Barriers To Technology

The use of technology in the classroom is an important tool to utilize as an educator. Technology allows for educators to have instant access to a plethora of resources that would not be available if technology was not used in the classroom. Teachers have the ability to plan lessons, create presentations, and have interactive games for students to use as a learning tool through the use of different digital devices. Modern day technology is rapidly advancing and providing teacher with many different tools to use in the classroom to enhance the students learning experience.

Teachers can use technology within the classroom to assist with providing instructional guidance and education to students. However, the use of technology in the classroom has both its advantages and

Technology in the classroom is important for teachers, parents, and students alike, because technology use has become a necessary skill for survival in today’s vastly expanding technology driven global economy. Research has shown an increase in student’s success rates when exposed to technology in the classroom. Also technology has opened lines of communication between educators and parents to keep students on track, and help teachers educate better.

Incorporating technology in the classroom is a leading trend among educators in the 21st century. Teacher use classroom websites, technology tools, and online web assessments to keep parents and students informed, improve instruction, and individualize learning. Using technology to support communication helps keep both students and parents informed on what is happening in the classroom and the students’ academic progress. Integrating technology in the classroom helps increase student engagement and participation. Students use technology tools to help reinforce instruction and teachers may use it as a form of remediation. Technology can also help with differentiating instruction with the use of online assessments. Incorporating technology in the classroom can increase students’ success in the classroom and beyond.

The first set of questions were used to see what technology teachers use and how often they use them. The seven different devices that were surveyed are computers, smart boards, mobile devices, tablets/iPads, digital cameras, clickers, and televisions/projectors. Each device was rated based on use either daily, weekly, monthly, yearly, or never. Using this data we can see which devices are used most and least by teachers. These charts also show us which devises teachers and students are most familiar with in the classroom. The most significant statistic from this first set of questions is that 91% of teachers use computers daily and weekly in the classroom (Fig.

In the articles “What Is The Future Of Technology In Education?” by Matt Britland and “New Class(room) War: Teacher vs Technology” by Samuel G. Freedman, two different viewpoints are expressed toward technology integration education. The authors show the implications of technology on the attitudes of teachers and students. Britland and Freedman agree that technology and theoretical framework are two inseparable facets but propose different solutions to the actions that should be taken to result in pedagogical expertise.

The biggest problem with today’s education is how rapid technology is advancing. So rapid, in fact, that schools are attempting to keep up, but are sadly falling short. Teachers are being required to incorporate new technology into their everyday methods of teaching. The use of IPads or laptops in classrooms can be helpful to both teachers and students(edreform online classes)”. If a teacher is not overly familiar with the new devices, then the students will lose what little time they have to learn. As a teacher is attempting to fix technical problems in one class, the class that has a tech savvy teacher will be advancing far ahead. On the other hand, if a classroom is full of students who are very unfamiliar with the technology will have to be taught how to operate it, which wastes valuable time. In today’s society technology usage is so much more widespread than it was just five years ago. The new toys can allow schools to broaden their curriculum. Since most work can be done on a single device, kids can work at their own pace and potentially reach heights they could never reach with book, pen, and paper. The benefits of this new tech greatly outweigh the downsides. The biggest problem with technology in classrooms is their lack of use. So few schools have jumped on board with these programs, and therefore are holding their kids back. These products are readily available, but “the use of new technology

The first component of this multiyear plan is to create the short-term goal of assessing and improving accessibility of technology because “Inadequate access to and/or underutilization of instructional technology impedes students’ learning” (Ford & Moore, 2013, p. 407). The “digital divide” that exists among schools is a notable factor and this could help narrow the disparities among student achievement (Ford & Moore, 2013). Therefore, in a two-month timeframe, administrators and the school leadership team would determine the infrastructure of existing technology and analyze funding options for immediate and future needs. This strategy not only enhances the equitable use of technology in the classroom; which affects the school’s accountability ratings, it also provides an evaluation tool to document student achievement. The next step involves the principal collaborating with the Information Technology (IT)

In “Technology in Today’s Classroom: Are You a Tech-Savvy Teacher?”, Stephanie Hicks successfully argues, using primarily logical evidence, that teachers should integrate technology into education. Hicks begins by stating, “In today’s classroom technology abounds and students are extremely tech savvy,” using this claim to justify the need for teachers to implement the use of technology (188). Her statement regarding students and their technological knowledge logically introduces the argument because of its easily observable nature. In addition, because students have a sense of familiarity and experience with computers, it follows that the use of such technology would suit their educational needs. Hicks begins her argument by countering the

In general, most K–12 academic settings today utilizes technology for educational and non-academic use (Helms, 2014). Researchers agree that budgeting can share a significant impact on classroom technology integration because many schools do not have the funds to pay for teacher training and all of the cost associated with maintaining technology resources (Blackwell, 2014; Chou et al., 2012; Helms, 2014). The lack of adequate technology training, support and funding can also influence teachers’ attitudes (Kirkwood et al, 2014). A gap appears to exit in empowering teachers with technology skills to implement an interactive learning experience for all learning styles (Helms, 2014).

The data collected was from three different teachers each within three different socioeconomic status schools. Teacher A teaches kindergarten to third grade learning support at a middle socioeconomic status school. Teacher B teaches third grade at a high socioeconomic status school, and Teacher C teaches kindergarten at a low socioeconomic status school. When analyzing the research, it was determined that sixty-seven percent of teachers interviewed said that they personally use 3-5 hours of technology on a daily basis. This includes times when they are using technology with the students, as well as times when they are using it to send emails or look up information and ideas. Students are in school for 6 hours a day. Therefore, studies show that the resources available within the schools are being actively utilized. The data shows that technology use is primarily occurring more throughout the school day than it is in the homes. Within 14 hour day that students and teachers may be awake, approximately half of the day is involving technology of some sort. This means that we are integrating technology as an additional way of learning. However, it also means that we may be taking away from other learning styles that are already proven to work. Technology use can also take away from social skills and interactions.

Technology is everywhere, it is involved in almost every part of our culture. It affects how we live, work, play, and most importantly learn. With technology being such a fundamental part of our lives and growing each day, it only makes sense that schools incorporate technology in the classrooms. Even though many people support the use of technology in schools, there are those that have concerns about the effectiveness of technology and whether or not it undermines education to solely prepare students for the workforce. Despite the concerns, technology is being integrated with classroom lessons daily, and proving how beneficial it is for student success.

Across the United State, large sums of money are invested to integrate new technologies in schools (Al-Zaidiyeen, Mei & Fook, 2010). Data suggest that educational technology (ET) expense will continue to rise at a steady pace (Johnstone & Poulin, 2010). Schools tend to lack an understanding of important factors that improve the use and adoption of ET in the classroom. Urban schools in particular have worked to improve access to technology in the classroom by closing the digital divided. However, as Peggy Ertmer and Anne Ottenbreit-Leftwich (2010) suggest, ET is not being adopted or used to support the kind of instruction that is required to help students in urban schools. Ertmer and Ottenbreit-Leftwich, suggest that teacher mindset must change

For example, there has been admirable improvements in the level of access to technology in schools severing predominantly minority and L-SES student populations; however, students in these classrooms still have significantly less access to technology (Barton & Coley, 2009). Besides, the use of technology in innovative manners that effectively supports teacher’s instructional objectives is still infrequent, even in L-SES schools with increased access to computer technology (Ertmer, & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, 2010). As a result of budgetary restraints, L-SES schools have less access to the kind of full-time technical support needed to maintain school technology. Therefore, teachers are apprehensive about incorporate technology into their lesson plans due to unreliable machines and untimely technical support (Warschauer, & Matuchniak, 2010). Unfortunately, along with technology shortfalls, schools serving minority and L-SES students also have fewer certified teachers in their classrooms (Barton & Coley, 2009; Clotfelter, Ladd & Vigdor, 2010). In fact, students from underserved populations are more likely to be taught math by teachers lacking focused degree training in mathematics (Barton & Coley, 2009). There is strong evidence demonstrating a long-term patterns of failure related to teacher quality, including economic models that linking the impact of teacher proficiency and dramatically stunted

As we navigate through the 21st century, technology in the classroom is becoming further predominant. iPads are replacing our textbooks, and we can research any desired topic on our smartphones. The impact that technology has had on today’s schools has been utterly momentous. Educators have now seen firsthand the numerous benefits of technology in the classroom. According to a study by IT Trade Association CompTIA, around 75 percent of educators have come to the conclusion that technology has a positive impact on the education process. Educators have also recognized the significance of developing these technological skills in students so they will be prepared to enter the workforce after they graduate (Cox). By incorporating technology in the classroom, teachers are setting our students up for a successful life outside of school. The increase of technology has even changed how teachers teach along with how