Bartleby

The narrator of the story becomes shocked when he discovers that Bartleby, who only feeds on ginger nuts, has never left the office. This is actually the first time that the narrator experiences the spiritual power that Bartleby possesses. The narrator is so much business oriented that he only looks at the world in terms of profits. However, when he encounters this aspect of the spirit of Bartleby, his attitude towards life changes. He begins appreciating the fact that Bartleby deserves better treatment, not in the capitalist way. The narrator even sees what is a right, just as an asset, but this perception is later changed by Bartleby’s spirit: “What earthly right have you to stay here? Do you pay any rent? Do you pay my taxes? Or is this property yours?” (Melville, 41).

Herman Melville’s short story “Bartleby, the Scrivener” reveals different themes such as isolation and human morality test. In the story, the narrator runs a law firm and has a new Scrivener [Bartleby] who the narrator describes as“ the strangest I ever saw or heard of” (661). For the first few days, Bartleby is seen to be working fine, however, one day Bartleby just responds with “I would prefer not to” when anyone assigns a task to Bartleby (674). The real problems start to arise when Bartleby sleeps and eats at the office while denying to work or leave. The narrator illustrates the two main themes of human morals and isolation throughout the story with the use of biblical references to Bartleby as a leper and shows symbolism of the

In “Bartleby, the Scrivener” the author, Herman Melville, uses indirect references to hint to many historical, literary, and biblical events. “Bartleby, the Scrivener” contains many allusions about important events that help connect this fictional story to actual events in Melville’s time period, before, and beyond. Melville uses allusions frequently throughout “Bartleby, the Scrivener” to help build connections with the real world and the fictitious world of this short story.

Herman Melville is an acclaimed author of the American Renaissance period and his most commendable works include “Bartleby, the Scrivener”. The story of “Bartleby” is not only a revelation of the business world of the mid-19th century but at the same time, it is also the manifestation of the emerging capitalistic lifestyle of perhaps New York’s most prominent street, Wall Street. Bartleby is a rather peculiar yet captivating figure. Bartleby’s life and death contribute to a sort of enigma for the reader and his employer. “Bartleby, the Scrivener” is a story that criticizes the monotonous day-to-day cycle that the modern working man is forcibly put in by society. With that being said, the death of Bartleby not only serves as a reflection

Bartleby, the Scrivener: A Story of Wall Street by Herman Melville was an interesting story of a scrivener, while the movie was about a public records filer. Both the story and movie had parts that overlapped like Bartleby’s “I prefer not to” attitude and the way the offices were set up. Melville introduces a scrivener that helps makes copies, proofread, and deal with scribing; at first, there was a need for a person to fill the role of a copyist and all duties associated. When first hiring Bartleby he was a diligent and with great skill, but suddenly began to show mental instabilities. This infuriated the well-known lawyer as Bartleby was becoming insubordinate. These same actions reflected in the movie as he refused to file anymore. Both the story and movie had many similarities and small differences. The story was much more detailed and better than compared to the movie.

Bartleby, the Scrivener, is a story written by Herman Mellvile. It is about a successful lawyer who hires a homeless, depressed man named Bartleby to transcribe documents for him. The narrator of this story is the lawyer. Throughout the story, Bartleby declines at his job, saying he would “prefer not” to perform his duties. Eventually, the lawyer learns about Bartleby’s homelessness by discovering he has been living in the office. After a while, the lawyer feels it would be best for the business to just move to a different office, so he does. To his surprise, Bartleby follows him there. Bartleby ends up getting arrested and eventually dies while in prison. This story has great meaning to it. The main character displays a great character of

As the story continues, his sympathy for Bartleby’s predicament develops. Throughout paragraph 90, the lawyer discovers that Bartleby resides in the office and feels pity towards how Bartleby sustains such “ miserable friendlessness and loneliness.” Readers can acknowledge how the Lawyer struggles with maintaining the changing attitudes he feels towards Bartleby: “melancholy merge into fear” and “pity into repulsion” (137). The Lawyer intended to fire Bartleby for his refusal to work, but did not, for he feared of being portrayed as a “villain” (138). According to Jack Getman, the Lawyer has “become a different, more appealing person, one who is more responsive to the needs and rights of his workers” (Getman 738). It is evident that the Lawyer undergoes many changes in the interest of Bartleby.

The lawyer portrays his self-interest when he moves his office and abandons Bartleby, due to his negative affect on the business. Because Bartleby continues to annoyingly dawdle around the old office, the lawyer attempts to rid the building of Bartleby, for the lawyer is "fearful of being exposed" (1201) and criticized by the public. Clearly, the lawyer speaks to Bartleby in hopes of relieving himself from any

Herman Melville’s, “Bartleby, the Scrivener,” tells the tale of Bartleby, the new scrivener at a lawyer’s office on Wall-Street. In an office of industrious, distressed workers who endlessly perform mundane tasks due to the orders of the lawyer, Bartleby forms a mystifying exception. Bartleby baffles his boss and colleagues by responding to requests with his famous line, “I would prefer not to.” His response demonstrates an unwillingness to work and a willingness to do what he truly desires, which is extremely unusual to both his colleagues and their society and creates a massive social divide between them. Due to the abandonment of those around him resulting from their growing frustration with his inactivity, Bartleby ultimately faces a swift

“Since he will not quit me, I must quit him. Ah Bartleby, Ah Humanity.” (Melville 131) This is the key to Bartleby, for it indicates that he stands as a symbol for humanity. This in turn functions as a commentary on society and the working world, for Bartleby is a seemingly homeless, mentally scrivener who gives up on the prospect of living life, finally withdrawing himself from society. However, by doing so Bartleby is attempting to exercise his freewill, for he would “prefer not to” work. His relationship to the narrator (the Lawyer) and the normal progression of life. However, this

Bartleby, unlike the lawyer, regards money as a mere concept, thinking it of little importance and disregarding its value in society. Bartleby does not acknowledge the potential value of money, choosing not to assign a dollar value to anything materialistic . While the rest of Wall Street hustles around its financial core, Bartleby’s “poverty is great,” and his very existence builds around his poverty. The lawyer realizes that Bartleby “must have ate, dressed, and slept in my office” without the lawyer’s consent or knowledge. Bartleby’s behavior supports the belief that property does not have a price, nor does it belong to anyone. Property, like all other materialistic objects in Bartleby holds financial value, thus it belongs to anyone. Bartleby's disregard for money, further accounts for his refusal to receive money. When the lawyer gives him his salary , Bartleby ¨made no motion”and chooses not to touch it. His actions support the concept, having little worth and amounting to nothing in a worldly sense. He firmly opposes money as a

Lastly, the last employee The Lawyer describes is Bartleby. According to the Lawyer, Bartle is, “one of those beings of whom nothing is ascertainable, except from the original sources, and in his case those are very small” (Melville 1). To him, Bartleby is the most interesting scriveners of all time. Bartleby joins the office after getting hired when he saw an ad placed by the Lawyer, which at that time needed extra help in his office. In the

The narrator went to great lengths to avoid a confrontation. When Bartleby refused to leave the office after being fired, the narrator chose to move his office to a different location instead of removing the eccentric man by force. The narrator informs the reader of this idea when he says, “ No more then. Since he will not quit me, I must quit him. I will change my offices.” (2422) By doing so, the narrator displays just how far man is sometimes willing to go to avoid conflict. The final theme is man’s desire to have a free conscience. Melville reveals this theme through the actions of the narrator as well as the new tenants of the office. The narrator attempts to appease his conscience by giving Bartleby money above his wages when he fired him. The new tenants of the office try to put the responsibility of dealing with Bartleby back on the narrator, but they are denied and eventually have the man removed from the premises by law officers. Herman Melville uses the actions and reactions of the characters in “Bartleby the Scrivener” to disclose three important themes, alienation, man’s desire to avoid conflict, and man’s desire to keep a free conscience. In doing so, he gives us an inside look into the workings of the human mind. The reader is left with the impression that all people, including lawyers, have compassion for other humans, and at some point, that

The narrator reasons that releasing Bartleby from his job would be unnecessarily cruel which indicates his need to do the right thing. The narrator’s pity is inexplicably a reason for Bartleby’s continued employment: “What miserable friendlessness and loneliness are here revealed! His poverty is great; but his solitude how horrible!” (673). In this case, the narrator faces the challenge of giving the poor scribe a place to stay and survive or releasing Bartleby onto the streets where another employer may not be so kind. He also feels, however, that Bartleby’s quirks are not at all easy to accommodate: “In plain fact, he had now become a millstone to me, not only useless as a necklace, but afflictive to bear” (676). The narrator, in this section, faces the need to do the socially acceptable thing. After all, a man who does not work should not be paid or allowed to remain employed. As literary critic Richard J. Zlogar explained in a commentary that analogized Melville’s short story with certain parts of The Bible, “The narrator’s challenge, then, if he is to heal Bartleby’s illness in its social aspect, is the same challenge that confronted Jesus Christ in his interaction with the leper, as discussed by Crossan: he must force his peers ‘either to reject him from their community or to accept the leper within it as well’” (Zlogar 521). Zlogar’s commentary provides insight on what the narrator’s options are; he must either

The Narrator in Bartleby the Scrivener makes a point to describe the setting and its interactions with the characters to Elucidate not only the question of Free Will but to create Melville’s indictment of labor within the structure of Capitalism. The Concept of Free Will and necessity play an important role in constructing the universe and laws therein. They not only aid in structuring the plot and how a thing occurs in a fictional universe. They give insight to the author’s view of the world and are recurring themes in Herman Melville’s work. The concept of Free Will and necessity allow for an immediate change in the moral paradigm and give Melville a platform and structure with which to create his indictment of labor and Capitalism. In “Bartleby the Schrivener,” he mentions two Necessitarian philosophers from a Christian background. The two works by these philosophers and Necessitarianism in general give a unique perspective as to what Melville is trying to convey in this story. They construct a world not of possibilities, but of rigidity and lacking in the traditional conception of freedom.