a total of 62,979,636 votes losing to Clinton in the 2016 race for presidency. But the thing that “matters the most” (not the people of America) but the electoral votes, pushed Trump to presidency. In the 2008 presidential vote, Obama gained 69,498,516 votes outnumbering his competition, John McCain by almost 10 million. Also, outnumbering McCain by electoral votes (365-173). To sum up, Obama and Trump have a lot of differences, differences that I could continue on listing if I didn't have to get on the the similarities.

The current election between Barrack Obama and challenger Mitt Romney is about America's future based upon different visions. To fully understand these contrasting views requires examining the stance of each individual in areas such as: the candidate's vision of America, how they differ, the way they are similar and their beliefs on health care / job creation. Together, these elements will highlight the approach they will be utilizing to address a host of problems.

Find a Way (Romney for President, Inc., 2012) was perhaps the best ad of the campaign. It addressed the major concerns that effected Americans at time, national debt, unemployment, presidential challenges with the House and Congress and at the same time showed that Romney was successful addressing similar issues at the state level. Unfortunately, that was probably the only Republican campaign ad that Americans would relay to; however, a curtail mistake later on was a major contribution to Romney’s lost and a great pro for the Obama

With the presidential election coming to a close, the campaigns of Hilary Clinton and Donald Trump are doing their best to attract voters now more than ever. The question is, who will be more successful? When analyzed in detail the Hilary Clinton campaign is appealing to their targeted audience in a way that makes her campaign more successful.

Romney’s ad talks about how his leadership will be once he becomes a president of the United States. The ad starts with the questions to persuade an audience, “What will be different about Romney Presidency?”. Romney intends to show enthusiasm toward the decided Republican voters and to sway the decisions of those that are undecided.

Watching out for the economy. Regardless of getting derailed by second hand issues now and again, Romney and his group moved into conflict by talking specifically to voters in addresses and ads about employments, medicinal services, the obligation and shortages. Romney confined the race by highlighting his record as an information driven turnaround craftsman who best saw how to invert the U.S's. lazy monetary development and high unemployment rate. What's more, Romney shut solid, beginning with the Great Debate, giving the best discourses of his vocation,

In their National Convention speech, both Michelle Obama and Melania Trump used rhetorical conventions to persuade the audience to elect their husbands as the next President of the United States. To begin with, both women use ethos to show the audience that their husbands are capable of becoming the next president. Both women build credibility on their husbands by voicing admirable qualities each of them have. For example, Michelle Obama states that Barack Obama is a very smart, caring, dignified, and respectful man. On the other hand, Melania Trump proclaimed that Donald Trump has great patriotism, leadership, and loyalty. All these qualities show that both presidential candidates are well suited in becoming the president. Michelle Obama and Melania Trump don’t just state that their husbands possess these qualities; they give evidence of these qualities through the use of ethos.

The media is able to show only want they want to show and how they want it to affect the viewer. Not only do the voters have doubts about the candidate, Romney has doubts about himself and if he can truly take on the role of President. Sarah Beauchamp wrote for the Huffington Post about how Romney considered himself a “flawed candidate”, because he has a reputation of being a flip-flopper, and how the film does not directly approach this. Whiteley instead took the approach to show how even though Romney had these flaws, Romney still continued and tried his best. “I was impressed by his stamina through all the rigors of the campaign” the director continued.

Contrast of presidential *campaign positions of McCain and Obama. From year to year, presidential elections face many controversial problems that involve candidates’ personality and ideas, and they have a great influence on voters’ decisions. Many journalists and politicians express their feelings about upcoming presidential elections in provocative articles, revealing accomplishments of one and limitations of another, but the only right way to find out who our candidates are, and what are their real intentions, is to let them turn their ideas into life. Just remember the words of President George Bush during the 2000 campaign about building a nation. His position was very clear and stated that it is none of the government’s business, and

Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, both Democratic nominees, have the same views on many things. Obama ran for president in 2008 and in 2012 and won both the elections, Clinton ran for the 2016 elections and lost to republican nominee, Donald Trump. Many democrats share the same opinion on things such as abortions, immigrants and health care.

The election between Clinton, the Democratic nominee, and Republican nominee Donald Trump was a greatly consequential one that strongly captured my interest, especially since I was now eligible to vote. I was excited at the prospect of the highest and hardest glass ceiling in the United States to finally be shattered, however, following Clinton’s surprise defeat from her rival Trump, the glass ceiling has been left intact. Throughout the course of the election, I had personally heard several remarks regarding Clinton’s gender and how it impacted one’s vote choice. Some of these remarks included that women are “too emotional” to hold such a position, and that it would be emasculating for a man to vote for a woman. Retrospectively looking at this past election cycle has brought my aforementioned research question to the forefront for me and has made me question just how much of an impact a candidate’s gender can have over vote choice in a United States presidential election. This is an important question to be researched as it can assist in addressing just how prevalent sexism and misogyny are in the country today. Women make up approximately 51% of the country’s population meaning that factors such as sexism directly affect over half of the population. In addition, Clinton’s gender may have assisted in

I really enjoyed reading your post because it clarifies what I stated in mine. As you said above, the Republicans are more towards the whole, rather than the Democrats that are toward to the each one of us. I kind of see the slight difference between the two parties but what also surprised me is that they have a lot of similarities, in which sometimes it feels like that they believe in the same thing.

During the 2008 election, George Bush had completed his second term in office, leaving two fresh faces to run for President of the United States. Barrack Obama, an Illinois Senator, was running for the Democrats and Republican John McCain, an Arizona Senator. During Obama’s first term election, the Democratic party used the ongoing conflicts in Iraq as their central issue of the campaign. The slogan of “candidate for change” was used by Barrack Obama since the Republicans had held the presidential seat for the past 8 years. Now in Obama’s reelection year, Mitt Romney’s campaign tactics consisted of using Obama’s own statements against him. This commercial really struck a nerve with many Americans when they saw it http://www.livingroomcandidate.org/commercials/2012/these-hands. Again negative tactics against the opposing candidate take precedence over what they can do for our

For a long period, candidates running for President of the United States often have what’s called a campaign strategy to help attract voters’ attention. The more voters they attracted, more likely those voters would choose them as their president elect. Technology has played a key role in doing that for past elections and current ones. During