preview

Basic Life Support Case Summary

Decent Essays
Open Document

Ms. Sieling stated she opened this third case and that the previous cases had been closed unsuccessfully. During this reopening meeting, the client spoke about her volunteering, her desire to be independent, and motivated for employment. The IPE was written by Pat Gilliard and based on the client’s individual needs all agreed to thirty days in JRT, job coach services, and the vocational goal of transporter. She entered JRT to build work skills, work with the job coach, and participate in JPI classes. The Basic Life Support class with Trident Technical College was rescheduled due to a miscommunication on the date/time. The client was allowed to stay in the training center until the class could be taken. While she completed the course, the client was not able to pass the test after taking the class; therefore, she did not receive the BLS certification needed for transporter positions. Ms. Sieling reached out to the Continuing Education Department at Trident Technical College and they agreed to allow the client the opportunity to sit in the class again and retest. The client and mother did not move forward with doing this as the mother explained Lawrencia …show more content…

However, the meeting ended abruptly when Ms. Alvenia Smalls asked to record the meeting. The SCVRD Ombudsman staffed this request with Legal Counsel, and the request was denied. In the absence of the Smalls, VR moved forward with the meeting and determined it would be best for the client to participate in rapid placement (place and train) as JPI & JRT services had been completed per the IPE. Ms. Sieling reached out to Oakbrook Rehabilitation Center who agreed to give the client an opportunity to job shadow/tour the facility to observe someone in the dietary aide position. When this was presented to the client and mother, they did not respond. Multiple job leads were shared with the client via phone messages, but no calls were

Get Access