Barbara Fredrickso Psychology

Stephanie Fryberg’s research interests focus on how social representation of race, culture and social class influence psychological well-being, and educational attainment. Fryberg is currently an associate professor in American Indian Studies and Psychology. She previously worked as an associate professor of psychology and affiliate faculty member in American Indian Studies at the University of Arizona. Rebecca Covarrubias earned a Bachelor of Science and a Master's and Ph.D. in Social Psychology from The University of Arizona. Dr. Covarrubias is currently a lab director and assistant professor at for the Department of Psychology at the University of California, Santa Cruz (UCSC).

person both in her own time and in psychology’s history” (Goodman, 1980, pg. 5, para.

Lyubomirsky defines happiness as the “experience of joy, contentment, or positive well-being, combined with a sense that one’s life is good, meaningful, and worthwhile” (184). She challenges the myths that people can find happiness by changing their circumstances and that people either are “born happy or unhappy” (186). Happiness is not something that can be found or something that not everyone can have. People make their own happiness, despite the difficulties they may face. Happiness comes by “choosing to change and manage your state of mind” (185). Lyubomirsky gives cases of people who are happy even though they suffer from losses and setbacks. These are the people whose circumstances should make them unhappy, but their intentional actions bring them joy. She also gives cases of people who have not suffered any major losses but are still unhappy because they may see events negatively and feel helpless before them. Lyubomirsky asserts that “changes in our circumstances, no matter how positive and stunning, actually have little bearing on our well-being” (186). Even though a person’s circumstances may be positive, those circumstances do not make them happy. Lyubomirsky uses a Subjective Happiness Scale to measure happiness, which takes the average of numerical answers to four questions. She argues that in order to become happier, “you need to determine your present personal happiness level, which will provide your first estimate of your happiness

Margaret Floy Washburn was born on July 25, 1871 in New York City to parents Reverend Francis and Elizabeth Floy Washburn. She was born in a time when women were not allowed to display any type of power, higher reasoning, or desire for higher education. At the age of seven, she began her educational journey in the home of a retired Presbyterian minister who lived next door to her family. In 1886, she graduated from high school at the young age of 15 years old. Upon completion of high school, she attended Vassar College where she studied Chemistry and French. However, by the time she had graduated her educational interests had changed to philosophy and science, which

From the perspective of positive psychology, there is a well-being formula invested by Martin Seligman to achieve a higher well-being. Martin Seligman (2010) defined as happiness: H (to maintain the length of happiness) = S (happy range breadth) + V (you can control the factors) + C (your living environment). Happy length: the distinction between "temporary" happy and "persistent" happy. Temporary happiness can be achieved by food, comedy, bunch of flowers. While the persistence of happiness is mainly affected by genetic, and this genetic trait can be changed. The breadth of happiness: psychologists think that we are born with a happy constant point, like a thermometer. If there is a happier thing, even if we are upset, it will be dedicated

Achor utilizes a meta-analysis, or the combination of different findings, of over 200 scientific studies to prove his overall theory that happiness leads to success in almost every aspect of life from family to friends to careers and businesses. He does not rely solely on the data or information from a few relevant case studies, but instead relies upon experimental research to support his claim. He utilizes his findings to create “The Seven Principles”, which are “patterns that predict success and achievement” (Achor, 17), which is headed by “The Happiness Advantage.” He utilizes the concept of positive psychology and neurological activity to showcase the point that we can “retrain our brains to

Happiness is one of the most significant dimensions of human experience. Many people can argue that happiness is a meaningful and desirable entity. Studies indicate that everyone pursues happiness in various aspects of their life. Our four fathers saw happiness as a need, so they made the pursuit of happiness as one of the three unalienable rights branded in the Declaration of Independence. There is a sense of complexity behind the meaning of happiness; its definition is not definite. Think of happiness as a rope; there are many thin fiber strands bonded together to become the strength of the rope. Like the analogy of the rope, there are numerous factors that can contribute to an individual’s overall happiness in life. This study is going to

Virginie Silla’s movie Lucy is what would call absurd, so only a few people actually take the time to watch it. Lucy, a twenty four year old female who is over-seas studying in Taipei, Taiwan. It is surely a different way of thinking, because it expands your mind more than imaginable. The movie shows us what it would be like to be able to expand our minds to a hundred percent and all the “superpowers” we would have. The drug that is portrayed in the movie is what makes Lucy such an amazing human.

Brenda Pulido is a freshman student at California State University, Stanislaus and is currently majoring in psychology. Pulido received her High School diploma from Livingston High, in Livingston,Califormia. Pulido chose to go to CSU Stanislaus to stay close by to her family, while in the meantime have her own individual space. Pulido dreams of owning her own office as a psychologist. Pulido is very fascinated by the study of the mind, she would like to further understand the functions and behavior of the human mind. Even though she thinks she is the least creative person you'll ever meet, she wants to inspire those around her, as she states “I want to be remembered as a very helpful person that contributed to society.” Pulido is known to be smart, shy, and very dedicated to her academics.

In this video, Achor (2011)discusses how instead of simply trying to help or cure individuals with some problem in their life, positive psychology tries to take average people and find ways to reach their full potential. Many people believe that if they change the circumstances in their environment, they can generate greater amounts of happiness and well-being in their lives. Achor (2011) maintains that only about ten percent of long term happiness can be predicted by the external world, a whopping ninety percent is dependent upon what happens within our minds; and by changing the way people process the world around them, it can ultimately change how they perceive reality. Approximately twenty-five percent of job success can be predicted by

Even if we use the word “happiness” on daily basis, has anyone ever tried to define it? It’s harder than it seems. When do you feel happy? How is it when you feel happy? Is there any way to understand how much happiness to you experience? This is the main hypothesis of this paper – Can happiness or wellbeing be measured? And if it can be measured, how do we measure it? Happiness is feeling pleasure and enjoyment because of your life, situation (Meriam Webster). Pleasure and enjoyment are very subjective and means different things to different people. This is where the term subjective wellbeing comes from. There are a lot of things that can be included when measuring wellbeing. Various studies have been conducted to assess wellbeing and how does it affect other factors. For example Earlstin(1995) and later on Ferrer-i-Carbonell(2005) have examined the relationship between income and happiness. Gruber(2004) studies the relationship cigarette taxation and happier smokers. Richard, Clark, Gerogellis and Diener(2004) analyze the effect of unemployment on wellbeing.

People can train their brain to scan for the positive and become experts at capitalizing on Happiness Advantage (Achor 91)

In the beginning of the movie Sara Goldfarb has not experience any psychological symptoms. Sara is a lonely widow who lives by herself, she suffers from missing her late husband and wishing she receive more visits from her son Harry more often. As well as Mrs. Goldfarb is addicted to watching a lot of television. Which causes Sara to have such eagerness in losing a few pounds. In falling prey to a doctor who then prescribes weight loss pills. The doctor doesn't even take two seconds into listening to Sara without just prescribing her medication taking in to factor her age or mental state in life.

Calkins devoted much of her research to the concept of the self in psychology. She believed that the self is a conscious and mobile force in the context of psychology. Calkins identified self psychology as the study of the conscious organism, focusing on the subject (or self), the object, and the relationship between the two.She established one of the first psychological laboratories in the country at Wellesley College, she published four books and over a hundred papers in psychology and philosophy. Mary Whiton Calkins was the 14th President of APA and the first woman to serve in that office. Calkins spent a large part of her career developing a system of scientific self psychology to which she was ardently committed. Calkins based her system

Positive psychology, which has emerged recently, is the scientific study of human thriving. Psychology traditionally focuses on dysfunction—on people with mental illness or other psychological problems and how to treat them. Positive psychology, by contrast, is a relatively new field that examines how ordinary people can become happier and more fulfilled. In his 1998 APA presidential address, Seligman, the founder of positive psychology, argued that psychology had become too focused on curing mental illness according to a disease model, and that, for all intents and purposes, it had become a “victimology” (Seligman, 1998). What was needed, he averred, was a new “science of human strengths,” a positive psychology (Seligman & Csikszentmihalyi, 2000).